Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
View Poll Results: What do you think about the new TLX?
I like it; I think it looks great.
32
36.36%
I hate it; it looks bland, boring, and ugly.
13
14.77%
I have mix feelings / It is just ok at best.
43
48.86%
Voters: 88. You may not vote on this poll

2015 Acura TLX Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-14, 05:58 PM
  #406  
yowps3
Lexus Test Driver
 
yowps3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The fans apparently prefer the N54 over N55 as it had twin-turbos. Opposed to a single turbo in the N55
yowps3 is offline  
Old 04-24-14, 07:08 PM
  #407  
jwong77
Pole Position
 
jwong77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 2,299
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Even after the N55 came out, they still produced the N54 in the 335is in a higher output form, 330hp I believe.
jwong77 is offline  
Old 04-24-14, 07:56 PM
  #408  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,844
Received 111 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SteVTEC
BTW, from personal experience, I think the "poor reliability" of German cars is a bit over-stated on here. I've had a few minor issues with my 335i, but had way more issues with my RAV4. Many of them are not even poor in Consumer Reports. Lots make at least average, which is pretty good, especially if you limit the techno gadgetry options, like headlamp washers and other junk. You can order a BMW as complicated and gadget laden as you want. But it's precisely all of that stuff that makes the cars less reliable. Order a simple one and surprise surprise, they're much more reliable simply because there's less to go wrong.
that doesnt explain why BMW gets rated among worst 10 in UK engine reliability or why any survey in Germany rates them bad, even if most models are sold with minimum equipment... it is very hard to find loaded 1 or 3 series, even 5 series in Germany.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/...ty-survey.html
spwolf is offline  
Old 04-25-14, 04:30 AM
  #409  
SteVTEC
Lexus Test Driver
 
SteVTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's just engine reliability. There are many many points of failure in a car. And even a "failure" in the engine category doesn't necessarily mean that you're stranded on the side of the road dead. Big difference.
SteVTEC is offline  
Old 04-25-14, 05:24 AM
  #410  
tex2670
Lexus Test Driver
 
tex2670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 9,958
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SteVTEC
That's just engine reliability. There are many many points of failure in a car. And even a "failure" in the engine category doesn't necessarily mean that you're stranded on the side of the road dead. Big difference.
I, for one, would not be interested in a car with an unreliable engine...
tex2670 is offline  
Old 04-25-14, 07:03 AM
  #411  
SteVTEC
Lexus Test Driver
 
SteVTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why don't we flip these engine failure stats around a bit.

Honda (1 in 344) = 99.7% are fine
Toyota (1 in 171) = 99.4% are fine
Mercedes (1 in 119) = 99.1% are fine
Lexus (1 in 101) = 99.0% are fine
Ford (1 in 80) = 98.8% are fine
BMW (1 in 45) = 97.8% are fine
Audi (1 in 27) = 96.3% are fine
MG Rover (1 in 13) = 92.3% are fine

Now what do you think? Would this even be a story had they presented the stats in this way rather than how they did? The same applies to Consumer Reports and their own ratings system. Gotta be careful. Lots of black dots doesn't necessarily mean "unreliable". It means less reliable than average, but the difference is often only a few percentage points of difference.

Back to the TLX.... Considering Acura's reputation for lousy transmissions, I'd be wary of a 1st year model simply because of the brand new trannys. I think Acura has learned their lesson by now, but there's definitely a lot of new tech in these cars that certainly isn't foolproof. Then again that's what a warranty is for... I'd prefer not to buy a first year model, but if my Bimmer's engine blows up and I don't feel like dealing with it anymore, I might very well find myself at an Acura dealership checking one of these out.
SteVTEC is offline  
Old 04-25-14, 07:51 AM
  #412  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It always tickles me threads about a GT3 or some other amazing car gets minimal responses but Camry, Civic, TL(X), Accord get 1,000 posts

While the Germans and now Lexus have moved to turbo 4 cylinders, the new TLX 4 cylinder still has no forced induction and gains a whopping 1hp or so over the TSX I-4 (I think it has more torque). Whats even more odd is they had a boosted 4 in the RDX years ago. Really weird they can't re-visit it and figure out how to make it more efficient as it made good power. The V-6 is now down 15hp compared to the last model, when everyone is at least staying where they were or moving up. Yes MPG is up but everyone else is adding more power and more MPG.

The RLX hybrid has been delayed since December and still no show and its nearly May.

Last edited by LexFather; 04-25-14 at 07:58 AM.
 
Old 04-25-14, 07:58 AM
  #413  
TangoRed
Lead Lap
 
TangoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,585
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by yowps3
The fans apparently prefer the N54 over N55 as it had twin-turbos. Opposed to a single turbo in the N55
It's not just because of the twin turbos, the N55 just has less tuning potential in general. It doesn't have forged internals like early N54 engines and it has valvetronic. The N55 was made for a better balance efficiency, emissions, and power.
TangoRed is offline  
Old 04-25-14, 08:00 AM
  #414  
yowps3
Lexus Test Driver
 
yowps3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TangoRed
It's not just because of the twin turbos, the N55 just has less tuning potential in general. It doesn't have forged internals like early N54 engines and it has valvetronic. The N55 was made for a better balance efficiency, emissions, and power.
Well there you go, N54 >>> N55
yowps3 is offline  
Old 04-25-14, 08:02 AM
  #415  
Allen K
-0----0-

iTrader: (4)
 
Allen K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,192
Received 584 Likes on 403 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexFather
It always tickles me threads about a GT3 or some other amazing car gets minimal responses but Camry, Civic, TL(X), Accord get 1,000 posts

While the Germans and now Lexus have moved to turbo 4 cylinders, the new TLX 4 cylinder still has no forced induction and gains a whopping 1hp or so over the TSX I-4 (I think it has more torque). Whats even more odd is they had a boosted 4 in the RDX years ago. Really weird they can't re-visit it and figure out how to make it more efficient as it made good power. The V-6 is now down 15hp compared to the last model, when everyone is at least staying where they were or moving up. Yes MPG is up but everyone else is adding more power and more MPG.

The RLX hybrid has been delayed since December and still no show and its nearly May.
Having test driven the RDX turbo 4, they should pretend like that engine didn't exist
Allen K is online now  
Old 04-25-14, 08:04 AM
  #416  
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
LexBob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 10,990
Received 137 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Allen K
Having test driven the RDX turbo 4, they should pretend like that engine didn't exist
Agreed. They were wise to move on.
LexBob2 is offline  
Old 04-25-14, 10:38 AM
  #417  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,284
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

The 2.3L Turbo should have stayed for the ILX as a Type-S model
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 04-25-14, 11:02 AM
  #418  
Joeb427
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joeb427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 11,670
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
The 2.3L Turbo should have stayed for the ILX as a Type-S model
I find it stupid that you can't get the 2.4L 201HP in the ILX with an auto and only a 6 speed manual.
The 2.0 is weak at 150 HP.
Joeb427 is offline  
Old 04-25-14, 11:10 AM
  #419  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,284
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Joeb427
I find it stupid that you can't get the 2.4L 201HP in the ILX with an auto and only a 6 speed manual.
The 2.0 is weak at 150 HP.
Wanna know something even more maddening? You can't even get Navigation on the 2.4L 6MT and Premium Package. Only the 2.0 5AT and Hybrid offer a Technology Package
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 04-25-14, 11:11 AM
  #420  
Joeb427
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joeb427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 11,670
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
Wanna know something even more maddening? You can't even get Navigation on the 2.4L 6MT and Premium Package. Only the 2.0 5AT and Hybrid offer a Technology Package
is right!
Joeb427 is offline  


Quick Reply: 2015 Acura TLX Discussion



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:59 AM.