Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

2014 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-14, 03:01 PM
  #1  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default 2014 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study

Initial Quality Problems Increase as Automakers Struggle to Launch Vehicles with Technology That Consumers Find Easy to Use

Porsche Ranks Highest among Nameplates for a Second Consecutive Year; General Motors Company Receives Six Model-Level Awards; Hyundai Motor Company Receives Five

WESTLAKE VILLAGE, Calif.: 18 June 2014 - The number of problems experienced by new-vehicle owners has increased from the previous year, as automakers continued to be challenged when introducing sophisticated technologies in new vehicles, according to the J.D. Power 2014 U.S. Initial Quality StudySM (IQS) released today.

The study, now in its 28th year, examines problems experienced by vehicle owners during the first 90 days of ownership. Initial quality is determined by the number of problems experienced per 100 vehicles (PP100), with a lower score reflecting higher quality.

The study finds that overall initial quality averages 116 PP100, a 3 percent increase in problems from 113 PP100 in 2013. This year's increase in problems follows a similar increase found in the J.D. Power U.S. 2014 Vehicle Dependability StudySM (VDS) released in February, which measures problems experienced after three years of ownership.

Some Consumers Struggle with New Technology

The study identifies two primary causes of the increased problem levels in 2014. First, newly launched vehicles (those that are completely new to the market or have undergone major redesigns) continue to be more problematic than carryover vehicles (those that did not undergo any significant changes). On average, newly launched vehicles experience 128 PP100, compared with 113 PP100 for carryover vehicles. The increase in problems among all-new vehicles is found mainly in the areas of voice recognition, Bluetooth pairing and audio systems.

"Automakers are trying to give consumers the new features and technology they want without introducing additional quality problems into their vehicles," said David Sargent, vice president of global automotive at J.D. Power. "However, almost all automakers are struggling to do this flawlessly with some consumers indicating that the technology is hard to understand, difficult to use, or simply does not always work as designed."

Harsh Weather Conditions also Affect Quality

Some regions experienced increases in problem types associated with harsh weather. Consumers in the South and West regions of the country report the same level of problems as in 2013 (114 PP100). In contrast, consumers in the Northeast and Midwest regions report 117 PP100 in 2014, compared with 112 PP100 in 2013. Most of this increase is found in the heating/ventilation/air conditioning, exterior and engine/transmission categories, three areas in which harsh weather conditions have an adverse effect on vehicles.

"Automakers test vehicles in extreme conditions to ensure they function properly," said Sargent. "However, it is impossible to completely negate the effects of severe weather. Heating and ventilation systems have more work to do, engines and transmissions aren't as smooth when cold, and exterior moldings and paint all take some punishment. Consumers generally understand this but still report problems when their vehicle does not wholly live up to their expectations."

Initial Quality Affects Brand Loyalty

The study also finds that the fewer problems owners experience with their vehicle, the greater their loyalty to the brand. Combined data from previous years' IQS results and the Power Information Network® (PIN) from J.D. Power show that 57 percent of owners who reported no problems stayed with the same brand when they purchased their next new vehicle. Brand loyalty slips to 53 percent among owners who reported just a single problem and to only 48 percent among owners who reported two or more problems.

"Even problems experienced in the first 90 days correlate strongly with ultimate repurchase behavior," said Sargent. "These early problems can set the tone for the entire ownership period and still have an effect years later when consumers replace their vehicle."

Highest-Ranked Nameplates and Models

For a second consecutive year, Porsche ranks highest in initial quality among all nameplates, with a score of 74 PP100. Following Porsche in the rankings are Jaguar (87 PP100), Lexus (92 PP100) and Hyundai (94 PP100).

General Motors Company receives six segment awards-more than any other automaker for a second consecutive year-for the Buick Encore (tie); Chevrolet Malibu; Chevrolet Silverado HD; Chevrolet Suburban (tie); GMC Terrain; and GMC Yukon (tie). Hyundai Motor Company receives five awards for the Hyundai Accent; Hyundai Elantra; Hyundai Genesis; Kia Cadenza; and Kia Sportage (tie). Other corporations with multiple award recipients are Ford Motor Company (Ford Edge, Ford F-150 LD and Lincoln MKX); Nissan Motor Company (Infiniti QX50, Infiniti QX80 and Nissan JUKE [tie]); Volkswagen AG (Porsche 911, Porsche Boxster and Porsche Panamera); Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (Chrysler Town & Country and Dodge Challenger); and Mazda (Mazda MAZDA5 and Mazda MX-5 Miata). Other models receiving awards are the Honda Ridgeline and Lexus ES.

Plant Assembly Line Quality Awards

Toyota Motor Corporation's Cambridge South, Ontario, Canada (TMMC) plant, which produces the Lexus RX, receives the Platinum Plant Quality Award for producing models that yield the fewest defects or malfunctions. Plant quality awards are based solely on defects and malfunctions and exclude design-related problems.

Two sister plants receive the Gold Plant Quality Award in the Asia Pacific region. Toyota Motor Corporation's Kyushu 1, Japan (TMK) plant produces the Lexus CT and RX. Across the road, the same company's Kyushu 2 plant produces the Lexus ES, IS and RX.

In the Europe and Africa region, Porsche AG receives the Gold Plant Quality Award for its Leipzig, Germany (P), plant, which produces the Porsche Cayenne and Panamera.

The 2014 U.S. Initial Quality Study is based on responses from more than 86,000 purchasers and lessees of new 2014 model-year vehicles surveyed after 90 days of ownership. The study is based on a 233-question battery designed to provide manufacturers with information to facilitate the identification of problems and drive product improvement. The study was fielded between February and May 2014.
http://www.jdpower.com/press-release...ity-study-iqs#







Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 06-18-14, 03:09 PM
  #2  
ydooby
Lexus Champion
 
ydooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pretty alarming that only one Lexus (the ES) wins its category. Lexus used to lead every category in which it has a model. And Hyundai is right up there too, beating Toyota by a noticeable margin in fact. Hopefully Lexus's recent push towards sportiness will not come at the cost of quality.

http://www.jdpower.com/press-release...lity-study-iqs
ydooby is offline  
Old 06-18-14, 03:29 PM
  #3  
Gojirra99
Super Moderator
 
Gojirra99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 30,050
Received 186 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

Lexus ES is "compact " ??
Gojirra99 is offline  
Old 06-18-14, 03:30 PM
  #4  
Tantrix
Lead Lap
 
Tantrix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: ny
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

how did porsche get the least amount of problems ?
Tantrix is offline  
Old 06-18-14, 03:41 PM
  #5  
pheonix72
Lead Lap
iTrader: (6)
 
pheonix72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: ca
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tantrix
how did porsche get the least amount of problems ?
Initial quality rating study is the most misleading/stupid survey I ever known (IMHO). It is only "examines problems experienced by vehicle owners during the first 90 days of ownership". The only true measurement is how well the car hold up after the warranty expired.
Maybe the reason Porsche is number ONE because Porsches didn't get driven a lot (to find out all the problems they have).
pheonix72 is offline  
Old 06-18-14, 03:52 PM
  #6  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pheonix72
Initial quality rating study is the most misleading/stupid survey I ever known (IMHO). It is only "examines problems experienced by vehicle owners during the first 90 days of ownership". The only true measurement is how well the car hold up after the warranty expired.
Maybe the reason Porsche is number ONE because Porsches didn't get driven a lot (to find out all the problems they have).
Vehicle Dependability Study is more important IMO. Lexus sets the standard

Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 06-18-14, 03:52 PM
  #7  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,690
Received 2,097 Likes on 1,360 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tantrix
how did porsche get the least amount of problems ?
their vehicles ain't cheap so perhaps maybe they're able to avoid the kind of corner cutting that other makers do, and maybe they're spending a ton of money on quality control.

and so much for all those saying jaguars and hyundais are crap.

honda should be ashamed of acura's rankings and fiat should just give up in the u.s.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 06-18-14, 03:57 PM
  #8  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,690
Received 2,097 Likes on 1,360 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pheonix72
The only true measurement is how well the car hold up after the warranty expired.
says who? if someone has a TON of problems fixed DURING the warranty period and then the vehicle does ok after that, does that make it a great vehicle? i think not.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 06-18-14, 04:08 PM
  #9  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
their vehicles ain't cheap so perhaps maybe they're able to avoid the kind of corner cutting that other makers do, and maybe they're spending a ton of money on quality control.

and so much for all those saying jaguars and hyundais are crap.
There's certainly truth in that. Add in the lower volume of Porsche vs say Hyundai and they are able to rectify/address issues more quickly as they arise.

As for Jaguar and Hyundai, there doesn't seem to be much of an issue until you own them for some time in which the infamous reliability comes into play. The Vehicle Dependability Study above shows us that after a few years the 'Initial Quality' has indeed worn off
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 06-18-14, 04:12 PM
  #10  
pheonix72
Lead Lap
iTrader: (6)
 
pheonix72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: ca
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
says who? if someone has a TON of problems fixed DURING the warranty period and then the vehicle does ok after that, does that make it a great vehicle? i think not.
Say ME (and those whom keep their cars passed warranty period). I judge a great vehicle by how many problems it has; a great car most likely wont have too many problems. That is why we always check service records/histories before buying any car. A bad car with too many problems during warranty will continue have problems afterward!
pheonix72 is offline  
Old 06-18-14, 04:20 PM
  #11  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pheonix72
Say ME (and those whom keep their cars passed warranty period). I judge a great vehicle by how many problems it has; a great car most likely wont have too many problems. That is why we always check service records/histories before buying any car. A bad car with too many problems during warranty will continue have problems afterward!
My parents had a 1994 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo when I was growing up

(not ours, looked like this)


had multiple transmission issues (two replacements) and we couldn't have loved this car more. A fun great vehicle despite mechanical issues
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 06-18-14, 04:43 PM
  #12  
pheonix72
Lead Lap
iTrader: (6)
 
pheonix72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: ca
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Everyone loves their Jeep Cherokee;-) anyhow, I think we are talking about "great" in terms of quality, dependability and reliability.
pheonix72 is offline  
Old 06-18-14, 06:45 PM
  #13  
corradoMR2
The pursuit of F
 
corradoMR2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 8,296
Received 288 Likes on 209 Posts
Default

The increase in problems among all-new vehicles is found mainly in the areas of voice recognition, Bluetooth pairing and audio systems.
I bet the slip with Lexus to 3rd is due to this and not anything mechanical, structural, electrical, or even fit/finish. For instance the 3IS has had some issues with the NAV/Audio system freezing or rebooting...
corradoMR2 is offline  
Old 06-18-14, 07:00 PM
  #14  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,519
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411

For those who claim that the new GM isn't really new, note the two highest-scoring American nameplates....Cadillac and Buick. Even Chevy is now above the industry average.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-18-14, 07:08 PM
  #15  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,476
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
For those who claim that the new GM isn't really new, note the two highest-scoring American nameplates....Cadillac and Buick. Even Chevy is now above the industry average.
Just wait a few years, I sure the ignitions on the current GM products will deemed faulty
Toys4RJill is offline  


Quick Reply: 2014 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:38 PM.