2014 Toronto Autoshow - Impressions and Disappointments
#31
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: WA
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Leather stitching doesn't make it on par with RLX. All you talked about is the look, and the look is subjective.
The overall quality of interior material, space, features, and technologies that wrap around the driver and passengers is what define luxury. Optima has nothing of those.
The overall quality of interior material, space, features, and technologies that wrap around the driver and passengers is what define luxury. Optima has nothing of those.
#32
I stand by my statement relative to depreciation. In the first few years of ownership, some of the flagship sedans depreciate less. Once you get to years 8-10, the price gap decreases significantly. The caveat is the LS which started at a much lower price in '06 than its counterparts. Do a quick search for '06 flagship sedans on cars.com and you'll see that all of the cars are priced in the $20K range.
Very fair; though, evaluating interiors for the most is subjective. I can only use pictures to judge as I'd never test drive an Optima or RLX. At the end of the day, I think most people agree the RLX is overpriced for what you get.
Leather stitching doesn't make it on par with RLX. All you talked about is the look, and the look is subjective.
The overall quality of interior material, space, features, and technologies that wrap around the driver and passengers is what define luxury. Optima has nothing of those.
The overall quality of interior material, space, features, and technologies that wrap around the driver and passengers is what define luxury. Optima has nothing of those.
#33
Man Acura's are underrated. Take the RLX for example, a really good car that not much know about. It's genuinely good.
And this is what I call a plush & luxury interior. No tacky detail, no chintzy feeling and it's not pretending to be something it's not. Just pure comfort.
And this is what I call a plush & luxury interior. No tacky detail, no chintzy feeling and it's not pretending to be something it's not. Just pure comfort.
#34
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: WA
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Saw the RLX last year and I thought it was a nice car too except the tail. I think what makes people less interested in this car is it's a FWD. With about the same money, one can get the GS for a better drive/handling. The look is subjective between the two. Another thing I remember reading is the design is nice but not that much nicer than an accord to justify the price difference.
#35
#38
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
Anywhoo, lets get back to the nice review….
#43
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#44
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In that case I'd choose the RLX over the ES. More powerful, more comfortable and better quality car.