Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

New J.D. Power Initial Quality Study puts Porsche, GM in spotlight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-13, 03:02 PM
  #1  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default New J.D. Power Initial Quality Study puts Porsche, GM in spotlight

New J.D. Power Initial Quality Study puts Porsche, GM in spotlight



J.D. Power and Associates has released its annual Initial Quality Study, and this year, Porsche and General Motors took the spotlight. The study, which asks new car owners to report problems experienced during the first 90 days of ownership, found that overall, the industry averages 113 problems per 100 vehicles.

Porsche managed a score of just 80 problems per 100 vehicles, while GMC took the second spot on the podium with 90. Lexus filled out the top three with 94 problems per 100 vehicles, followed by Infiniti at 95 and Chevrolet at 97. The study also looks at specific models, and found the Lexus LS to enjoy the best initial quality at 59 problems per 100 vehicles.

Interestingly enough, the report found that around two-thirds of most owner problems experienced in the first 90 days are attributable to vehicle design instead of mechanical failure. Specifically – echoing a refrain we've been hearing for the last few years – owners are having a hard time figuring out how to use the technology present in their new vehicles.

2013 Initial Quality Study
J.D. Power Reports: Nearly Two-Thirds of Problems Owners Experience With Their New Vehicle Are Design-Related; Few Can be Fixed

General Motors Receives Eight Model-Level Awards, including Five for Chevrolet; Porsche Ranks Highest Among Nameplates

WESTLAKE VILLAGE, Calif.: 19 June 2013 - The majority of problems owners experience with their new vehicle in the first 90 days of ownership are design-related rather than manufacturing defects. These design problems are far less likely to be successfully resolved at the dealership than are defects, according to the J.D. Power 2013 U.S. Initial Quality StudySM (IQS) released today at an Automotive Press Association luncheon at the Detroit Athletic Club.

The J.D. Power Initial Quality Study, which serves as the industry benchmark for new-vehicle quality, has been redesigned for 2013. The study has been enhanced to better measure the quality of today's vehicles, particularly problems related to new technologies and features now being offered. In addition, the study, now in its 27th year, allows for more detailed feedback from new-vehicle owners.

Nearly two-thirds of the problems experienced in the first 90 days of ownership are related to the vehicle's design, as opposed to components that malfunction. For example, the component may be working as designed, but owners deem it a problem because it may be difficult to understand or operate.

Because design problems are not the result of a breakdown or malfunction, just 9 percent of these problems are taken to a dealership within the first 90 days of ownership. When owners take their vehicle to a dealership for a design-related issue, the problem is fixed only 13 percent of the time. In contrast, 28 percent of owners who experience a defect or malfunction with their vehicle within the first 90 days of ownership take it to a dealership, and 42 percent of the time the dealership is able to fix the problem.

"Automakers are investing billions of dollars into designing and building vehicles and adding technologies that consumers desire and demand, but the risk is that the vehicle design, or the technology within the vehicle, in some cases may not meet customer needs," said David Sargent, vice president of global automotive at J.D. Power. "Keep in mind that automakers are trying to design vehicles that appeal to a broad array of consumers, and what works for the majority may not work for all. The successful companies will be those automakers that find a way to give customers the technology they want while at the same time making it sufficiently intuitive so all customers find it easy to use."

Overall initial quality for the industry averages 113 problems per 100 vehicles (PP100).1 The study finds that many of the problems owners have with their vehicle relate to the driver interface, which includes voice recognition or hands-free technology, Bluetooth pairing for mobile phones, and the navigation system, among others.

According to Sargent, some of these problems may be mitigated at the time of purchase by the salesperson explaining how to use the technology, and others may be remedied with software changes. However, features that are difficult for owners to operate, hard to understand, or inconveniently located in the vehicle likely will remain a problem for the life of the vehicle.

"Owners desire, and in some cases are demanding, more content in their new vehicles, especially technology-related features, and automakers are trying to provide it," said Sargent. "The majority of owners don't experience problems, but those who do are frustrated. That's understandable, especially when owners often keep their new vehicle for five years or more. In contrast, when consumers have a problem with their smartphone, they are likely to replace the phone much sooner."

2013 IQS Ranking Highlights
Porsche ranks highest among nameplates included in the study, averaging 80 PP100. GMC ranks second with 90 PP100, and Lexus ranks third with 94 PP100. Infiniti (95 PP100) and Chevrolet (97 PP100) round out the five highest-ranked positions.

Among the 26 model-level segment awards, Chevrolet receives five, while Honda, Kia, Mazda and Porsche each receive two. Chevrolet models receiving an award are the Avalanche (tie), Camaro (tie), Impala, Silverado HD and Tahoe. Honda receives awards for the Civic and CR-V; Kia for the Soul and Sportage (tie); Mazda for the MAZDA2 and MX-5 Miata; and Porsche for the Boxster and 911.

The Lexus LS ranks highest in the Large Premium Car segment and achieves 59 PP100, the lowest average problem level among all models in the study.

Also receiving segment awards are Acura TL; Buick Encore (tie); Cadillac Escalade; Chrysler Town & Country; Ford Mustang (tie); GMC Sierra LD (tie); Hyundai Genesis Sedan; Infiniti FX; Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class; Nissan Murano; smart fortwo; and Toyota Camry.

Plant Assembly Line Quality Awards
Toyota Motor Corporation's Lafayette B Plant (SIA) in Indiana, which produces the Toyota Camry, receives the Platinum Plant Assembly Line Quality Award for producing models that yield the fewest defects or malfunctions. Plant awards are based solely on average levels of defects and malfunctions and exclude design-related problems.

Among plants in the Asia Pacific region, the Toyota Motor Corporation Yoshiwara, Japan, (TABC) plant, which produces the Lexus LX and Toyota Land Cruiser, receives a Gold Plant Assembly Line Quality Award.

In the Europe and Africa region, Audi AG receives a Gold Plant Assembly Line Quality Award for its Neckarsulm, Germany, plant, which produces the Audi A4, A5, A6, A7 and A8.

The 2013 U.S. Initial Quality Study is based on responses from more than 83,000 purchasers and lessees of new 2013 model-year cars, trucks and multi-activity vehicles surveyed after 90 days of ownership. The study is based on a 233-question battery designed to provide manufacturers with information to facilitate identification of problems and drive product improvement. The study was fielded between February and May 2013.

The study is used by manufacturers worldwide to improve quality and by consumers to help them make more informed purchasing decisions. Throughout the years, initial quality has been shown to be a leading indicator of long-term durability, which directly impacts customer loyalty and purchase decisions.
http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/19/n...gm-in-spotlig/
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 06-19-13, 03:37 PM
  #2  
Fly4u
Banned
 
Fly4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Banned
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Some good news for GM! Just one lap in a long race to elevate the mfgr to a lofty level of satisfaction and durability.
Fly4u is offline  
Old 06-19-13, 05:47 PM
  #3  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,833
Received 104 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

90 day survey with 2/3 of the "problems" being "design" level
spwolf is offline  
Old 06-19-13, 05:58 PM
  #4  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,526
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Porsche managed a score of just 80 problems per 100 vehicles,
Not surprising. I just reviewed a new Boxster, and it was built like a Swiss Watch.


while GMC took the second spot on the podium with 90.

and Chevrolet at 97.
GM is clearly a different (and much better) company after the buyout/reorganization, though I still mourn the loss of what Saturn was in the 1990s, and how awfully corporate mismanagement ruined that once-superb division.

Lexus filled out the top three with 94 problems per 100 vehicles, followed by Infiniti at 95 The study also looks at specific models, and found the Lexus LS to enjoy the best initial quality at 59 problems per 100 vehicles.
Again, not surprising. Lexus, particularly the LS, has always done relatively well in this area, though some of its models went downhill after 2005-2006.

Interestingly enough, the report found that around two-thirds of most owner problems experienced in the first 90 days are attributable to vehicle design instead of mechanical failure. Specifically – echoing a refrain we've been hearing for the last few years – owners are having a hard time figuring out how to use the technology present in their new vehicles.
Sound like a broken record? I've been saying for several years now that many of today's cars (particularly upscale models) are simply getting too many complex video and electronic systems that distract drivers from keeping their eyes on the road.

Last edited by mmarshall; 06-19-13 at 06:01 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-19-13, 06:11 PM
  #5  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Again, not surprising. Lexus, particularly the LS, has always done relatively well in this area, though some of its models went downhill after 2005-2006.
I've addressed this as recently as today in another CL subforum. Yes in 2005-2006 or particularly the actual 2006/2007 models aka the L-Finesse, while design got sleeker, apparent cost cutting, materials and assembly took a major toll. Thankfully much was addressed in 2011-12+. I just love to use the 2006 ES330 vs 2007 ES350 comparison
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 06-19-13, 06:54 PM
  #6  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,526
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
Yes in 2005-2006 or particularly the actual 2006/2007 models aka the L-Finesse, while design got sleeker, apparent cost cutting, materials and assembly took a major toll. Thankfully much was addressed in 2011-12+. I just love to use the 2006 ES330 vs 2007 ES350 comparison
Some of that cost-cutting, particularly in Japanese-designed cars for the American market, was due to the Yen/Dollar exchange-rate. The dollar has been weak against the Yen for some years....and, as a result, we've seen penny-pitching in a number of Japanese-nameplate cars in the last several years.......with the 2008-2012 Impreza/Forester and 2012 Honda Civic being arguably the most noted examples.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-20-13, 11:36 AM
  #7  
trexlexus
Pole Position
 
trexlexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't want to sound like I am knocking Porsche's achievement, but it seems to me that it is much easier to maintain really high quality standards from a company that only globally produces around 130k vehicles a year. (Lexus sells almost twice that in the US alone).

Especially when that number is compared to GMC's monstrous 413k sold in the US alone. The fact that GMC is up at #2 speaks great volume about the company's quality.

Then again, Ferrari isn't produced in great numbers and it isn't hailed as the most reliable car in the world.

Even so, I think the survey should have been broken into a bit more segments for fairness issues.

Last edited by trexlexus; 06-20-13 at 05:59 PM. Reason: misspelled GMC
trexlexus is offline  
Old 06-20-13, 05:51 PM
  #8  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,526
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by trexlexus
Especially when that number is compared to GMcs monstrous 413k sold in the US alone. The fact that GMC is up at #2 speaks great volume about the company's quality.
Some of GM's most interesting cars, today, though, haven't really been on the road long enough to gauge long-term quality.....my Verano is one of them, though it has been previously sold in Europe as the Opel Astra and in China as the Buick Excelle. Unfortunately, we don't get a lot of reliability data from overseas here in America....only those Euro-designed models actually sold here.

Then again, Ferrari isn't produced in great numbers and it isn't hailed as the most reliable car in the world.
Even with what data we have, though, one of the few things we can say, though, about the reliability of Italian cars in general is that they have often ranked below average...in some cases, much below average.
mmarshall is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hoovey689
Car Chat
15
09-03-14 11:30 AM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
130
07-04-14 04:48 AM



Quick Reply: New J.D. Power Initial Quality Study puts Porsche, GM in spotlight



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:09 PM.