Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Toyota to OverHaul Engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-13, 10:09 PM
  #61  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SteVTEC
That was pretty much my original point. It's tough to go wrong with a simple naturally aspirated engine with the latest technologies, giving you a substantial boost in fuel mileage at a fraction of the cost of other more elaborate tech (diesels, hybrids, etc). Although even direct injection isn't foolproof as I still don't think they've resolved the carbon buildup issues with that technology, besides Toyota's dual injection approach but which is far more costly. All of this is the hidden cost of the new EPA fuel mileage requirements. Cars today are just plain going to be a lot harder and more costly to maintain 10 years out than today's 10 year old cars. I'm certainly not expecting either of our turbo Bimmers to make it to 100k miles without needing major repairs. But considering that even Honda Accords are direct injected now, could you expect one of those to make it to high mileage without needing a head cleaning/rebuilding from carbon build-up?
This is why maybe this fancy technology shouldn't be used in budget cars?
Och is offline  
Old 10-13-13, 10:11 PM
  #62  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,841
Received 110 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Och
Well, nobody is buying a hybrid camry for performance.

A four cylinder Camry is just simply a smarter buy for vast majority of shoppers, and if you don't believe me - check the cash register.

In a performance car, I'd take turbos over hybrid any time. Way too many drawbacks with hybrids, and for the most part performance is lacking compared to turbo engines with similar displacement.
i dont understand what is that supposed to mean at all. People dont like 7s 0-60 vs 8.2? People dont like 10 MPG more? Better resale?

1.6l Turbo in Fusion is slower, gets 10 worse and costs more than non turbo. So whats the point?
spwolf is online now  
Old 10-13-13, 10:17 PM
  #63  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
i dont understand what is that supposed to mean at all. People dont like 7s 0-60 vs 8.2? People dont like 10 MPG more? Better resale?
Just do the math and check the cash register. Most of hybrid Camry's I see here in NYC are fleet vehicles, used for car service and taxi duties - in which case the price premium might be justified by fuel saving. Otherwise they aren't selling much.

Originally Posted by spwolf
1.6l Turbo in Fusion is slower, gets 10 worse and costs more than non turbo. So whats the point?
Exactly my point, turbo engines in budget cars are stupid.
Och is offline  
Old 10-14-13, 03:36 AM
  #64  
SteVTEC
Lexus Test Driver
 
SteVTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
In fact, here is the shocker - MotorTrend tested Mazda6 vs Camry 2.5l, and Camry got better mpg. So much for that eh?
Not really, just your usual and expected cherry-picking of stats.

Consumer Reports:

City / Highway / Overall

Mazda6: 22 / 44 / 32 mpg
Camry: 19 / 41 / 27 mpg
Accord: 21 / 40 / 30 mpg
Altima: 21 / 44 / 31 mpg

That's Consumer Reports own independent and controlled city and highway fuel mileage tests. The 6 is best in class, which is not surprising considering it has one of the most advanced engines. The Camry brings up the rear.
SteVTEC is offline  
Old 10-14-13, 03:44 AM
  #65  
SteVTEC
Lexus Test Driver
 
SteVTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Och
Just do the math and check the cash register. Most of hybrid Camry's I see here in NYC are fleet vehicles, used for car service and taxi duties - in which case the price premium might be justified by fuel saving. Otherwise they aren't selling much.
They're not selling here either. In fact I just checked our local no-haggle Toyota dealership's pricing and the Camry Hybrids are indeed selling at or below invoice, which is unheard of vs the last-gen model. Tons of them sitting on the lots. Wow. Know what's selling like mad here? The new Honda Accord. Much nicer design imho also.

When hybrids were new and petrol powered cars were only getting low-20 MPG overall and 30-ish mpg highway, stepping up to a hybrid was a huge difference. But being able to get 30 mpg overall now and 40 mpg highway with no price premium at all with the latest gen of cars, many people are thinking twice about hybrids and if they're really worth it or not, and plenty are opting out, even those who have bought them before.
SteVTEC is offline  
Old 10-14-13, 04:11 AM
  #66  
natnut
Pole Position
 
natnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,602
Received 87 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Are you sure the Accord is stealing Camry sales because of the hybrid or because the Accord is overall a compelling package? Talk about cherry picking facts.

I think many people are arguing against hybrids when "hybrid" is not ONE monilithic class.

Fact of the matter is, there are at least TWO different classes of hybrids :



Performance hybrids like the Porsche, Ferrari and even the Lexus GS450h and Infiniti M35h.

Then there are the Efficiency hybrids like the CT200h, the ES300h, the GS300h and IS300h...

As a luxury "efficiency" argument, hybrids are already pretty compelling as they are already close to beating turbodiesels for real world fuel efficiency with a refinement and quietness that diesels still can't beat. AND with none of the carcinogenic particulate emissions that diesels are infamous for.

As Performance Luxury vehicles, it's just a matter of maturation of the market and the tech. Right now Porsche and Ferrari have shown that hybrid can be a very credible performance package. For a price premium.

Lexus GS450h and Infiniti M35h are straddling the efficiency/performance continuum but with more tech trickling down from Toyota's research into the TS030 hyperperformance hybrid race car,it will only a matter of time that Lexus bring hyper performance hybrids into the mainstream luxury segment and at mainstream luxury costs.

Last edited by natnut; 10-14-13 at 04:33 AM.
natnut is offline  
Old 10-14-13, 05:51 AM
  #67  
SteVTEC
Lexus Test Driver
 
SteVTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by natnut
Are you sure the Accord is stealing Camry sales because of the hybrid or because the Accord is overall a compelling package? Talk about cherry picking facts
Where in my post was I talking about a hybrid anything?

Bottom line is that even the base Camry, which brings up the rear in its class as far as overall efficiency, is still good enough to steer people away from hybrids. I have no doubt that the Accord Hybrid will be an awesome car, but with a starting price of $39k it's not going to be stealing sales away from anybody. You could nearly buy TWO regular Honda Accords for the price of one Hybrid. At $40k, most people around here would rather be driving an entry luxury car from either Japan or German.
SteVTEC is offline  
Old 10-14-13, 07:22 AM
  #68  
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 78 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Accord LX starts at $22K. Accord Hybrid starts at $29K. $40K would be the plug-in model, which I think is overpriced anyways.
GSteg is offline  
Old 10-14-13, 07:29 AM
  #69  
Infra
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Infra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm waiting for air hybrids with pneumatic valve systems. They should result in much simpler drivetrains by eliminating the need for combining power from two sources, and will reduce parasitic loss on the motor by eliminating the camshaft.

Air is compressed in situations similar to how regenerative braking is used now, and pumped through the engine to accelerate.

Pneumatic valves allow complete control over valve lift height and duration which should improve power and emissions.
Infra is offline  
Old 10-14-13, 11:06 AM
  #70  
SteVTEC
Lexus Test Driver
 
SteVTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol I'm waiting for HCCI.
SteVTEC is offline  
Old 10-14-13, 11:55 AM
  #71  
RocketGuy3
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
RocketGuy3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 1,564
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Does this mean the powertrain in the upper end IS will finally be updated? 306-hp is starting to look a little weaksauce these days...
RocketGuy3 is offline  
Old 10-14-13, 12:23 PM
  #72  
Blackraven
Lexus Champion
 
Blackraven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Makati, Philippines
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
you would pay more to get half the mpg? :-)
Personally, when it comes to automobiles, I don't give a rat's *** about fuel economy

Otherwise, if I did, then I should just be taking public transportation instead.

Just saying
Blackraven is offline  
Old 10-14-13, 12:36 PM
  #73  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Just by nature of volume you will have Camry's and Accords on dealer lots. The fact of the matter is people trust the Camry hybrid and its accurate MPG ratings compared to FLUFFERY by other brands. Hyundai again just lowered the 2014 Sonata ratings.

Not everyone gives a **** about peak hp ratings or peak MPG based on unicorn math. Some people trust what is proven.

Getting to engines, Lexus used to be at the lead to me with BMW with engines but that is no longer the case. While perfectly adequate they are not class leading except in maybe reliability. I can't wait to see the new powerplants and what they offer. They cannot go another 5 years to me with the same engines.
 
Old 10-14-13, 12:39 PM
  #74  
84Cressida
Lead Lap
 
84Cressida's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SteVTEC
Not really, just your usual and expected cherry-picking of stats.

Consumer Reports:

City / Highway / Overall

Mazda6: 22 / 44 / 32 mpg
Camry: 19 / 41 / 27 mpg
Accord: 21 / 40 / 30 mpg
Altima: 21 / 44 / 31 mpg

That's Consumer Reports own independent and controlled city and highway fuel mileage tests. The 6 is best in class, which is not surprising considering it has one of the most advanced engines. The Camry brings up the rear.
Wait. He's cherry picking from using MT's numbers, but you aren't because you're using CR?
84Cressida is offline  
Old 10-14-13, 01:02 PM
  #75  
SteVTEC
Lexus Test Driver
 
SteVTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 84Cressida
Wait. He's cherry picking from using MT's numbers, but you aren't because you're using CR?
How do people know that Ford's EcoBoost engines and SOME other turbo-petrol engines haven't lived up to mileage claims, hmm? Look into that and you'll have your answer there. (Hint: It's not by looking up MT data).
SteVTEC is offline  


Quick Reply: Toyota to OverHaul Engines



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:20 AM.