Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

GM: Still $42 BILLION in the hole

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-26-12, 12:59 PM
  #1  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,760
Received 2,126 Likes on 1,378 Posts
Default GM: Still $42 BILLION in the hole

so much for the touted success story of GM's bailout...


so even if it 'saved' 500,000 jobs, that's $84,000 a job!


Despite President Barack Obama’s stories about a resurgent GM ready to repay its bailout tab, the automaker and its former bank still owe taxpayers nearly $42 billion, according to an inspector general’s report.
GM owes $27 billion on the nearly $50 billion it received from the auto bailout and Ally Bank, the company’s lending arm, owes $14.7 billion of the $17.2 billion taxpayer-funded bailout it received.
Obama has promoted the auto bailout as a success story, highlighting the manufacturing jobs it may have saved in swing states such as Ohio and Michigan.
“I refused to turn my back on a great industry and American workers. I bet on American workers. I bet on American manufacturing,” he said at a campaign rally in Oakland. “Three years later, the American auto industry has come roaring back.”
GM’s stock has plummeted in recent months after stagnant development in overseas markets. It hit a new low on Wednesday, falling to $18.80, a 52 percent drop from its January 2011 high of $38.90.
The rapid decline of the stock price has kept taxpayers on the hook for billions in unpaid bailout dollars. The stock would need to make a quick—and meteoric—turnaround for taxpayers to break even.
“In order to recoup its total investment in GM, Treasury will need to recover an additional $27 billion in proceeds. This translates to an average of $53.98 per share on its remaining common shares in New GM,” the IG report concluded.
The federal government has maintained a 32 percent ownership interest in GM, despite promises to sell off its shares after the November 2010 IPO. The administration has also maintained a controlling interest in Ally Financial, formerly known as GMAC.
The administration lost $2.9 billion on the Chrysler bailout, a black eye to Obama’s initial promise that all taxpayer dollars would be recovered. Selling shares in GM and Ally would lead to a multi-billion dollar loss for taxpayers and could damage the Obama campaign’s claim in a March campaign video that the ailing automaker had repaid its loans.
“Because of the tough choices the president made, the stage was set for a resurgent U.S. auto industry,” Tom Hanks said, narrating the 17-minute campaign video titled The Road We’ve Traveled. “With business booming, (GM and Chrysler) repaid their loans.”
Financial experts see the election-year creeping into the decision to hold on to the falling stock.
“Geithner and the rest of Treasury doesn’t want to admit that it is a mess and they’ve been lying to us for three years,” Christopher Whalen, cofounder of Institutional Risk Analytics, told the Washington Free Beaconin April. “They’re waiting until after the election.”

http://freebeacon.com/gm-still-42b-in-the-hole/
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 01:18 PM
  #2  
SaintNexus
Lexus Champion
 
SaintNexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

..just file for bankruptcy already.
SaintNexus is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 02:06 PM
  #3  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,670
Received 184 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

it's been a joke since day 1, so it's not funny anymore
rominl is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 02:36 PM
  #4  
GS3Tek
Moderator
iTrader: (8)
 
GS3Tek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: so cal
Posts: 12,358
Received 162 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Sooooooo, anyone else out there think we should keep dumping money into this?

I guess they are living up to their slogan: Chevy runs deep into the ground
GS3Tek is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 02:41 PM
  #5  
Stormwind
Racer
 
Stormwind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yup not a suprise at all. If obama thinks gm stock can go higher than what it is currently then he is in for some more pain, it's not going anywhere but down for the next four years, it might go up some if the next guy decides to bail gm out again but the next four years is the only thing Obama cares about. He is better off selling the stock now than risk taking another hair cut when the stock pummels again in the future.

Oh believe me gm is trying hard working their bean counters overtime to hide the losses every quarter as we speak but they can only sweep it under the rug for so long until things start to puff out.

All signs point to a bleak future for gm as I have done a research on this stock a while back and found some gloomy things to come.

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/car...f-trouble.html
Stormwind is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 04:48 PM
  #6  
gengar
Moderator: LFA, Clubhouse

 
gengar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NV
Posts: 5,287
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Everything that is wrong about democracy is right in those first couple sentences. Politicians fleece the American taxpayers of billions of dollars so they can hit the campaign trail talking about all the jobs they "saved".

GM's market cap is barely over the 27 billion outstanding in loans. This is your taxpayer dollars at work.
gengar is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 04:56 PM
  #7  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,841
Received 110 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

well GM is still profitable... but problem with GM is that they have not really changed... in fact, nothing has really changed except Chrysler which is under Fiat now. But Fiat is a lot like old Chrysler, just Italian.

But can we honestly say that we see some really big changes in Automotive industry since 2008? I dont think so.
A lot of it is really just an PR. That includes Toyota/Lexus/GM/Ford/VW/BMW/MB, etc, etc.

We all are suckers for PR.
spwolf is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 05:35 PM
  #8  
LeX2K
Lexus Champion
 
LeX2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 19,415
Received 2,706 Likes on 2,291 Posts
Default

This is why you have to let the free market decide. Sure, you can delay the inevitable by tossing public money at GM, but eventually they are going to have to pay the piper. Nothing has changed at General Motors, same lack luster products, average quality, stupid management, lack of a long term plan. All the things that made GM go bankrupt in the first place.

But don't worry the Chevy Volt will save the company, right?
LeX2K is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 06:24 PM
  #9  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GS3Tek
Sooooooo, anyone else out there think we should keep dumping money into this?

I guess they are living up to their slogan: Chevy runs deep into the ground
I lol'd
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 06:58 PM
  #10  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,574
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

I have to disagree with some of these posts.....and I've been watching GM for decades.
A lot has changed at GM. Several of you guys are overlooking the fact that the last few years (finally) have truly produced some excellent new GM products...Malibu, Sonic, Cruze, Silverado, CTS, and, of course, my favorite (Verano). All of these vehicles are vastly better, in many ways, than either the GM vehicles they replaced or those that were were in the market before them. Yes, better GM products were long overdue. Yes, the company has promised better products many times in the past...and then crapped out. Well, guess what? This time (and I've been watching them for 40 years), they're not crapping out.....they're delivering.

So...why are they delivering this time when they promised several times, in the past they would, and didn't? I think that, like Chrysler (who, BTW, is also delivering now, after repeated faliures in the past) it was them suffering the public humiliation of being once the world's largest automaker, losing the crown to Toyota (and possibly to VW), and then actually going bankrupt, after years of barely staying afloat. Bankrupcy, unlike past experiences, produced a real positive change at GM, something that, IMO, had eluded them for decades.

Last edited by mmarshall; 07-26-12 at 07:03 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 07:06 PM
  #11  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,033
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

and yet ford is doing the same thing but better without a bailout
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 07:18 PM
  #12  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,574
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lexus2000
Nothing has changed at General Motors, same lack luster products, average quality, stupid management, lack of a long term plan. All the things that made GM go bankrupt in the first place.
No, I disagree....see my post just above. What you are describing, with very few exceptions, is pretty much in the past.....although see my comments on the Volt, below.

But don't worry the Chevy Volt will save the company, right?
No. In fact, IMO, the Volt was a mistake.....it's overpriced, just like some other pure-electrics and plug-in hybrids. That was one of the company's rare screw-ups lately.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 07:24 PM
  #13  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,574
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
and yet ford is doing the same thing but better without a bailout
No. Ford is indeed doing a good job in some areas, but, with a couple of exceptions, in the last couple of years, I've been more impressed with what I've seen from GM and Chrysler. Ford also messed up, IMO, with the MyTouch/SYNC systems, some of their new interiors, and with the Focus and Fiesta's twin-clutch automanuals.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 08:01 PM
  #14  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,841
Received 110 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
and yet ford is doing the same thing but better without a bailout
is ford really doing better? they will have massive drop in profits this year.
spwolf is offline  
Old 07-26-12, 08:26 PM
  #15  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
No. Ford is indeed doing a good job in some areas, but, with a couple of exceptions, in the last couple of years, I've been more impressed with what I've seen from GM and Chrysler. Ford also messed up, IMO, with the MyTouch/SYNC systems, some of their new interiors, and with the Focus and Fiesta's twin-clutch automanuals.
GM and Chrysler do not have these hiccups that Ford has because they have not brought out new, innovative product like Ford has. GM and Chrysler have been IMPROVING their product (especially the interiors in the current Chrysler models) but they have not introduced the new innovative products (with the exception of the Volt) like Ford has.

And whenever you introduce something truly new, you will have some teething pains. That is what Ford is going through right now.

Where is GM's or Chrysler's Touch/SYNC? Where is GM's or Chrysler's twin-clutch DSG transmission? Where is GM's or Chrysler's Active Park Assist automatic parallel parking? Where are GM's hybrid models -- what happened to the Dual Mode Hybrid that is in its trucks and was supposed to trickle down into the Saturn Vue Hybrid? Instead, we get this (very) mild hybrid in the Malibu and LaCrosse.

I expect to see some of these new technologies from Chrysler sooner rather than later as Fiat technology trickles down, but when can we expect to see some of this from GM?

Ford may be having some hiccups -- and paying the price as shown in JD Power surveys -- but it is aggressively bringing out new, imaginative, innovative technology and I have no doubt that the technology teething problems will be ironed out soon.
Sulu is offline  


Quick Reply: GM: Still $42 BILLION in the hole



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:00 PM.