Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

2013 Toyota RAV4 XLE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-13, 06:05 AM
  #1  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default 2013 Toyota RAV4 XLE

According to this test, the RAV4 uses less fuel than the Mazda's SkyActiv CX-5.

I do not give out very many five-wheel ratings to vehicles and it turns out last week with the Ford Fusion Hybrid I gave the Fusion a five for its incredible 5.4 L/100 km achievement. The trend continues this week as well, but in a vehicle that is not a Hybrid – the Toyota RAV4 truly impressed.

Verified at the pumps over two tanks of fuel and nearly 1,000 km, the 2013 Toyota RAV4 averaged a stunning 7.3 L/100 km [32 mpg] for me during my week. This is truly remarkable! For comparison the Mazda CX-5 SkyActiv averaged a very impressive 8.0 L/100 km [29 mpg] when I drove it, but to be fair the Mazda was all-wheel drive.

7.3 L/100 km [32 mpg] in an SUV just blows my mind when we consistently average 6.9 L/100 km [34 mpg] in our Toyota Yaris. The RAV has bested most compact, subcompact and mid-sized sedans that I have tested and blew away any and all SUVs.
The new RAV4 interior looks more upscale than the previous generation, which looked kind of plain and boring.
...this RAV4, a very comfortable cruiser...

What you will notice immediately is the quick responding and smooth shifting six-speed automatic transmission. And with the RAV4 in ECO mode it is quick to shift up a gear to keep you in optimal fuel-saving mode. As I accelerated away from a light from 0–80 km/h at a constant increase in speed I noted the transmission shifted at almost exactly 1,750 rpm each time and cruising speed settled in at around 1,500 rpm.

In a hurry? Reach down, press the Sport button and rocket off the line. Sure this new RAV4 isn’t as fast as the outgoing V6 model, which truly was a rocket ship, but it is no slouch. With the front-wheel drive layout offered in my tester it is easy enough to peel off some rubber on takeoff if one chooses to.
Although some may have preferred the look of the previous generation, I like this new RAV4, it is clean and somehow looks smaller. I will say that it does look a little generic in a class of crossovers that are all starting to look the same, but the pointy nose sets it apart a little.
Note that the source article is a 4-day blog so you will have to read from the bottom up.

Source: 2013 Toyota RAV4 XLE
Sulu is offline  
Old 05-14-13, 09:04 AM
  #2  
PhilipMSPT
Cycle Savant
iTrader: (5)
 
PhilipMSPT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In rehab...
Posts: 21,527
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Since the engine is the same, can the six-speed tranny affect fuel consumption so significantly compared to the previous five-speed?
PhilipMSPT is offline  
Old 05-14-13, 09:06 AM
  #3  
Joeb427
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joeb427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 11,670
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

The wife and I looked at it.It's much better than the last generation.
I did like the blind spot and seat memory availability.
However,the wife liked the new CR-V more and I did too.
We had an '11 and the new generation CR-V is much better than the previous generation in every respect too.

Last edited by Joeb427; 05-14-13 at 09:13 AM.
Joeb427 is offline  
Old 05-14-13, 09:10 AM
  #4  
ST430
Pole Position
 
ST430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 2,300
Received 120 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PhilipMSPT
Since the engine is the same, can the six-speed tranny affect fuel consumption so significantly compared to the previous five-speed?
Unfortunately, the previous gen (4.3) was only a 4 speed, but still had great mileage and power nevertheless.
ST430 is offline  
Old 05-14-13, 09:21 AM
  #5  
PhilipMSPT
Cycle Savant
iTrader: (5)
 
PhilipMSPT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In rehab...
Posts: 21,527
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ST430
Unfortunately, the previous gen (4.3) was only a 4 speed, but still had great mileage and power nevertheless.
Ahhh...

Yes. 4-cylinder had four-speed. V6 had five-speed.

Forgot about that...
PhilipMSPT is offline  
Old 05-14-13, 02:02 PM
  #6  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Verified at the pumps over two tanks of fuel and nearly 1,000 km, the 2013 Toyota RAV4 averaged a stunning 7.3 L/100 km [32 mpg] for me during my week. This is truly remarkable! For comparison the Mazda CX-5 SkyActiv averaged a very impressive 8.0 L/100 km [29 mpg] when I drove it, but to be fair the Mazda was all-wheel drive.
I'd still choose the CX-5 over the Rav4. Agreed that the Mazda was AWD so it will get worse fuel economy. Also have to wonder whether the test used the CX-5 with SkyActiv 2.0 or 2.5 which would make a difference too
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 05-14-13, 02:47 PM
  #7  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,841
Received 110 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PhilipMSPT
Since the engine is the same, can the six-speed tranny affect fuel consumption so significantly compared to the previous five-speed?
ZR is pretty new engine too... 6 speed adds to that.
spwolf is offline  
Old 05-14-13, 07:46 PM
  #8  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
ZR is pretty new engine too... 6 speed adds to that.
We use the 2.5-litre AR engine here in North America.
Sulu is offline  
Old 05-14-13, 07:51 PM
  #9  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
I'd still choose the CX-5 over the Rav4. Agreed that the Mazda was AWD so it will get worse fuel economy. Also have to wonder whether the test used the CX-5 with SkyActiv 2.0 or 2.5 which would make a difference too
The SkyActiv technologies were supposed to be Mazda's answer to hybrid technologies -- similar excellent fuel consumption without the expense or complications of hybrid technology -- but it seems that it is not living up to the hype.
Sulu is offline  
Old 05-14-13, 07:53 PM
  #10  
84Cressida
Lead Lap
 
84Cressida's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I drove an LE last week. I thought it drove very nice and smooth with plenty of power. I also thought the handling was good for a crossover with a nicely weighted wheel and controlled body roll. The V6 can't be beat in refinement and power, but the I4 is no slouch in either.
84Cressida is offline  
Old 05-14-13, 07:58 PM
  #11  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
The SkyActiv technologies were supposed to be Mazda's answer to hybrid technologies -- similar excellent fuel consumption without the expense or complications of hybrid technology -- but it seems that it is not living up to the hype.
I wouldn't say answer if it's not battery vs battery. But certainly a fuel efficient powertrain
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 05-14-13, 08:00 PM
  #12  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 84Cressida
I drove an LE last week. I thought it drove very nice and smooth with plenty of power. I also thought the handling was good for a crossover with a nicely weighted wheel and controlled body roll. The V6 can't be beat in refinement and power, but the I4 is no slouch in either.
The V6 is no longer offered on the Rav4
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 05-14-13, 08:52 PM
  #13  
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
 
TRDFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PhilipMSPT
Since the engine is the same, can the six-speed tranny affect fuel consumption so significantly compared to the previous five-speed?
Apart from the tranny, I believe the engine has minor improvements as Toyota usually does.
TRDFantasy is offline  
Old 05-14-13, 09:31 PM
  #14  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I like the interior but the exterior leaves me cold. Not for me anyway

FE is impressive
 
Old 05-15-13, 03:56 AM
  #15  
SteVTEC
Lexus Test Driver
 
SteVTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
According to this test, the RAV4 uses less fuel than the Mazda's SkyActiv CX-5.
FWD in the RAV4 vs AWD in the CX-5, so apples to oranges.
SteVTEC is offline  


Quick Reply: 2013 Toyota RAV4 XLE



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:26 PM.