Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

2017 Honda Ridgeline

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-16, 05:40 PM
  #121  
pvmike1
Lexus Champion
 
pvmike1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: California
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by islandbeef
A friend of mine is in the market or a truck. At the recent San Diego car show, we test drove a Tacoma and Tundra, very nice. The Ridgeline wasn't on display (dangit) but it's in serious contention. This is going to be a suburban truck, not a ranch truck, the Ridgeline doesn't need to be an F-150 clone and my friend doesn't live on a ranch surrounded by cattle.
Don't listen to the folks on here who have zero experience with the Ridgeline. It's a great truck.
pvmike1 is offline  
Old 01-16-16, 09:17 PM
  #122  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,330
Received 1,603 Likes on 1,021 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
A crew cab Tundra 4X4 has a payload of 1250-1350

A Double Cab Tacoma 4X4 has a 950lb payload

A Ridgeline AWD has a 1600lb payload.
Got it. You're comparing the lowest rated Tacoma and Tundra to the highest rated Ridgeline.

Tacoma payloads go up to 1620 lbs and Tundra up to 2060 lbs.
JDR76 is offline  
Old 01-17-16, 06:59 AM
  #123  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,478
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
Got it. You're comparing the lowest rated Tacoma and Tundra to the highest rated Ridgeline.

Tacoma payloads go up to 1620 lbs and Tundra up to 2060 lbs.
I compared 4 door 4WD Tundra/Tacos to the only configuration of doors the AWD Ridgeline comes in.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 01-17-16, 07:45 AM
  #124  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,330
Received 1,603 Likes on 1,021 Posts
Default

A 4WD Tacoma SR5 with 4 doors has a payload of 1175 not 950, at least for US spec. I'm still trying to figure out how the Tundra is in this discussion. Do you see it as a Ridgeline competitor?
JDR76 is offline  
Old 01-17-16, 08:09 AM
  #125  
Rhambler
Lexus Test Driver
 
Rhambler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 1,302
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I honestly thought about getting a Ridgeline as a second vehicle simply because it was one of the few trucks that had relatively large back seats and could still fit in my garage. Not sure how much longer the new one is, but the old one is about as long as my SWB LS. The crew cab Tacoma is just too long for my garage the way I have it configured (i.e., full shelves in the front). I think the Tacoma stretches out to 220 inches in crew cab configuration, too long for me.

Yeah, I personally thought the earlier generation one was weird looking, but it would work for my basic utility needs of hauling around small crap and actually being able to carry around three passengers comfortably, all the while being nicely tucked away from the sun in my garage.
Rhambler is offline  
Old 01-17-16, 08:14 AM
  #126  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,478
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
A 4WD Tacoma SR5 with 4 doors has a payload of 1175 not 950, at least for US spec. I'm still trying to figure out how the Tundra is in this discussion. Do you see it as a Ridgeline competitor?
I only mentioned the Tundra because it seem that people like to bash the Ridgeline a lot. But then load one up and you can in fact haul more payload when you select comparable trim levels.

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 01-17-16 at 08:18 AM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 01-17-16, 08:15 AM
  #127  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,330
Received 1,603 Likes on 1,021 Posts
Default

The previous Ridgeline was odd looking but still a great package. It looks like the new one will be even better.

As for the Tacoma, yes, it can be quite long. When I had mine, it was a full 4 door with the short bed. It did fit in my garage, but the same model with a long bed would have been difficult.
JDR76 is offline  
Old 01-18-16, 02:39 PM
  #128  
SethNaga
Rookie
 
SethNaga's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have ridgeline since 2008. it is a great car and a great truck. Pleasure to drive and maintain

Originally Posted by JDR76
The previous Ridgeline was odd looking but still a great package. It looks like the new one will be even better.

As for the Tacoma, yes, it can be quite long. When I had mine, it was a full 4 door with the short bed. It did fit in my garage, but the same model with a long bed would have been difficult.

Last edited by SethNaga; 01-18-16 at 02:45 PM.
SethNaga is offline  
Old 04-29-16, 12:55 PM
  #129  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default 2017 Honda Ridgeline boosts fuel economy by 5 mpg


The 2017 Ridgeline brings Honda back into the pickup segment later this spring, but the automaker has so far kept quiet about many of the new truck's specs. Thanks to the government, we now have fuel-economy ratings for the new model, and they compare well to the competition.

Front-drive versions of the new Ridgeline get 19 miles per gallon in the city and 26 mpg highway. If you opt for all-wheel drive, the numbers are a point lower, at 18/25 mpg. That's are a decent upgrade over the last-gen truck, which was only offered with all-wheel drive and had ratings of 15/21 mpg for the 2014 model year. The related Honda Pilot crossover, which was new for 2016, does a touch better, with maximum fuel economy of 20/27 mpg on a front-drive model with the optional nine-speed automatic.

Comparing the Ridgeline with the fresh crop of updated midsized pickups, the Honda fares well. For comparable models with a V6 engine, automatic transmission, and four-wheel drive, the Toyota Tacoma is the closest competitor, at 18/23 mpg. The Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon aren't too far behind that at 17/24 mpg. The Honda actually comes pretty close to the ratings of four-cylinder, rear-drive versions of its competitors, beating some on the highway.

Honda will exclusively offer the 2017 Ridgeline with a 3.5-liter V6 and a six-speed automatic. The company doesn't yet have powertrain specs, but the same engine makes 280 horsepower and 262 pound-feet of torque in the Pilot, so expect similar figures for the pickup. An in-bed stereo system is among the truck's innovative features.
http://www.autoblog.com/2016/04/29/2...onomy-ratings/
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 04-29-16, 01:09 PM
  #130  
chikoo
Lexus Champion
 
chikoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Look, it's the Honda F-150
chikoo is offline  
Old 04-29-16, 02:14 PM
  #131  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,746
Received 2,126 Likes on 1,378 Posts
Default

or a pilot without the back top.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 04-29-16, 03:52 PM
  #132  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,478
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Well done by Honda. Looks like a much better buy than a Tacoma.

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 04-29-16 at 06:47 PM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 04-29-16, 04:03 PM
  #133  
Aron9000
Lexus Champion
 
Aron9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 4,592
Received 28 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Well done by Honda. Looks like a much better by than a Tacoma.
I find the looks rather boring and borderline ugly. The new Tacoma is pretty damn butch IMO.

As for if the new Ridgeline is worth a crap, I'm sure its fine if your expectations are just to haul people and occasionally some mulch. Personally I can't stand the short dinky bed(or any other truck that FORCES you to have a dinky bed with the crew cab option), this is a truck, so it should be able to haul lumber, couches, weird/big/oversized items.

I'll be impressed with Honda engineers if this thing can actually tow a heavy trailer. The last Ridgeline really struggled with towing, the chassis was not set up at all for towing more than about 2000lbs, despite being rated for more. There was no way to attach a weight distributing hitch on the last model.
Aron9000 is offline  
Old 04-29-16, 05:14 PM
  #134  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Aron9000
I find the looks rather boring and borderline ugly. The new Tacoma is pretty damn butch IMO.

As for if the new Ridgeline is worth a crap, I'm sure its fine if your expectations are just to haul people and occasionally some mulch. Personally I can't stand the short dinky bed(or any other truck that FORCES you to have a dinky bed with the crew cab option), this is a truck, so it should be able to haul lumber, couches, weird/big/oversized items.

I'll be impressed with Honda engineers if this thing can actually tow a heavy trailer. The last Ridgeline really struggled with towing, the chassis was not set up at all for towing more than about 2000lbs, despite being rated for more. There was no way to attach a weight distributing hitch on the last model.
You want to tow with a FWD truck or (at best) a FWD-biased AWD system? It is just a FWD car-based SUV (Pilot) with the rear top lopped off.
Sulu is offline  
Old 04-29-16, 06:46 PM
  #135  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,561
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
or a pilot without the back top.
Originally Posted by Sulu
You want to tow with a FWD truck or (at best) a FWD-biased AWD system? It is just a FWD car-based SUV (Pilot) with the rear top lopped off.
We probably won't know for sure if it's just a restyled Pilot or not until Honda releases its tow-ratings, and then compare the two. I haven't actually seen the new Ridgeline's tow-ratings yet.....Honda hasn't posted them on the website, or, if so, I just missed them.
mmarshall is offline  


Quick Reply: 2017 Honda Ridgeline



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:58 AM.