NYC motorcycle gang ride altercation with family in SUV
lol
............
10-04-13, 02:09 PM
#393
Lead Lap
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes there is footage, not seen... Are you insane? it's not seen because the motorcycle retards didn't want to show what led up to this or what happened after they caught the RR driver.
These guys the motorcycle gang make Aaron Hernandes look smart, and that's a hard thing to do. If you have footage like this, burn it don't post it on the Internet.
These guys the motorcycle gang make Aaron Hernandes look smart, and that's a hard thing to do. If you have footage like this, burn it don't post it on the Internet.
10-04-13, 02:18 PM
#394
executive matchup
You can bet that IF the bikers had incrimminating evidence against the RR driver, it would have been posted on the internet by now. If the bikers want public support, NOW is the time to post the truth and turn the tide of opinion that is against them. The fact that they have not posted any evidence to support their statement shows that the video evidence they have condemns them as thugs and hooligans.
10-04-13, 02:28 PM
#396
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Going forward, do you think any law or other action could help prevent or alleviate these types of situations?
I believe it was a NY senator that mentioned on the news, that a law limiting the amount of motorcycle riders in a group will help. Your thoughts on the subject?
I believe it was a NY senator that mentioned on the news, that a law limiting the amount of motorcycle riders in a group will help. Your thoughts on the subject?
10-04-13, 02:34 PM
#397
Getting a driver's license should require basic physics understanding. Put a bunch of easy physics questions on the written exam, and that will fail most of these delinquents.
Christopher Cruz clearly slept through high school physics. It takes about 120ft for an SUV to decel from 60 to 0. That would mean a deceleration of 9.83 m/s^2 under hard braking.
What distance is required to stop from 60 to 40 miles/h under hard braking, knowing the deceleration?
Based on the formulas, it would require 66 feet to slow to 40 mph, and 0.91 seconds.
But we have to add 0.5 seconds reaction time.
Distance = velocity x time.
After the bike suddenly slowed to 40mph, the SUV had a 0.5 second reaction time, during which it was still driving at 60mph. Distance covered is 44 ft.
Add that to the 66ft required to slow to 40mph, and the total distance required for the SUV to slow to 40mph is 110 feet.
During that time, the bike covers 40mph x 1.41s = 83 feet.
This is a simplified calculation, but basically the SUV was given 83 feet to slow down when it needed 110 feet. Of course the SUV is going to clip the bike.
Even in the most optimistic situation, it would still tap the bike.
Verdict:
Christopher Cruz- retard
Alexian Lien- completely not guilty.
.
Christopher Cruz clearly slept through high school physics. It takes about 120ft for an SUV to decel from 60 to 0. That would mean a deceleration of 9.83 m/s^2 under hard braking.
What distance is required to stop from 60 to 40 miles/h under hard braking, knowing the deceleration?
Based on the formulas, it would require 66 feet to slow to 40 mph, and 0.91 seconds.
But we have to add 0.5 seconds reaction time.
Distance = velocity x time.
After the bike suddenly slowed to 40mph, the SUV had a 0.5 second reaction time, during which it was still driving at 60mph. Distance covered is 44 ft.
Add that to the 66ft required to slow to 40mph, and the total distance required for the SUV to slow to 40mph is 110 feet.
During that time, the bike covers 40mph x 1.41s = 83 feet.
This is a simplified calculation, but basically the SUV was given 83 feet to slow down when it needed 110 feet. Of course the SUV is going to clip the bike.
Even in the most optimistic situation, it would still tap the bike.
Verdict:
Christopher Cruz- retard
Alexian Lien- completely not guilty.
.
Last edited by pman6; 10-04-13 at 03:07 PM.
10-04-13, 02:58 PM
#400
Lexus Champion
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-04-13, 03:01 PM
#401
Lexus Champion
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Getting a driver's license should require basic physics understanding. Put a bunch of easy physics questions on the written exam, and that will fail most of these delinquents.
Christopher Cruz clearly slept through high school physics. It takes about 120ft for an SUV to decel from 60 to 0. That would mean a deceleration of 9.83 m/s^2 under hard braking.
What distance is required to stop from 60 to 40 miles/h under hard braking, knowing the deceleration?
Based on the formulas, it would require 66 feet to slow to 40 mph, and 0.91 seconds.
But we have to add 0.5 seconds reaction time.
Distance = velocity x time.
After the bike suddenly slowed to 40mph, the SUV had a 0.5 second reaction time, during which it was still driving at 60mph. Distance covered is 44 ft.
Add that to the 66ft required to slow to 40mph, and the total distance required for the SUV to slow to 40mph is 110 feet.
During that time, the bike covers 40mph x 1.41s = 83 feet.
This is a simplified calculation, but basically the SUV was given 83 feet to slow down when it needed 110 feet. Of course the SUV is going to clip the bike.
Even in the most optimistic situation, it would still tap the bike.
.
Christopher Cruz clearly slept through high school physics. It takes about 120ft for an SUV to decel from 60 to 0. That would mean a deceleration of 9.83 m/s^2 under hard braking.
What distance is required to stop from 60 to 40 miles/h under hard braking, knowing the deceleration?
Based on the formulas, it would require 66 feet to slow to 40 mph, and 0.91 seconds.
But we have to add 0.5 seconds reaction time.
Distance = velocity x time.
After the bike suddenly slowed to 40mph, the SUV had a 0.5 second reaction time, during which it was still driving at 60mph. Distance covered is 44 ft.
Add that to the 66ft required to slow to 40mph, and the total distance required for the SUV to slow to 40mph is 110 feet.
During that time, the bike covers 40mph x 1.41s = 83 feet.
This is a simplified calculation, but basically the SUV was given 83 feet to slow down when it needed 110 feet. Of course the SUV is going to clip the bike.
Even in the most optimistic situation, it would still tap the bike.
.
10-04-13, 03:31 PM
#403
Lead Lap
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Going forward, do you think any law or other action could help prevent or alleviate these types of situations?
I believe it was a NY senator that mentioned on the news, that a law limiting the amount of motorcycle riders in a group will help. Your thoughts on the subject?
I believe it was a NY senator that mentioned on the news, that a law limiting the amount of motorcycle riders in a group will help. Your thoughts on the subject?
Mandatory forfeit and sale of any bike driven without ID tags displayed or any bikes doing stunts on public streets and loss of driving privileges.
Confiscation and sale or destruction of all dirt bikes found on public streets etc,,,
10-04-13, 03:53 PM
#405
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
they (bikers) already broke many laws so i doubt more will make much difference. now maybe even more monitoring in places like manhattan will alert the police even sooner to break stuff like this up.
