Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

First Drive: 2014 Mazda6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-12, 07:34 AM
  #16  
BoDarville
Intermediate
 
BoDarville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ga
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

no V6 option? mistake
BoDarville is offline  
Old 10-07-12, 08:12 AM
  #17  
Blackraven
Lexus Champion
 
Blackraven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Makati, Philippines
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

^^^
You were asking for the 3.7 liter V6 Cyclone engine then.

I guess the contract between Mazda and Ford for that engine has expired (if there's any indication)

---------------------------
Anyways, this Mazda 6 can be related to the sporty underdog.

Very dynamic and inspiring not just in looks and the feel but also in the drive.

The sad thing though is that most buyers in this segment purchase on familiarity and practicality. Anything that is strictly based on sporty driving and dynamism is not in the target market's criteria.......and this is why the previous-gen Mazda 6 sold quite few numbers (despite having superb and dynamic styling in this segment).

Then again, Mazda was never about sales dominance but more of creating cars that are dynamic and inspiring.

With that said, I really want Mazda to live on and continue producing these kinds of vehicles. I guess others out there feel the same way.

Go Mazda
Blackraven is offline  
Old 10-07-12, 11:26 AM
  #18  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Forum Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,310
Received 126 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

As long as they can offer a Turbo 4 in place of a V6 it should be ok. Only offering a 2.5L 5 would be the mistake
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 10-07-12, 01:06 PM
  #19  
chikoo
Lexus Champion
 
chikoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Actually, the 2003 Mazda6 sold really nice. the second generation fell flat in the face due to the bloated size, and questionable styling.
This 3rd generation looks like it will get back Mazda6 in it's comfort zone.
will it beat toyota/honda. probably not.
chikoo is offline  
Old 10-07-12, 02:07 PM
  #20  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Forum Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,310
Received 126 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chikoo
Actually, the 2003 Mazda6 sold really nice. the second generation fell flat in the face due to the bloated size, and questionable styling.
This 3rd generation looks like it will get back Mazda6 in it's comfort zone.
will it beat toyota/honda. probably not.
I agree with most of this. First gen never sold in Camry or Accord or even Altima numbers but it was by far the "BMW" of the group. Come second gen and it was decently styled and had a nice interior but the lack of configurations other than 2.5L I4 or 3.7L V6 both with FWD 6-auto or 6-manual sedan body styles. By comparison the First gen had I4, V6, turbo 4. Manual, auto, FWD, AWD, sedan, hatch, and watch. If Mazda were to give this new gen AWD and turbo I'd sign the papers right away

And yeah it won't beat Toyota/Honda/Nissan/Kia/Hyundai/Ford/VW in numbers but it is an excellent package with the lowest weight in class. If Mazda continues this trend, they might bob above the radar. I'm rooting for them
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 10-07-12, 08:12 PM
  #21  
Tantrix
Lead Lap
 
Tantrix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: ny
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I am not impressed with the actual car now that I see rear world pics.

they should not have touched the concept! This car is equivalent in design to the nissan altima.

Hyundai sonata, kia optima, ford fusion and chevy malibu so far lead the top 4 spots in the mid sized category IMO.
Tantrix is offline  
Old 10-07-12, 08:15 PM
  #22  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Forum Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,310
Received 126 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tantrix
I am not impressed with the actual car now that I see rear world pics.

they should not have touched the concept! This car is equivalent in design to the nissan altima.

Hyundai sonata, kia optima, ford fusion and chevy malibu so far lead the top 4 spots in the mid sized category IMO.
Takeri and Shinari were both out waaay before the Altima bowed
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 10-07-12, 08:48 PM
  #23  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,926
Received 161 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tantrix
I am not impressed with the actual car now that I see rear world pics.

they should not have touched the concept! This car is equivalent in design to the nissan altima.

Hyundai sonata, kia optima, ford fusion and chevy malibu so far lead the top 4 spots in the mid sized category IMO.
chevy malibu was rated worst in any review that was made.
spwolf is offline  
Old 10-07-12, 08:49 PM
  #24  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,926
Received 161 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
As long as they can offer a Turbo 4 in place of a V6 it should be ok. Only offering a 2.5L 5 would be the mistake
it doesnt need turbo... it needs good 2.5l engine and it seems like new skyactive engine with around 190hp will do it good.
spwolf is offline  
Old 10-07-12, 09:08 PM
  #25  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Forum Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,310
Received 126 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
it doesnt need turbo... it needs good 2.5l engine and it seems like new skyactive engine with around 190hp will do it good.
Disagree. 2.5 is a great base engine. But there needs to be a stronger option here in America
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 10-07-12, 09:12 PM
  #26  
TF109B
Lexus Champion
 
TF109B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,266
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

There will be at a later date, I'm sure of it.
TF109B is offline  
Old 10-07-12, 09:48 PM
  #27  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,926
Received 161 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
Disagree. 2.5 is a great base engine. But there needs to be a stronger option here in America
for mag reviews sure, but 90% would get 190hp 2.5l...

it would be best if they would do proper MPS version then.
spwolf is offline  
Old 10-08-12, 12:46 AM
  #28  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Forum Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,310
Received 126 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
for mag reviews sure, but 90% would get 190hp 2.5l...

it would be best if they would do proper MPS version then.
That's fine. Similar to how Audi positions A and S.

Despite the masses social opinion and current gas prices there's still people like me who care more about power than efficiency
Hoovey689 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hoovey689
Car Chat
53
01-22-14 11:26 AM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
29
11-25-13 05:27 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
19
03-18-13 11:23 AM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
3
11-12-12 08:34 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
1
11-07-12 12:05 PM



Quick Reply: First Drive: 2014 Mazda6



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:41 AM.