Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Morgan Stanley: Dramatic consolidation coming to auto industry

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-14, 04:25 PM
  #1  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,284
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default Morgan Stanley: Dramatic consolidation coming to auto industry

Morgan Stanley: Dramatic consolidation coming to auto industry


Washington— An auto industry analyst thinks the world’s nearly 30 major automakers will see dramatic consolidation — and about a half dozen will remain.

Morgan Stanley auto analyst Adam Jonas said in a research note Tuesday that the U.S. auto industry needs a dramatic change in thinking, spurred on by electric vehicle maker Tesla Motors Inc.

“We believe the radically changing landscape of autos requires a commensurate change of thinking in Detroit if the domestic OEMs, as we have traditionally known them, are to remain relevant 15 or 20 years from now,” Jonas said. “The world has too many car companies: We cover nearly 30 auto assemblers globally across eight countries. In our opinion, the balance of economic, competitive and technological forces will ultimately consolidate this figure to five or six players.”

Forecasts a decade ago of auto industry consolidation haven’t come true.

During the financial crisis, governments helped prop up struggling automakers. Consolidation has taken place among suppliers, but not to the extent some had predicted.

Jonas said vision will be necessary for automakers to survive. As recently as 1950, Detroit was home to nearly a dozen major automakers.

“There are several auto firms with the vision to make it to that final select group. Others are more distracted by the issues of the day, working diligently towards the next engineering cycle,” he said.

He said the newest battle line is integration of technology being developed outside the auto industry.

General Motors Co. said last year it had set up a committee to review Tesla’s operations and see if it could learn anything.

“Tesla could either end up being Detroit’s worst enemy or its salvation,” Jonas said. “In our opinion, the disruption from Tesla comes early enough to allow an incumbent sufficient time to adapt its culture, capital allocation and recruiting strategy to the changing forces. With proper execution, Detroit may thank Tesla Motors for being that stiff board in the back of the head right when they needed it.”

He questioned if U.S. automakers are prepared as the industry moves to self-driving cars.

“Do GM and Ford have the right talent and organizational structures in place to achieve industrial leadership in these areas? Probably not enough, we think,” Jonas said, noting it will require careful collaboration with suppliers.

He said an unusually high concentration of new players in the worldwide tech industry are based in Silicon Valley, presenting a unique opportunity for domestic auto companies. He noted that BMW AG has about twice as many tech professionals staffed at its Mountain View technology center than all of Detroit’s automakers.
http://www.detroitnews.com/article/2...-auto-industry
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 03-30-14, 04:38 PM
  #2  
corradoMR2
The pursuit of F
 
corradoMR2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 8,296
Received 289 Likes on 210 Posts
Default

With many cars being fully autonomous 15-20 years from now, (sadly) will driving pleasure matter anymore? What will happen to sales of sports cars and other cars with sporty pretensions? This tech will surely start killing off individual types of vehicles and as such extend out to car brands.
corradoMR2 is offline  
Old 03-30-14, 04:46 PM
  #3  
Stormwind
Racer
 
Stormwind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

this analyst guy just crawed out from under a hole in a ground it seems, the auto industry already started consolidating...like 10 years ago.
Stormwind is offline  
Old 03-30-14, 04:52 PM
  #4  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,845
Received 111 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

hey, didnt we think 20-30 years ago that we would be be all in flying cars by now?

And how much did actually change in all these years?
spwolf is offline  
Old 03-30-14, 06:55 PM
  #5  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Forecasts a decade ago of auto industry consolidation haven’t come true.
When I first read the headline, this is exactly what I was thinking. Was a decade-old story being recycled? I seem to remember from the decade-old forecast that Fiat (and others that I don't remember) would be gone by now, yet it is still around.
Sulu is offline  
Old 03-30-14, 11:12 PM
  #6  
GSthe4th
Pole Position
iTrader: (1)
 
GSthe4th's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Ca
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

There are many issues that come to mind when I think of this topic and some of the commentary. Technology costs (see Tesla). At this point and time it's far from a company appealing and affordable to the masses. Perhaps over time as the technology is refined it could drive the costs down on petrol cars and trucks? The car industry is big business (will the unions go quietly) and the keystone pipeline could lower fuel prices? That oil $ is highly influential. Hell I can't even monetarily justify buying a hybrid with the price difference (in the car segments that currently interest me). Even with fuel prices the way they are. I have long postulated that we are being pushed in the direction of solar and renewable energy by the prices of oil, etc.

Six or so companies?? Wow.

Yes I am just throwing darts for fun.

Last edited by GSthe4th; 03-31-14 at 02:29 AM.
GSthe4th is offline  
Old 03-31-14, 01:03 AM
  #7  
gengar
Moderator: LFA, Clubhouse

 
gengar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NV
Posts: 5,287
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Trying to use Detroit automakers as an example of what might happen to automakers on a global scale doesn't seem very logical.

Poorly-written article overall, in any case.
gengar is offline  
Old 03-31-14, 01:53 AM
  #8  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,679
Received 156 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

For the last 35 years, this same topic and forecast comes up. I call it "empty noise."
Fizzboy7 is offline  
Old 03-31-14, 03:33 AM
  #9  
yowps3
Lexus Test Driver
 
yowps3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How much did Tesla pay to have their name all over this article lol?

Passive marketing at its best

-Isn't Moron Stanley also the advocates of $350 per Tesla share lol???

Last edited by yowps3; 03-31-14 at 03:46 AM.
yowps3 is offline  
Old 03-31-14, 10:44 AM
  #10  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,585
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Forecasts a decade ago of auto industry consolidation haven’t come true.

It hasn't? One merely needs to take a look at what happened to the extinction of Plymouth, Mercury, Pontiac, Eagle, Oldsmobile, Geo, Merkur, Hummer, and Saturn as divisions, and the departure of Isuzu, Suzuki, Saab, Sterling, and Daihatsu from the American market. Despite persistant denial from its managements, I would not be surprised to see Mitsubushi also leave pretty soon. Not only in the last 10 years, but also in the last 20, we have seen nothing BUT consolidation.

Last edited by mmarshall; 03-31-14 at 11:15 AM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 03-31-14, 10:58 AM
  #11  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,845
Received 111 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

These days we have:
Toyota - Toyota, Daihatsu plus partially Subaru and Isuzu
VW - Audi, VW, Seat, Skoda, Porsche
BMW - works with PSA and Toyota on powertrains
Renault/Nissan - JV
Mercedes - works with Renault on Engines, platform sharing.
GM - Killed Pontiac, got Daewoo.... Chevy, Buick, Caddy
Fiat/Chrysler - JV
PSA - Peugeot and Citroen JV, 10% owned by Chinese company.
Hyundai - Hyundai KIA JV

I dont see any of these big ones doing anything... what is left is Honda, Mazda and Mitsibushi, although M/M are pretty small players world wide.

Above we have 10 major manufacturers that will certainly not slim down at all, with their sales rising as well as profits. It is impossible for this to shrink down but maybe thats why author is using far reaching "15" years prediction, which is silly.
spwolf is offline  
Old 03-31-14, 11:17 AM
  #12  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,585
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
These days we have:
Toyota - Toyota, Daihatsu plus partially Subaru and Isuzu
VW - Audi, VW, Seat, Skoda, Porsche
BMW - works with PSA and Toyota on powertrains
Renault/Nissan - JV
Mercedes - works with Renault on Engines, platform sharing.
GM - Killed Pontiac, got Daewoo.... Chevy, Buick, Caddy
Fiat/Chrysler - JV
PSA - Peugeot and Citroen JV, 10% owned by Chinese company.
Hyundai - Hyundai KIA JV

I dont see any of these big ones doing anything... what is left is Honda, Mazda and Mitsibushi, although M/M are pretty small players world wide.

Above we have 10 major manufacturers that will certainly not slim down at all, with their sales rising as well as profits. It is impossible for this to shrink down but maybe thats why author is using far reaching "15" years prediction, which is silly.
You didn't list Tata Motors and their (now) ownership of Jaguar and Land Rover, since acquiring them from Ford. Would you now consider them a major manufacturer as well?
mmarshall is offline  
Old 03-31-14, 01:53 PM
  #13  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,845
Received 111 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
You didn't list Tata Motors and their (now) ownership of Jaguar and Land Rover, since acquiring them from Ford. Would you now consider them a major manufacturer as well?
Sure, but they are smaller than Mitsubishi and Mazda, plus they also wont fold into something else. Bigger is Suzuki Maruti which does 2.66 mil.

Just in time, bestsellingcarsblog has 2013 sales:

Pos Brand 2013 /12
1 Toyota 9.98 million 3%
2 Volkswagen 9.73 million 5%
3 General Motors 9.71 million 4%
4 Renault-Nissan 8.26 million 2%
5 Hyundai-Kia 7.56 million 6%
6 Ford 6.25 million 10%
7 Fiat-Chrysler 4.35 million 4%
8 Honda 4.10 million 7%
9 PSA Peugeot Citroen 2.82 million -5%
10 Suzuki 2.66 million -1%
11 BMW 1.92 million 6%
12 Daimler 1.56 million 10%
13 Mazda 1.32 million n/a
14 Mitsubishi 1.28 million 12%
15 Tata Motors 1.04 million n/a
16 Geely 0.98 million 8%
17 ChangAn 0.84 million n/a
18 Subaru 0.78 million n/a
19 Great Wall 0.75 million 21%

I could see Honda swallowing one of these smaller Japanese companies but how the heck do you get this list to 5? It is not possible as they are consolidated already and most of them are profitable except for PSA, and even they got cash infusion and change of ownership structure few weeks ago.

http://bestsellingcarsblog.com/2014/...w-catching-up/

Unless he expects nuclear war or gas reserves to disappear within those 15 years? :-)
spwolf is offline  
Old 03-31-14, 02:36 PM
  #14  
gengar
Moderator: LFA, Clubhouse

 
gengar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NV
Posts: 5,287
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
It hasn't? One merely needs to take a look at what happened to the extinction of Plymouth, Mercury, Pontiac, Eagle, Oldsmobile, Geo, Merkur, Hummer, and Saturn as divisions, and the departure of Isuzu, Suzuki, Saab, Sterling, and Daihatsu from the American market. Despite persistant denial from its managements, I would not be surprised to see Mitsubushi also leave pretty soon. Not only in the last 10 years, but also in the last 20, we have seen nothing BUT consolidation.
The article was talking about automakers, not brands.
gengar is offline  
Old 03-31-14, 09:22 PM
  #15  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,585
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gengar
The article was talking about automakers, not brands.
Yes, I agree, but sometimes the difference betwen the two can be quite murky and confusing. Take Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep, for example. In the space of just a couple of decades, they were totally or partially owned by four different overlords......Renault/AMC, Mercedes (Daimler), Cerebus, and by a combination of Fiat , the U.S. Government, and the UAW. AMC once owned Jeep....a part of Chrysler today, but not decades ago. Before Renault and AMC,, Jeep was owned by Kaiser and ******. GM, today, likewise, up to very recently when the government sold off its shares, was owned by a combination of the American government and the UAW. Yes, the auto-workers union (UAW) owns a big block of both Chrysler and GM shares. Union money contributed to the reorganization of both, though GM did not also have a foreign buyer like Chrysler did with Fiat.

Last edited by mmarshall; 03-31-14 at 09:28 PM.
mmarshall is offline  


Quick Reply: Morgan Stanley: Dramatic consolidation coming to auto industry



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:08 AM.