First Drive: 2014 Mazda6 - Page 2 - Club Lexus Forums

Log In 

First Drive: 2014 Mazda6

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-07-12, 07:34 AM   #16
BoDarville
Driver
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ga
Posts: 166
Default

no V6 option? mistake
BoDarville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-12, 08:12 AM   #17
Blackraven
Lexus Champion
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Makati, Philippines
Posts: 3,459
Default

^^^
You were asking for the 3.7 liter V6 Cyclone engine then.

I guess the contract between Mazda and Ford for that engine has expired (if there's any indication)

---------------------------
Anyways, this Mazda 6 can be related to the sporty underdog.

Very dynamic and inspiring not just in looks and the feel but also in the drive.

The sad thing though is that most buyers in this segment purchase on familiarity and practicality. Anything that is strictly based on sporty driving and dynamism is not in the target market's criteria.......and this is why the previous-gen Mazda 6 sold quite few numbers (despite having superb and dynamic styling in this segment).

Then again, Mazda was never about sales dominance but more of creating cars that are dynamic and inspiring.

With that said, I really want Mazda to live on and continue producing these kinds of vehicles. I guess others out there feel the same way.

Go Mazda
Blackraven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-12, 11:26 AM   #18
Hoovey2411
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey2411's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 33,531
Default

As long as they can offer a Turbo 4 in place of a V6 it should be ok. Only offering a 2.5L 5 would be the mistake
Hoovey2411 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-12, 01:06 PM   #19
chikoo
Lexus Champion
 
chikoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 3,607
Default

Actually, the 2003 Mazda6 sold really nice. the second generation fell flat in the face due to the bloated size, and questionable styling.
This 3rd generation looks like it will get back Mazda6 in it's comfort zone.
will it beat toyota/honda. probably not.
chikoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-12, 02:07 PM   #20
Hoovey2411
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey2411's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 33,531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chikoo View Post
Actually, the 2003 Mazda6 sold really nice. the second generation fell flat in the face due to the bloated size, and questionable styling.
This 3rd generation looks like it will get back Mazda6 in it's comfort zone.
will it beat toyota/honda. probably not.
I agree with most of this. First gen never sold in Camry or Accord or even Altima numbers but it was by far the "BMW" of the group. Come second gen and it was decently styled and had a nice interior but the lack of configurations other than 2.5L I4 or 3.7L V6 both with FWD 6-auto or 6-manual sedan body styles. By comparison the First gen had I4, V6, turbo 4. Manual, auto, FWD, AWD, sedan, hatch, and watch. If Mazda were to give this new gen AWD and turbo I'd sign the papers right away

And yeah it won't beat Toyota/Honda/Nissan/Kia/Hyundai/Ford/VW in numbers but it is an excellent package with the lowest weight in class. If Mazda continues this trend, they might bob above the radar. I'm rooting for them
Hoovey2411 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-12, 08:12 PM   #21
Tantrix
Pole Position
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: ny
Posts: 363
Default

I am not impressed with the actual car now that I see rear world pics.

they should not have touched the concept! This car is equivalent in design to the nissan altima.

Hyundai sonata, kia optima, ford fusion and chevy malibu so far lead the top 4 spots in the mid sized category IMO.
Tantrix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-12, 08:15 PM   #22
Hoovey2411
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey2411's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 33,531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tantrix View Post
I am not impressed with the actual car now that I see rear world pics.

they should not have touched the concept! This car is equivalent in design to the nissan altima.

Hyundai sonata, kia optima, ford fusion and chevy malibu so far lead the top 4 spots in the mid sized category IMO.
Takeri and Shinari were both out waaay before the Altima bowed
Hoovey2411 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-12, 08:48 PM   #23
spwolf
Lexus Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tantrix View Post
I am not impressed with the actual car now that I see rear world pics.

they should not have touched the concept! This car is equivalent in design to the nissan altima.

Hyundai sonata, kia optima, ford fusion and chevy malibu so far lead the top 4 spots in the mid sized category IMO.
chevy malibu was rated worst in any review that was made.
spwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-12, 08:49 PM   #24
spwolf
Lexus Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoovey2411 View Post
As long as they can offer a Turbo 4 in place of a V6 it should be ok. Only offering a 2.5L 5 would be the mistake
it doesnt need turbo... it needs good 2.5l engine and it seems like new skyactive engine with around 190hp will do it good.
spwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-12, 09:08 PM   #25
Hoovey2411
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey2411's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 33,531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spwolf View Post
it doesnt need turbo... it needs good 2.5l engine and it seems like new skyactive engine with around 190hp will do it good.
Disagree. 2.5 is a great base engine. But there needs to be a stronger option here in America
Hoovey2411 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-12, 09:12 PM   #26
TF109B
Lexus Champion
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,142
Default

There will be at a later date, I'm sure of it.
TF109B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-12, 09:48 PM   #27
spwolf
Lexus Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoovey2411 View Post
Disagree. 2.5 is a great base engine. But there needs to be a stronger option here in America
for mag reviews sure, but 90% would get 190hp 2.5l...

it would be best if they would do proper MPS version then.
spwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-12, 12:46 AM   #28
Hoovey2411
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey2411's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 33,531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spwolf View Post
for mag reviews sure, but 90% would get 190hp 2.5l...

it would be best if they would do proper MPS version then.
That's fine. Similar to how Audi positions A and S.

Despite the masses social opinion and current gas prices there's still people like me who care more about power than efficiency
Hoovey2411 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Review: 2014 Mazda3 Hoovey2411 Car Chat 8 04-09-14 02:24 PM
2014 Mazda6 to start at $20,880* Hoovey2411 Car Chat 45 07-26-13 04:31 PM
First Drive: 2014 Mazda3 Hoovey2411 Car Chat 20 07-15-13 05:22 PM
2013 Mazda CX-9 gets all Kodo-fied Hoovey2411 Car Chat 15 02-04-13 03:52 PM
2013 Mazda CX-5 Hoovey2411 Car Chat 14 09-08-11 11:27 AM


Tags
2014, door, drive, heaven, is350, lexus, mazda, mazda6, powered, pulling, screen, sound, test, vbulletin, walk

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:45 AM.


Copyright © 2000-2016 Internet Brands, Inc. All Rights Reserved