Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Judge Says 'Bentley Car Kits' Infringe on Luxury Company's Trademark

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-13, 09:30 PM
  #1  
Harbinger
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
 
Harbinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lake Ray Hubbard
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Judge Says 'Bentley Car Kits' Infringe on Luxury Company's Trademark

If you couldn't afford a $200,000 Bentley, you used to be able to pay Matthew McEntegart, owner of Fugazzi Cars in St. Petersburg, Fla., for a car kit to make your Chrysler or Ford car look like one. In fact, the Internet is brimming with websites showing you how to transform a run-of-the-mill sedan into a luxury vehicle with molds made of materials like fiberglass and sometimes featuring fancy car logos.

But a judge has ruled that McEntegart and another Florida business owner must shutter its doors, noting that "Bentley car kits" infringed on Bentley's trademark and patent designs.

British luxury car maker Bentley Motors Limited sued McEntegart and Robert Frary III, owner of Keeping It Real Auto Customizing Inc., last year in U.S. District Court in Tampa, saying the two were counterfeiting and diluting Bentley's trademark and cars, including the Continental GTC Vehicle. Days later, Bentley and its subsidiary in the U.S., Bentley Motor, filed a preliminary injunction to block McEntegart and Frary from making, advertising or selling their kits.

John McGuire, an attorney for Robert Frary, said his client only painted the cars that had car kits already on them. He said Frary stopped painting them after he received notice of the lawsuit. McGuire said he was only paid to paint three cars with these kits, getting paid around $9,000 but making a profit of about $1,500 after supplies.

But now that the judge has ruled in favor of Bentley, the car company is asking for tens of thousands of dollars in damages, McGuire said.

Volkswagen Group of America, which owns Bentley, said they do "not comment on ongoing legal matters."

A hearing to help determine the amount of damages is scheduled for December.

"He's a small business owner supporting a family and has not done anything with Bentley Motors since learning they were not authorized," McGuire said.

McEntegart, who said he never took molds of actual Bentley cars, said he had disclaimers that they were not Bentley molds. He denies infringing on Bentley's trademark in his advertisements. He said he filed for bankruptcy because of the lawsuit and has been put out of business.

"Unfortunately, it boiled down to not having enough money to fight it," McEntegart said of the lawsuit. "You could keep a court battle going on for ten years if you wanted to. I was just a one-man shop, so it was easier to tuck your tail between your legs than fight it."

But McEntegart said he hopes to stay in the car kit business with his own body designs. He plans to release a new model next month, similar to a G35 Infiniti.

"It's nothing that looks like that, but it's using that as a donor for the chassis," he said.
http://gma.yahoo.com/judge-says-bent...ews-money.html
Harbinger is offline  
Old 10-11-13, 09:34 PM
  #2  
Harbinger
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
 
Harbinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lake Ray Hubbard
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

IMHO this sets a really bad precedent. Unless he was selling the finished product "AS" a Bentley, I don't see how this has been ruled against him. If it stands, what happens to all of the other kit car manufacturers, ie Factory 5 and all of those make your Fiero into a Ferrari kits?

Why stop there? This could legitimately extend all the way to companies that make replicas of everything
Harbinger is offline  
Old 10-13-13, 02:53 PM
  #3  
*Batman*
Lexus Champion
 
*Batman*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Harbinger
IMHO this sets a really bad precedent. Unless he was selling the finished product "AS" a Bentley, I don't see how this has been ruled against him. If it stands, what happens to all of the other kit car manufacturers, ie Factory 5 and all of those make your Fiero into a Ferrari kits?

Why stop there? This could legitimately extend all the way to companies that make replicas of everything
I think it is good. I don't like replicas. It devalues the original product and the IP. What's wrong with originality? There are plenty of aero kit manufacturers who make original stuff not replicas.
*Batman* is offline  
Old 10-13-13, 03:21 PM
  #4  
Jewcano
No Sir, I Don't Like It

iTrader: (4)
 
Jewcano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Jax, FL
Posts: 8,754
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I see nothing wrong with replicas baring they aren't claiming to be the real thing. In that sense its the highest form of flattery. When they try to claim to be the real thing, well that's another story altogether. As well, the real deal which can be out of most people's budgets, are the ones the wealthy will buy, not the replicas.
Jewcano is offline  
Old 10-13-13, 07:18 PM
  #5  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,518
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

I'm going to do something on this case I rarely do......not give a personal opinion, other than to say that there seems to be very good arguements on both sides.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 10-14-13, 07:41 AM
  #6  
Infra
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Infra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by *Batman*
I think it is good. I don't like replicas. It devalues the original product and the IP. What's wrong with originality? There are plenty of aero kit manufacturers who make original stuff not replicas.
Sorry, but you can't patent design. What's illegal is misleading consumers to think they are buying another product. There are many, many kit cars that have bodies that reproduce historical cars. Should these be illegal?

Allowing reproductions to be outlawed is an awful precedent. Nothing under the sun is 100% original, all design is influenced by prior art, as it can't helped but be otherwise. Every artist is molded by what they've seen.

More than just a slippery slope of outlawing all replicas, why stop there? The slope extends all the way to allowing someone to patent design on paper - that is, art.
Infra is offline  
Old 10-14-13, 12:58 PM
  #7  
I8ABMR
Lexus Fanatic
 
I8ABMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Waiting for next track day
Posts: 22,609
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

LOL I guess they were trying top make the ghetto Bentley look more like a real Bentley. Have to laugh at this.

Now he is in hot water with VWs legal team. I dont envy this dude
I8ABMR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hoovey689
Car Chat
27
05-30-17 05:34 PM
Gojirra99
Car Chat
16
05-12-07 10:51 AM
Gojirra99
Car Chat
4
07-22-05 12:03 PM
LexFather
Car Chat
37
05-03-04 04:02 PM



Quick Reply: Judge Says 'Bentley Car Kits' Infringe on Luxury Company's Trademark



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:26 AM.