Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

2017 Honda Ridgeline

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-16, 06:46 AM
  #91  
chikoo
Lexus Champion
 
chikoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
......unless, of course, the compartment seals wear out and start to leak in the rain or car wash. Honda, though, generally has a reputation of quality hardware in their vehicles.
Weather stripping on the roof, door and windows are exposed to the same elements.
I forgot to mention the trunk in a car. This is a trunk in the bed.

It should last.

Last edited by chikoo; 01-13-16 at 08:05 AM.
chikoo is offline  
Old 01-13-16, 06:51 AM
  #92  
chikoo
Lexus Champion
 
chikoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Truck for the metropolitan guy.
chikoo is offline  
Old 01-13-16, 10:02 AM
  #93  
venom21
Instructor
 
venom21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: ab
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Honest, unpretentious and not chasing bling, I love it.
venom21 is offline  
Old 01-13-16, 04:26 PM
  #94  
Byprodrive
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Byprodrive's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 2,173
Received 34 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
If I remember correctly, the Gen1 Ridgeline was advertised as being a Pilot with a bed. I have no doubt that this new Ridgeline and Pilot (and MDX) all share a common, basic platform, even if the Ridgeline has an integral ladder frame. Does this Gen2 model still have the integral frame, as the Gen1 model did?

Platform sharing means that they share many common components (usually the unseen, greasy bits); it does not necessarily mean that they share a common floorpan.

No problem with Honda selling such a "truck". Obviously, there are enough buyers out there who agree so that there is enough demand to make it economical for Honda to continue selling with a new model. I would not want to tow with the FWD model though, nor would I want to put too much stuff in the bed; I would not want to take too much weight off the front axle.


You want to avoid even weight distribution on all 4 tires?
Byprodrive is offline  
Old 01-13-16, 04:40 PM
  #95  
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
 
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 7,041
Received 96 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Looks much nicer than the previous version.

However, I'm still of the camp that thinks it's better to have more truck than you need than to have not enough truck.
FrankReynoldsCPA is offline  
Old 01-14-16, 08:37 AM
  #96  
pbm317
Lead Lap
 
pbm317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,891
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrettJacks
However, I'm still of the camp that thinks it's better to have more truck than you need than to have not enough truck.
This is the buying mindset of all of America. I want to be ready for that 0.0000001% use case scenario. And we tend to buy by the pound, or in this case, how much truck for the buck.
pbm317 is offline  
Old 01-14-16, 09:34 AM
  #97  
Aron9000
Lexus Champion
 
Aron9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 4,592
Received 28 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pbm317
This is the buying mindset of all of America. I want to be ready for that 0.0000001% use case scenario. And we tend to buy by the pound, or in this case, how much truck for the buck.
Well in the case of fuel economy, it makes sense to buy the bigger truck. Little known fact, but when the Ridgeline was on sale, a 4wd Chevy with the 5.3 V8 was actually more fuel efficient.
Aron9000 is offline  
Old 01-14-16, 10:07 AM
  #98  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Byprodrive
[/B]
You want to avoid even weight distribution on all 4 tires?
No, I want to MAINTAIN even weight distribution on all 4 tires. In a FWD truck I do not want to overload the rear axle and underload the front axle.
Sulu is offline  
Old 01-14-16, 10:50 AM
  #99  
pbm317
Lead Lap
 
pbm317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,891
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
No, I want to MAINTAIN even weight distribution on all 4 tires. In a FWD truck I do not want to overload the rear axle and underload the front axle.
I'm certain this is taken under consideration when they set the independent tow and payload ratings for the two drivetrains. So as long as you're operating within those, you will be fine in terms of the load/driving traction.
pbm317 is offline  
Old 01-14-16, 11:53 AM
  #100  
Aron9000
Lexus Champion
 
Aron9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 4,592
Received 28 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
No, I want to MAINTAIN even weight distribution on all 4 tires. In a FWD truck I do not want to overload the rear axle and underload the front axle.
Didn't think about it, but its opposite wisdom of putting weight in the bed of a RWD truck increases traction. With a heavier load you could potentially unload the front tires and have way less traction in the rain/snow or going up a slick boat ramp. Hopefully Honda engineers have accounted for this.
Aron9000 is offline  
Old 01-14-16, 12:13 PM
  #101  
pbm317
Lead Lap
 
pbm317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,891
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Aron9000
Didn't think about it, but its opposite wisdom of putting weight in the bed of a RWD truck increases traction. With a heavier load you could potentially unload the front tires and have way less traction in the rain/snow or going up a slick boat ramp. Hopefully Honda engineers have accounted for this.
Oh no they absolutely forgot about this. Crap!
pbm317 is offline  
Old 01-14-16, 12:16 PM
  #102  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,426
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Aron9000
Didn't think about it, but its opposite wisdom of putting weight in the bed of a RWD truck increases traction. With a heavier load you could potentially unload the front tires and have way less traction in the rain/snow or going up a slick boat ramp. Hopefully Honda engineers have accounted for this.
If the engineers have rated even the FWD version for a certain payload or towing capacity, on the stock suspension, at any given tire pressure, you can be at least reasonably certain that they have tested that combination under almost all normal driving conditions.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 01-14-16, 12:20 PM
  #103  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pbm317
I'm certain this is taken under consideration when they set the independent tow and payload ratings for the two drivetrains. So as long as you're operating within those, you will be fine in terms of the load/driving traction.
That's why I asked about tow ratings. The numbers given for FWD and AWD models are par for the course.

Originally Posted by Aron9000
Didn't think about it, but its opposite wisdom of putting weight in the bed of a RWD truck increases traction. With a heavier load you could potentially unload the front tires and have way less traction in the rain/snow or going up a slick boat ramp. Hopefully Honda engineers have accounted for this.
Originally Posted by pbm317
Oh no they absolutely forgot about this. Crap!
That's why I mentioned it. If the average Joe buys this instead of a real truck (to save fuel, because it's a Honda...) then forgets it's FWD, loads up the bed at the Home Depot on a snowy day, only to lose traction on the way home...

A FWD pickup truck is fine, as long as you remember that it is a FWD pickup truck.
Sulu is offline  
Old 01-14-16, 01:14 PM
  #104  
chikoo
Lexus Champion
 
chikoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pbm317
Oh no they absolutely forgot about this. Crap!
like this?


chikoo is offline  
Old 01-14-16, 03:11 PM
  #105  
pbm317
Lead Lap
 
pbm317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,891
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
That's why I mentioned it. If the average Joe buys this instead of a real truck (to save fuel, because it's a Honda...) then forgets it's FWD, loads up the bed at the Home Depot on a snowy day, only to lose traction on the way home...

A FWD pickup truck is fine, as long as you remember that it is a FWD pickup truck.
Automakers can only do so much, you can't prevent stupidity. A RWD performance car is fine, until the idiot that drives it in the rain forgets is a RWD 500+ HP vehicle and loses control of it over a cliff. All these, what if what if what if scenarios could go on forever.

The Ridgeline is a well executed vehicle, it won't win over staunch Full size pickup or hard off road enthusiasts, nor is it meant to. It successfully performs its intended function.
pbm317 is offline  


Quick Reply: 2017 Honda Ridgeline



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:20 PM.