Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

2014/2015 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-15, 08:04 PM
  #826  
dseag2
Lexus Champion
 
dseag2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 4,662
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

So many great coupes, so little time.
dseag2 is offline  
Old 04-07-15, 06:54 AM
  #827  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,033
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Just as I expected 3856# curb weight for C63 and 3924# for C63S, people actually believed this would be 3600# lol

http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/vehicl...nt=model-specs

However the option packages are way better than what BMW does. Lets you get some of the essential options without forcing you to get a $4000 package to get a backup camera. C63S is actually priced quite well. Despite the weight this has the best engine in this segment. Built a pretty nice C63S for $79.4k - LED lights, COMAND multimedia, AMG seats, blind spot.

Last edited by 4TehNguyen; 04-07-15 at 06:59 AM.
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 04-07-15, 07:58 AM
  #828  
TangoRed
Lead Lap
 
TangoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,585
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Agreed on the weight-I was saying the same thing. By the time a loaded model hits Car and Driver's scales I have a feeling it'll crest 4000lbs, putting it right in line with the RC-F.
TangoRed is offline  
Old 04-07-15, 08:54 AM
  #829  
GTSLEX
Lead Lap
iTrader: (2)
 
GTSLEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TangoRed
Agreed on the weight-I was saying the same thing. By the time a loaded model hits Car and Driver's scales I have a feeling it'll crest 4000lbs, putting it right in line with the RC-F.
It maybe inline with the RCF weight wise, but the C63S is putting out way more hp & tq.
GTSLEX is offline  
Old 04-07-15, 11:02 AM
  #830  
TangoRed
Lead Lap
 
TangoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,585
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GTSLEX
It maybe inline with the RCF weight wise, but the C63S is putting out way more hp & tq.
That much is obvious...was talking about weight. I mentioned the RC-F because its heft is frequently criticized.
TangoRed is offline  
Old 04-07-15, 12:33 PM
  #831  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,841
Received 110 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
Just as I expected 3856# curb weight for C63 and 3924# for C63S, people actually believed this would be 3600# lol

http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/vehicl...nt=model-specs

However the option packages are way better than what BMW does. Lets you get some of the essential options without forcing you to get a $4000 package to get a backup camera. C63S is actually priced quite well. Despite the weight this has the best engine in this segment. Built a pretty nice C63S for $79.4k - LED lights, COMAND multimedia, AMG seats, blind spot.
hah, look at that... and I spent last year reading german mags telling me how light C class was.
spwolf is offline  
Old 04-07-15, 12:38 PM
  #832  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,033
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

theres no way in hell it would be that light, an AMG GT which has extensive use of aluminum and use of CF is already 3400# and its 9" shorter than a C.

Despite RCF weight, the S does 0-60 in 3.9
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 04-08-15, 05:16 AM
  #833  
TangoRed
Lead Lap
 
TangoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,585
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

I'm a bit shocked at how fast the roof line seems to be. Rear window is quite small.



TangoRed is offline  
Old 04-08-15, 09:09 AM
  #834  
doge
Formerly Bad Co
 
doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
Just as I expected 3856# curb weight for C63 and 3924# for C63S, people actually believed this would be 3600# lol

http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/vehicl...nt=model-specs

However the option packages are way better than what BMW does. Lets you get some of the essential options without forcing you to get a $4000 package to get a backup camera. C63S is actually priced quite well. Despite the weight this has the best engine in this segment. Built a pretty nice C63S for $79.4k - LED lights, COMAND multimedia, AMG seats, blind spot.
Talk on the C63 boards says that 3856 is with the Pano Roof. Pano roof adds about 150lbs
doge is offline  
Old 04-08-15, 09:16 AM
  #835  
doge
Formerly Bad Co
 
doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
theres no way in hell it would be that light, an AMG GT which has extensive use of aluminum and use of CF is already 3400# and its 9" shorter than a C.

Despite RCF weight, the S does 0-60 in 3.9
That is considered a conservative #. In the right hands it can produce some better numbers, I believe C & D 3.7
doge is offline  
Old 04-08-15, 01:34 PM
  #836  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,033
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

what is that spy shot suppose to be, a C coupe?
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 04-08-15, 02:30 PM
  #837  
RXSF
Moderator
 
RXSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,044
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Not too surprised at the small rear windows. The S class coupe also has a very high belt line and the front and rear windows are pretty narrow as well. I don't see a pillarless design though....
RXSF is offline  
Old 04-08-15, 02:57 PM
  #838  
TangoRed
Lead Lap
 
TangoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,585
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RXSF
I don't see a pillarless design though....
And you won't at this price point- no change there. That's for the E-class coupe and above.
TangoRed is offline  
Old 04-09-15, 12:25 PM
  #839  
doge
Formerly Bad Co
 
doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
hah, look at that... and I spent last year reading german mags telling me how light C class was.
This is what the German website states.

http://www.mercedes-benz.de/content/...ta/models.html

So in Germany the C63s weighs 1730 kilos but that includes a fuel tank @ 90% full and a driver who weighs 68 kilos and 7 kilos of luggage.

In lbs that would be 3806 lbs - 165 lbs = 3641 lbs with gas at 90%

DOT weight isnt out yet..
doge is offline  
Old 04-09-15, 07:06 PM
  #840  
Stormwind
Racer
 
Stormwind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by doge
This is what the German website states.

http://www.mercedes-benz.de/content/...ta/models.html

So in Germany the C63s weighs 1730 kilos but that includes a fuel tank @ 90% full and a driver who weighs 68 kilos and 7 kilos of luggage.

In lbs that would be 3806 lbs - 165 lbs = 3641 lbs with gas at 90%

DOT weight isnt out yet..
I like how the Germans are doing this by listing realistic weights instead of dry weights with no fluids to try to make it look lighter than it should.
Stormwind is offline  


Quick Reply: 2014/2015 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Thread



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:28 PM.