Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Toyota Announces $1.1 Billion Settlement

Old 12-27-12, 02:14 PM
  #16  
Joeb427
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joeb427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 11,670
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

and this woman's ES is probably still on the road without a problem.

http://blogs.insideline.com/straight...-the-road.html
Joeb427 is offline  
Old 12-27-12, 06:49 PM
  #17  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,514
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jewcano
That is what's wrong with this country, people are TOO sue happy even when its their own fault.
You can probably blame trial-lawyers as much or more than the population itself. Law firms often encourage it...they get a good chunk of the settlement-money. For proof, just look at the expensive cars and houses many of them own.

The highlighted part knocks out ALL logic. It was found they weren't guilty of SQUAT. Media gave light to people who held down the gas pedal instead of the brake pedal, who didn't try to shift to neutral, and blamed it ALL on Toyota. What was Toyota guilty of? Selling cars to people who had no business being on the road....
It still has to be reviewed and accepted by a Federal judge. If it was just that simple (and there is no fault at all on Toyota's part) then the judge may not approve it.

Last edited by mmarshall; 12-27-12 at 06:53 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-27-12, 08:26 PM
  #18  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Why would Toyota pay the fine and suggest a billion-dollar settlement and not admit wrong? Paying a fine or a court settlement does not necessarily mean that the defendant is guilty. It may be easier (and perhaps cheaper as well) to pay up front than to continue a (long) court battle. Pay up front to avoid going to court (in the case of the government fine) or avoid dragging out an extremely long lawsuit battle (years or even decades); and minimize damage to reputation.
Sulu is offline  
Old 12-28-12, 12:58 AM
  #19  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,833
Received 104 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
It still has to be reviewed and accepted by a Federal judge. If it was just that simple (and there is no fault at all on Toyota's part) then the judge may not approve it.
huh? thats not true. Judge will not look at who is right or wrong at all, just that lawyers settled in best interest of their clients.

Main point of the settlement is loss of value for people who decided to sell their cars in 2009 and 2010 and got lesser value from them.

It is those people who panicked thinking that their Toyota will fly away that Toyota wants to appease so they buy Toyota again.
spwolf is offline  
Old 12-28-12, 08:29 AM
  #20  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,514
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
huh? thats not true. Judge will not look at who is right or wrong at all, just that lawyers settled in best interest of their clients.
The judge certainly will if there is an appeal.


If this economic loss settlement is approved by the judge supervising multidistrict litigation (MDL) pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California,
Further, assuming any appeals are resolved in favor of the settlement,
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-28-12, 10:11 AM
  #21  
kt22cliff
Pole Position
 
kt22cliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

???? What appeal? This is/was a settlement. There can't be an appeal. A judge supervising the case "could" strike down the settlement but that's HIGHLY unlikely. That kind of stuff only happens if there were some grounds for gross negligence/fraud/criminal conduct not "oh I think this deal is not fair"

Originally Posted by mmarshall
The judge certainly will if there is an appeal.
kt22cliff is offline  
Old 12-28-12, 11:15 AM
  #22  
Big Andy
Pole Position
 
Big Andy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,795
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I think this is just Toyota taking a pragmatic view and agreeing a figure that will probably work out cheaper in the long run than letting this rumble on.
Big Andy is offline  
Old 12-29-12, 08:44 AM
  #23  
natnut
Pole Position
 
natnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,602
Received 87 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Joeb427
To finally make it all go away.
THIS.

Even though Toyota was never at fault, it's thinking long-term. Rather than a long drawn-out messy legal battle which it should win, it's taking decisive steps to put this behind itself so that it can focus its attention and energies on building better cars.
natnut is offline  
Old 12-29-12, 09:29 AM
  #24  
Jewcano
No Sir, I Don't Like It

iTrader: (4)
 
Jewcano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Jax, FL
Posts: 8,754
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by natnut
THIS.

Even though Toyota was never at fault, it's thinking long-term. Rather than a long drawn-out messy legal battle which it should win, it's taking decisive steps to put this behind itself so that it can focus its attention and energies on building better cars.
That's the sad part.....they should've sued the media outlets that gave them a bad name. Last I heard defamation in this country is illegal.
Jewcano is offline  
Old 12-30-12, 01:32 PM
  #25  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,514
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kt22cliff
???? What appeal? This is/was a settlement. There can't be an appeal. A judge supervising the case "could" strike down the settlement but that's HIGHLY unlikely. That kind of stuff only happens if there were some grounds for gross negligence/fraud/criminal conduct not "oh I think this deal is not fair"
I was only quoting the article (not necessarily my own view), and how the author presented the details of the case. He (or she) apparantly knows more about it than we do....that person has probably seen the actual documents.

Further, assuming any appeals are resolved in favor of the settlement,
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-31-12, 09:41 PM
  #26  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default Why everyone loses but the lawyers in Toyota's unintended acceleration settlement

Why everyone loses but the lawyers in Toyota's unintended acceleration settlement



The Toyota settlement recently submitted to US District Judge James Selna for approval will cost the company anywhere from $1 billion to $1.4 billion. All to settle the class-action suit brought against it for economic losses stemming from claims of unintended acceleration. This suit only addresses the perceived loss-of-value that Toyota owners and lessees feel they have suffered, alleging their cars were the victims of unintended depreciation even if they did not directly suffer from the alleged cases of unintended/sudden acceleration. This is a separate case than the wrongful death suits brought about by the unintended acceleration brouhaha.

When the settlement was announced, this was the overview of its payouts:
  • Toyota will install brake override systems in all 3.25 million vehicles subjected to the floor mat entrapment recall.
  • Another fund of $250 million will compensate current owners whose vehicles are not eligible for the free brake override system.
  • A fund of $250 million will compensate former Toyota owners who sold their cars from September 1, 2009 through December 31, 2010 for lost value.
  • Education grants valued at $30 million will be made to independent academic institutions to further study auto safety and enhance driver education.
  • All 16 million current Toyota owners will be eligible for a customer care plan that warrants certain parts allegedly related to unintended acceleration for three to 10 years.

Car and Driver attempts to break down where all that largesse is going, and who's going to get large off of it. We'll start from the top. Having something like three million cars run through service departments to have brake override systems fitted with Toyota stumping up the cash, is probably a win for dealerships and suppliers and even Toyota, obliquely, according to the report. The $250-million fund to reimburse owners whose cars can't be fitted with brake override systems will see each owner get a check for anywhere from $37.50 to $125 depending on the specifics of the model in question. Nobody wins that one.

The $250 million earmarked to compensate owners and lessees for lost value might end up being disbursed to millions of people and institutions, with estimates for individual payouts being from "hundreds of dollars to over a thousand dollars." The paucity of the payout doesn't just reflect the number of payees, it also reflects the near impossibility of an owner being able to determine and prove having suffered a specific amount of financial pain beyond standard depreciation. If anyone gets a trophy from that one, Car and Driver figures it's large used car dealers who moved a lot of Toyota metal during the time span.

Of the $30 million allotted for studies, up to $15 million will go to university studies of safety technology, another $800,000 going specifically to a university that will study "critical gaps in awareness and practice regarding defensive driving skills" including "driver pedal misapplication." The results from that study will be broadcast to the nation via a public safety campaign that will use some portion of the leftover $14.2 million dollars. Obviously, universities and advertising media make out all right with this, and hey, maybe we can all benefit from more research into safety technology.

The reporting doesn't address the extended customer care plan, but since the causes of alleged unintended acceleration haven't gone beyond suppositions of floor mats and pedal misapplication, and since the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and NASA cleared the vehicles of any defects causative of unintended acceleration, good luck getting that warranty honored. Unless you need new floor mats in 2022.

That gets us up to a potential spend of $530 million so far, plus the cost of the brake override fitment. On top of that is another $200 million going to the 85 attorneys at 25 law firms for fees, plus another potential $27 million for their expenses. If the two hundred mil were split evenly among the 85 (it won't be – it will be disbursed to each according to their effort), that would make each advocate worth more than $2.35 million. And that's before expenses. It's pretty clear who wins that one, isn't it?

And assuming the settlement is approved by the judge, you'd have to figure Toyota wins. The company is about to be declared the largest automaker in the world again and it's predicting record sales for 2013. It could enter 2013 with this part of the ugly episode behind it and using money that has been saved just for the purpose. Not only that, the proposed settlement is less money than outsiders were expecting – word of the estimates actually sent Toyota's stock price up. So some things, like a few lawyers' bonuses, would change, otherwise much has remained just the same...

http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/31/w...tended-accele/
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 01-02-13, 11:52 AM
  #27  
Infra
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Infra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Jewcano
If the media never blew out of proportion peoples mistakes and blamed it on Toyota, Toyota wouldn't have had this issue in the first place. This was a witch hunt from the get-go.
Did you even read the link?

It's payment for economic loss due to recalls. Whether or not there was an issue, consumers took losses on vehicles sold because of the recalls, as well as other issues, all brought together into a class-action lawsuit.
Infra is offline  
Old 03-07-13, 04:48 PM
  #28  
anoopster
Driver School Candidate
 
anoopster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: ca
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Getting $125 back

Well I got this postcard last week in the mail regarding the Toyota Settlement. Easy to be thrown out in the junk mail pile and had incredibly small text and not easy to read.
It seemed to indicate that my 1999 GS400 was one of the vehicles included in this class action settlement. Never experienced any problems but I followed the poorly written instructions and went to the website. Looks like they will be sending me a check for $125 !

I'm guessing that for someone who actually did have the problem, their settlement would be much greater. Not sure if I deserve it but it pays for a couple tanks of gas. I don't expect the money any time soon but it will be a nice "present" when I ultimately do get it months from now.

Keep an eye out for that postcard and you may want to update your info with Toyota/Lexus. Good Luck!
anoopster is offline  
Old 03-11-13, 07:00 PM
  #29  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm getting a postcard every day lol...
 
Old 03-20-13, 09:53 AM
  #30  
SPRTNYDSN
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
SPRTNYDSN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Any updates on receiving a check? I was allowed 125.00 from the www.toyotaelsettlement.com.
SPRTNYDSN is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Toyota Announces $1.1 Billion Settlement



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:09 PM.