Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

2017 Audi Q7 announced (post #47)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-13-14, 10:27 AM
  #61  
GS3Tek
Moderator
iTrader: (8)
 
GS3Tek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: so cal
Posts: 12,358
Received 162 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Maybe it's not fair to judge from the picture but that low height sure makes it look like a wagon than an suv

GS3Tek is offline  
Old 12-13-14, 10:43 AM
  #62  
Blackraven
Lexus Champion
 
Blackraven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Makati, Philippines
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

From the current pics, the exterior does not look any better compared to the current-gen model. It's not worse but it's not better either.

However, the interior is refreshing indeed......and upgrades such to the Bang & Olufsen sound system are most welcome.

There is a concern though:
-Base engine 2.0 TFSI engine to be released in Asia..........as well as America

^^^
I could understand maybe in the case of Asian markets with high displacement taxes and traffic congestion etc.................but a Q7 with a 4 cylinder engine in America?

Will Americans find it too underpowered?

I reckon that Volvo is also banking on a 4 banger unit for Stateside. An XC90 with a 4-pot engine might not be well received by majority of Americans................but we'll see.
Blackraven is offline  
Old 12-13-14, 11:58 AM
  #63  
cino
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
cino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: WA
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dropping 500LB on an overweight car isn't that hard. I would be surprised if they can do the same next gen. Remember that VW chassis are shared across the board from VW to Porsche. They at least have more incentive to make competitive chassis design.
cino is offline  
Old 12-13-14, 01:06 PM
  #64  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,676
Received 156 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

Agreed, it looks more wagon than SUV. Not sure if that's a good thing or bad thing. Maybe this particular model is lowered for the press pics.
I wouldn't worry too much about the 2.0 engine. Audi has one of the best and it keeps getting more horsepower regularly.
Fizzboy7 is offline  
Old 12-13-14, 01:20 PM
  #65  
doge
Formerly Bad Co
 
doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blackraven
From the current pics, the exterior does not look any better compared to the current-gen model. It's not worse but it's not better either.

However, the interior is refreshing indeed......and upgrades such to the Bang & Olufsen sound system are most welcome.

There is a concern though:
-Base engine 2.0 TFSI engine to be released in Asia..........as well as America

^^^
I could understand maybe in the case of Asian markets with high displacement taxes and traffic congestion etc.................but a Q7 with a 4 cylinder engine in America?

Will Americans find it too underpowered?

I reckon that Volvo is also banking on a 4 banger unit for Stateside. An XC90 with a 4-pot engine might not be well received by majority of Americans................but we'll see.
I hear that 2.0T is pretty potent
doge is offline  
Old 12-13-14, 06:08 PM
  #66  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,833
Received 104 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cino
Dropping 500LB on an overweight car isn't that hard. I would be surprised if they can do the same next gen. Remember that VW chassis are shared across the board from VW to Porsche. They at least have more incentive to make competitive chassis design.
this is now based on Tuareg, right? It also got huge drop in weight 2 years back since they moved it to unibody platform.I wonder whats the difference in weight between the two since Audi is using more exotic materials.

As to 2.0t, since it dropped a lot of weight, it will be reasonable... under 8.0 0-60.
spwolf is offline  
Old 12-13-14, 09:31 PM
  #67  
RXSF
Moderator
 
RXSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,042
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

current engine is 280hp. I think they can get the 2.0 up to about 250 which with the weight loss would give similar performance numbers. The TDI version makes do with 240 hp
RXSF is offline  
Old 12-14-14, 02:06 AM
  #68  
Blackraven
Lexus Champion
 
Blackraven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Makati, Philippines
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The 2015 Q7 will also get a 2.0 TFSI primarily in Asian markets and United States where it will put out 252 HP (185 kW) and 370 Nm (272.9 lb-ft).
I'm guessing that Audi is taking a page on what Ford has done with their Explorer...........which has 2.0 turbo for the front wheel drive model.

Car and Driver mentions that the Ford Explorer equipped with the 2.0 Turbo does okay.......but barely manages to keep up with the weight of the Explorer.

Oh and there is another concern: TOWING

Optional Class III Trailer Tow Package - - -
Configuration Axle Ratio GCWR Max Loaded Trailer Weight
3.5L TiVCT V6 FWD 3.39 9980 5000
3.5L TiVCT V6 4WD 3.65 10160 5000
2.0L TiVCT I4 FWD 3.36 6830 2000
3.5L EcoBoost V6 4WD 3.16 10400 5000
Unlike the V6 versions, the four-banger has less half of the maximum towing capacity.

I guess the premise here is:
If you're driving the car by yourself or with your family of kids, then I guess it's fine. BUT if you're towing and hauling heavy stuff, then avoid the four-banger.......UNLESS it is a Diesel.
Blackraven is offline  
Old 12-14-14, 02:59 AM
  #69  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,833
Received 104 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

obviously if you are towing you need larger engine, nothing wrong there.

But I found it interesting that 2.0l will be availble in USA but not in Europe
spwolf is offline  
Old 12-14-14, 11:12 AM
  #70  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

If they could ever manage to get the new Mustang 2.3 power to get 2.0 numbers in the Explorer they'd have a winner. As it stands a new 2.7L V6 is in the F-150 and Edge could always find it's way into more Fords. Would be nice to see Lincoln models that get these engines perhaps get special versions with more displacement.
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 12-14-14, 09:16 PM
  #71  
pman6
Racer
 
pman6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 1,903
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

fancy headlights and taillights won't distract from the boring look.

If they spent the same amount of time on the exterior as they did with the inside of the headlights, they would have made a better looking truck
pman6 is offline  
Old 12-15-14, 08:29 AM
  #72  
JessePS
Moderator

 
JessePS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: QC/FRANCE
Posts: 8,349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I must be part of the fringe. I honestly do not like what they did to this generation Q7. I do have to praise the weight loss though.
JessePS is offline  
Old 12-15-14, 08:41 AM
  #73  
Vh_Supra26
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Vh_Supra26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: LA
Posts: 5,037
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Audi RS Q7 digitally imagined





SQ7 already confirmed

X-Tomi Design decided to render the second generation Audi Q7 in the range-topping RS guise.

Audi's R&D boss Ulrich Hackenberg has already confirmed the all-new Q7 will spawn an SQ7 derivative and now X-Tomi Design decided to show us an even more powerful version that would be commercialized with the RS Q7 moniker.

While the SQ7 will combined a turbodiesel engine with an electric motor, the RS Q7 will likely make use of an uprated twin-turbo V8 4.0 TFSI delivering as much as 600 HP (441 kW), up from the stock configuration rated at 560 HP (412 kW).

Matching the increased horsepower will be a more aggressive styling with bigger vents, muscular wheel arches and side skirts, along with enlarged brakes and dual oval exhaust tips. Such a version would obviously come with a quattro all-wheel drive system and would tip the scales at around 2,200 kg (4,850 lbs) taking into account the new 3.0 TDI Q7 weighs 1,995 kg (4,398 lbs).

There's no word yet about an RS Q7 but if green-lighted for production, Audi will probably introduce it late 2016 / early 2017, approximately one year after the SQ7.
http://www.worldcarfans.com/11412158...tally-imagined
Vh_Supra26 is offline  
Old 12-15-14, 05:25 PM
  #74  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Audi's R&D boss Ulrich Hackenberg has already confirmed the all-new Q7 will spawn an SQ7 derivative and now X-Tomi Design decided to show us an even more powerful version that would be commercialized with the RS Q7 moniker.

While the SQ7 will combined a turbodiesel engine with an electric motor, the RS Q7 will likely make use of an uprated twin-turbo V8 4.0 TFSI delivering as much as 600 HP (441 kW), up from the stock configuration rated at 560 HP (412 kW).
Perhaps we'll get what we want after all
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 12-15-14, 08:17 PM
  #75  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,690
Received 2,097 Likes on 1,360 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GS3Tek
Maybe it's not fair to judge from the picture but that low height sure makes it look like a wagon than an suv
Originally Posted by Fizzboy7
Agreed, it looks more wagon than SUV. Not sure if that's a good thing or bad thing. Maybe this particular model is lowered for the press pics.
no doubt lowered for press pics, plus i expect this has BIG rims (maybe 20s) on it, which makes it look more like a wagon.

either way, the exterior is a giant snooze
bitkahuna is offline  


Quick Reply: 2017 Audi Q7 announced (post #47)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:12 PM.