Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Lexus Unfazed by LS Decline as S Class, Model S Grow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-14, 08:07 AM
  #196  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,768
Received 2,127 Likes on 1,379 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by J.P.
Was in a new S63 this weekend, have to say, it did feel like it was on another level but for the price, it should be.
per their website, S63: 577HP, 0-60: 3.9seconds and an amazingly sophisticated suspension...

http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/vehicl...-S/model-S63V4

of course specs like that are going to cost a load. $141,450 start

but then, per lexus website, the flagship (LS600hL) has 438HP, 0-60: 5.5seconds, and starts at $120,060.

the LS600hL is an awesome vehicle too, but the S63 is 15% more which is peanuts when you're spending that kind of coin. of course options can make the S63 price go through the roof, but that level of customization is what people want.

a more reasonable comparison to the LS600hL though would be to an S550 4Matic (449HP, 0-60: 4.8seconds) which is $97,400 - a 'bargain'.

Last edited by bitkahuna; 07-14-14 at 08:14 AM.
bitkahuna is online now  
Old 07-14-14, 08:35 AM
  #197  
yowps3
Lexus Test Driver
 
yowps3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lexus is a company that currently has an "identity crisis".
The gap between the Germans (excluding BMW) is widening, Lexus clearly peaked since it started till about 2007 (2IS, LS460 and 2007 ES350) were all killer products that redefined the game, LS460 was a technological prowess, IS350 established the 300HP V6 & the ES350 continued its role as a poster child of refinement.

Lexus clearly had it all under its belt. But fast forward 7-8yrs and this brand seems rather lost. The products lack consistency, the design language is all over the place, the overall package is seriously lacking when compared to their core rivals (Germans) Lexus is in trouble and now even their secondary rivals (Infiniti, Buick, Acura, Cadillac & Lincoln) are eating right into Lexus's lunch.

The moral of the story is that in a time where the Germans are improving their value proposition by offering sharper products at sharper prices, Lexus is offering lesser products than what they were capable of! Think of the downgrade in materials, downgrade in insulation used, downgrade in other areas where the rivals have truly eclipsed Lexus, at their own game!

Last edited by yowps3; 07-14-14 at 09:41 AM.
yowps3 is offline  
Old 07-14-14, 09:13 AM
  #198  
Infra
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Infra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by yowps3
Lexus is a company that currently has an "identity crisis".
The gap between the Germans (excluding BMW) is widening, Lexus clearly peaked since it started till about 2007 (2IS, LS460 and 2007 ES350) were all killer products that redefined the game, LS460 was a technological prowess, IS350 established the 300HP V6 & the ES350 continued its role as a poster child of refinement.

Lexus clearly had it all under its belt. But fast forward 7-8yrs and this brand seems rather lost. The products lack consistency, the design language is all over the place, the overall package is seriously lacking when compared to their core rivals (Germans) Lexus is in trouble and now even their secondary rivals (Infiniti, Buick, Acura, Cadillac & Lincoln) are eating right into Lexus's lunch.

The moral of the story is that in a time where the Germans are improving their value proposition by offering sharper products at sharper prices, Lexus is offering lesser products than what they were capable of! Thing of the downgrade in materials, downgrade in insulation used, downgrade in other areas where the rivals have truly eclipsed Lexus at their own game!
What?

Mercedes has done a nice job on the S-class, but has completely thrown in the towel on the C-class, in essence saying "We can't make a competitive sport sedan, so we'll just make a small S-class". The new C is a nice car, but it's distinctly a Mercedes, and will turn off a lot of buyers looking for the sport it does not offer. Although, nothing much new there. MB knows what they are - a luxury car maker - and everything they do aligns with that. It's a good target, as people with more money tend to buy softly-sprung products with plush materials more than they care about dynamics, and so they do not need to do anything other than make very comfortable vehicles at very high prices.

Audi is pretty lost. It can't decide what to do with the next R8, either a radical redesign or further tweaks to the existing. All their cars are due for new generations in order to keep up with MB & BMW. Expect the new B9 A4/A5 next year or so, and the A8 to follow.

BMW is off the road in the dirt chasing sales. They've left behind what made them famous in an effort to offer everything to anyone willing to look at their portfolio. Sure, the M3/M4 seem to be good, but all other M products have turned into AMG-like cars (meaning not much handling, lots of power), and their core of 3 & 5 series SPORT sedans are being outdone by Lexus! The 5 series has been rated as the worst in its class, actually.

I'm not sure what you're seeing.
Infra is offline  
Old 07-14-14, 09:15 AM
  #199  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by J.P.
Was in a new S63 this weekend, have to say, it did feel like it was on another level but for the price, it should be.
It is and should be.

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
per their website, S63: 577HP, 0-60: 3.9seconds and an amazingly sophisticated suspension...

http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/vehicl...-S/model-S63V4

of course specs like that are going to cost a load. $141,450 start

but then, per lexus website, the flagship (LS600hL) has 438HP, 0-60: 5.5seconds, and starts at $120,060.

the LS600hL is an awesome vehicle too, but the S63 is 15% more which is peanuts when you're spending that kind of coin. of course options can make the S63 price go through the roof, but that level of customization is what people want.

a more reasonable comparison to the LS600hL though would be to an S550 4Matic (449HP, 0-60: 4.8seconds) which is $97,400 - a 'bargain'.
Why would anyone compare the two? They are not competitors at all. We were teased with a competitor the TMG 650 which we found out was commissioned by Akio Toyoda himself. I guess you were not aware of these Lexus tidbits. It is a twin turbo V-8 good for around 650hp, ceramic brakes and from it being tested is an absolutely blast to drive. Shame it won't make production. It was influenced by F1 experts in the company.



When I was a super-moderator I remember when we posted the picture up here as a spy photo and we were asked by I believe TMG to take it down right away as it was a secret project.



Originally Posted by yowps3
Lexus is a company that currently has an "identity crisis".
The gap between the Germans (excluding BMW) is widening, Lexus clearly peaked since it started till about 2007 (2IS, LS460 and 2007 ES350) were all killer products that redefined the game, LS460 was a technological prowess, IS350 established the 300HP V6 & the ES350 continued its role as a poster child of refinement.

Lexus clearly had it all under its belt. But fast forward 7-8yrs and this brand seems rather lost. The products lack consistency, the design language is all over the place, the overall package is seriously lacking when compared to their core rivals (Germans) Lexus is in trouble and now even their secondary rivals (Infiniti, Buick, Acura, Cadillac & Lincoln) are eating right into Lexus's lunch.

The moral of the story is that in a time where the Germans are improving their value proposition by offering sharper products at sharper prices, Lexus is offering lesser products than what they were capable of! Thing of the downgrade in materials, downgrade in insulation used, downgrade in other areas where the rivals have truly eclipsed Lexus at their own game!
lol
 
Old 07-14-14, 09:18 AM
  #200  
doge
Formerly Bad Co
 
doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Infra
What?

Mercedes has done a nice job on the S-class, but has completely thrown in the towel on the C-class, in essence saying "We can't make a competitive sport sedan, so we'll just make a small S-class". The new C is a nice car, but it's distinctly a Mercedes, and will turn off a lot of buyers looking for the sport it does not offer. Although, nothing much new there. MB knows what they are - a luxury car maker - and everything they do aligns with that. It's a good target, as people with more money tend to buy softly-sprung products with plush materials more than they care about dynamics, and so they do not need to do anything other than make very comfortable vehicles at very high prices.

Audi is pretty lost. It can't decide what to do with the next R8, either a radical redesign or further tweaks to the existing. All their cars are due for new generations in order to keep up with MB & BMW. Expect the new B9 A4/A5 next year or so, and the A8 to follow.

BMW is off the road in the dirt chasing sales. They've left behind what made them famous in an effort to offer everything to anyone willing to look at their portfolio. Sure, the M3/M4 seem to be good, but all other M products have turned into AMG-like cars (meaning not much handling, lots of power), and their core of 3 & 5 series SPORT sedans are being outdone by Lexus! The 5 series has been rated as the worst in its class, actually.

I'm not sure what you're seeing.
+1 the new CTS-V Sport is a better car than the 550. Have you ever thought you would here some one say a cadi weighs less than a bmw and its more of a drivers car?
doge is offline  
Old 07-14-14, 09:34 AM
  #201  
Carmaker1
Instructor
 
Carmaker1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: MI
Posts: 1,089
Received 130 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexFather
Hey cmk1 great perspective and I honestly am not really disagreeing with you outside of the point that the 1989 LS won't happen again. Ever. The only people possibly would be the Chinese in 20 years or so. Hyundai/Kia could not come close to replicating it even with the price advantage.

I just think it is a false expectation to have and again, we have people in here complaining the LS is "cheap" so if Lexus undercuts the competitors again they will again post that monkey crap up.

1989 was 1989, the LS 400 was historic, chosen by many experts in the field as one of the top 100 influential cars of all time. It clearly completely altered the shape of the luxury field. I don't expect any new LS to do that because most every brand is fully awake.

Never have I stated the LS is superior in my reviews and posts. Never have I stated it has no negatives. Quite frankly my LS has the lowest V-8 power and also the lowest rated MPG. I would like massaging seats. I would like red leather. I would like the rear entertainment package on the F-sport.

For my needs, the LS 460 F-sport is perfect and its surpassed all expectations I had. I envy previous LS owners who had the opportunity to own it over the years!! What a car! If there was no F-sport I would not be driving a LS. Lexus is on to something here
Okay, that clarifies things for me better. Well to me, it's not really about it being inferior or superior. I was mostly speaking from my frustration due to impatient curiosity of course, but understand why it cannot be 1989 again on that front. I usually try to take an objective viewpoint on things, but in this case I only want the best possible for them and we are both certain they will deliver.

At least the 460 did have a bump in power, which is reasonable for a place-holding facelift. I assume that they believe US F-Sport drivers won't be "driven" and omitted the rear entertainment. I have to wonder if it's Lexus Corporate in Nagoya responsible for such decisions or Lexus USA. It is lovely though, especially in white. I just don't understand why 4 full years, instead 3 to 3 1/2, so I expect the best. I already know about the next XJ personally, the G11 might be rinse/repeat, W222 is already out, and not liking Audi's direction.

Originally Posted by yowps3
In the grand scheme of things the LS is doing great, I mean it really is a 8yrs old car yet it is outselling most newer rivals. That is a testimonial to how good & timeless it is.

The XF40 LS makes the W-221 S-class seem like a chrysler product in comparison, despite the fact they the W221 is actually newer than the XF40 LS



And I have no doubt in my mind that the next LS will be another extraordinary LS
Based on what? The terrible photos of a used 2007 model (or pre-facelift) you provided? I'd choose the 2007-09 LS460L anytime over the 2007-09 S550, as I never really liked that S version. It was clear it was hampered by the Maybach's presence, until Daimler later stopped caring about not usurping Maybach in the late 00s.

BTW, the W221 was concept developed and designed even way before the LS430 facelift came out. How is that newer? As already said by rominl, it officially debuted in June 2005 and LS460 in Jan. 2006. Do not really like it when one makes such a derogatory, nonfactual comparison.

This is from 2002 (see pre-facelift LS430). The interior was also final back then, so that's a 2001-02 design effort you are comparing to Lexus efforts in 2004 (below).





Originally Posted by Mr. Burns
The new S-class was not a monumental leap, it's still based on the old one after all.
How did you figure that? It is somewhat true. The W222 project began 8 years ago and reached a critical point in 2009. The MRA modular platform wasn't ready for it, so I can see why that happened. I can't remember where I read it, but the W221 was also related somewhat to the W220 chassis.

The last 100% ground up S-Class was the costly W140. They have been trying to consistently improve reliability, after the W220 nightmare. The next S-Class will be the revolution and may be named outside of the W22_ codes. The new LS might use a modular platform though and so will some future Lexus models.

Originally Posted by rogers2
IMO I feel it's a huge monumental leap. I don't know one car that offers the amount options and features.
It's hard to trump the KING when you’re already the KING.
When you begin to look at the brochure you realize this car is the epitome of luxury.

http://www.mbusa.com/vcm/MB/DigitalA...14-S-Class.pdf

I also feel Mr. Smith is full of B.S. Every car company should worry about the other regardless. While I feel the next LS will be nice. In order for it to match the S class. Lexus is going to have to up the price.
I agree, as I have stressed this many times. The XF40 is far from a bad car, but this thread is about what Lexus needs to bring to the table and in my opinion, reduce their limitations somewhat. I guess it would be unrealistic to see it topple the W222 10 times over, but it should at least be somewhere that media detractors would come across as genuinely dimwitted fools in petty criticism of it. Then being seen for the German sycophants many of them are.

Last edited by Carmaker1; 07-14-14 at 09:45 AM.
Carmaker1 is offline  
Old 07-14-14, 09:47 AM
  #202  
PatsSoxfan
Lead Lap
 
PatsSoxfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Some here are using the excuse that the S Class costs a lot more than the LS and thus it should be a better car. Well, when I first made it public here back in the winter that I had switched from being a loyal LS customer to the all new 2014 S550 and a couple months later took delivery on April 5, I said that I paid about $104K after a discount of about $4500. To have purchased the new LS 460L with all the options except for the executive seating, the MSRP would have come out to over $100K. Assuming I would have gotten an even larger discount from my Lexus dealer, perhaps I would have paid about $95K for the new LS. The kicker is that quite a few of the incredible options that I have with the S550 are not available on the LS. So, assuming (fairly bold assumption I might add) that I would have gotten this larger discount from Lexus, I paid about $9K more for a car that by everyone's review is on another level above any other luxury car at this time.
PatsSoxfan is offline  
Old 07-14-14, 12:11 PM
  #203  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,670
Received 184 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PatsSoxfan
Some here are using the excuse that the S Class costs a lot more than the LS and thus it should be a better car. Well, when I first made it public here back in the winter that I had switched from being a loyal LS customer to the all new 2014 S550 and a couple months later took delivery on April 5, I said that I paid about $104K after a discount of about $4500. To have purchased the new LS 460L with all the options except for the executive seating, the MSRP would have come out to over $100K. Assuming I would have gotten an even larger discount from my Lexus dealer, perhaps I would have paid about $95K for the new LS. The kicker is that quite a few of the incredible options that I have with the S550 are not available on the LS. So, assuming (fairly bold assumption I might add) that I would have gotten this larger discount from Lexus, I paid about $9K more for a car that by everyone's review is on another level above any other luxury car at this time.
that's why in general i respect information and posts a lot more from actual owners of both sides
rominl is offline  
Old 07-14-14, 12:13 PM
  #204  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,768
Received 2,127 Likes on 1,379 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexFather
Why would anyone compare the two? They are not competitors at all.
ok, you're right, lexus has NOTHING to compete with the S63/S65.

We were teased with a competitor the TMG 650 which we found out was commissioned by Akio Toyoda himself. I guess you were not aware of these Lexus tidbits.
of course i remember that interesting one off. i don't care if it was commissioned by God though, because it's not available.

lexus has a lot of good stuff coming out but does too much 'teasing'. the nx won't be out until q4, the rc-f, when will that be out? and lf-lc? it's getting a bit like that other brand you hate.
bitkahuna is online now  
Old 07-14-14, 12:17 PM
  #205  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,768
Received 2,127 Likes on 1,379 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PatsSoxfan
Some here are using the excuse that the S Class costs a lot more than the LS and thus it should be a better car. Well, when I first made it public here back in the winter that I had switched from being a loyal LS customer to the all new 2014 S550 and a couple months later took delivery on April 5, I said that I paid about $104K after a discount of about $4500. To have purchased the new LS 460L with all the options except for the executive seating, the MSRP would have come out to over $100K. Assuming I would have gotten an even larger discount from my Lexus dealer, perhaps I would have paid about $95K for the new LS. The kicker is that quite a few of the incredible options that I have with the S550 are not available on the LS. So, assuming (fairly bold assumption I might add) that I would have gotten this larger discount from Lexus, I paid about $9K more for a car that by everyone's review is on another level above any other luxury car at this time.
excellent post and thank you for sharing. the LS is an excellent car, but like the RX will need a BIG upgrade for the next version. the market is there, lexus just has to really bring it.
bitkahuna is online now  
Old 07-14-14, 01:36 PM
  #206  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by PatsSoxfan
Some here are using the excuse that the S Class costs a lot more than the LS and thus it should be a better car. Well, when I first made it public here back in the winter that I had switched from being a loyal LS customer to the all new 2014 S550 and a couple months later took delivery on April 5, I said that I paid about $104K after a discount of about $4500. To have purchased the new LS 460L with all the options except for the executive seating, the MSRP would have come out to over $100K. Assuming I would have gotten an even larger discount from my Lexus dealer, perhaps I would have paid about $95K for the new LS. The kicker is that quite a few of the incredible options that I have with the S550 are not available on the LS. So, assuming (fairly bold assumption I might add) that I would have gotten this larger discount from Lexus, I paid about $9K more for a car that by everyone's review is on another level above any other luxury car at this time.
Great post. Its very clear the new W222 is quite the vehicle, the interior is as good as it gets with the optional packages.

The funny thing though is in America, we only start with the S550 so people might think that is all that is offered. Here is the U.K site, the S-class can be had in
I-4
V-6
V-8
S63
S65
diesel
hybrid

engine choices. The S550 here is called S500 there.

http://www2.mercedes-benz.co.uk/cont...del-navi:_w222


Originally Posted by rominl
that's why in general i respect information and posts a lot more from actual owners of both sides
Thank you for the compliment!

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
ok, you're right, lexus has NOTHING to compete with the S63/S65.

of course i remember that interesting one off. i don't care if it was commissioned by God though, because it's not available.

lexus has a lot of good stuff coming out but does too much 'teasing'. the nx won't be out until q4, the rc-f, when will that be out? and lf-lc? it's getting a bit like that other brand you hate.
Didn't realize this was another thread to try to throw Lexus under the bus on a Lexus forum.
 
Old 07-14-14, 02:14 PM
  #207  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,670
Received 184 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexFather


Thank you for the compliment!
:
you don't have to thank me, my message was only to PatsSoxfan who owned his own LS and now his own S class. just making sure

Last edited by rominl; 07-14-14 at 02:18 PM.
rominl is offline  
Old 07-14-14, 02:29 PM
  #208  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexFather
The S550 here is called S500 there
Some article I read, Americans feel better about larger numbers
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 07-14-14, 02:57 PM
  #209  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by rominl
you don't have to thank me, my message was only to PatsSoxfan who owned his own LS and now his own S class. just making sure
Thank you for the rude response!
 
Old 07-14-14, 04:54 PM
  #210  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,842
Received 110 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
lexus has a lot of good stuff coming out but does too much 'teasing'. the nx won't be out until q4, the rc-f, when will that be out? and lf-lc? it's getting a bit like that other brand you hate.
NX will start deliveries in 3 months - 90 days, and RC-F is also going to start delivering about that time in the US, maybe 20-30 days later max. I dont understand what are you trying to say?

Did you think that these cars are coming out in next few years?
spwolf is online now  


Quick Reply: Lexus Unfazed by LS Decline as S Class, Model S Grow



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:23 AM.