GM: Still $42 BILLION in the hole
#16
So...why are they delivering this time when they promised several times, in the past they would, and didn't? I think that, like Chrysler (who, BTW, is also delivering now, after repeated faliures in the past) it was them suffering the public humiliation of being once the world's largest automaker, losing the crown to Toyota (and possibly to VW), and then actually going bankrupt, after years of barely staying afloat. Bankrupcy, unlike past experiences, produced a real positive change at GM, something that, IMO, had eluded them for decades.
Whenever gm executives tried to give themselves a big bonus (oh they tried, quite a few times) or use company paid vacations to some exotic locations Obama would tighten the reigns crack a few lashes on the backs of executives and told them to go back to work. I believe Obama has been the main driving force behind why gm is putting out non-lame products.
#17
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
I believe the reason gm got off their asses and start doing some real work is not because of pubic humilation, they been humilated over and over for decades and they still haven't learnt, not because of pride as they have none. Workers have been caught drinking during lunch breaks over and over. The reason is because of Obama. Unlike past bail outs where the government just gave them a pile of cash and told them chip chip cheerios off you go, Obama has kept a tight reign on them and rode them close.
Whenever gm executives tried to give themselves a big bonus (oh they tried, quite a few times) or use company paid vacations to some exotic locations Obama would tighten the reigns crack a few lashes on the backs of executives and told them to go back to work.
regardless, gm, while designing and making some really great products, is still in big trouble. i just read an article showing toyota will outsell them this year, which is remarkable given how toyota has had to overcome to tsunami/earthquake, and launch products and be stuck with a pretty aged product line.
gm should have been allowed to go through a normal corporate bankruptcy, and should have moved its corporate offices out of detroit, and then moved their factories out of michigan over time too.
gm shrunk in the obama bailout, and is making some good vehicles, but in many ways it hasn't changed its ways, which is why it's likely doomed to fail again.
#18
Lexus Champion
It's been a little over 3 years since GM filed chapter 11. In 3 years you can make improvements, but you can't substantially change the DNA of your vehicles. For that reason I don't believe General Motors has changed all that much, plus the new cars I've seen from them gave me that same lackluster, ho hum vibe. Moving in the right direction? Probably, but the competition is not standing still either.
#19
They've improved, but I feel Ford has had a better, more impressive turnaround, and their cars are better than the equivalent Chevy, IMHO. GM is also still run by imbesiles. Dan Akerson is a flat out moron and nothing compared to Alan Mulally.
#20
It's still the same old BS at GM. They just keep talking about how good they are and will be, just like they have been for the past 30 years. It hasn't ever been true and it never will be true. The company is beyond repair. The government is just making it worse by endorsing this kind of failure. It's sad to see that a few union votes are worth this kind of taxpayer loss to Obama.
#21
Moderator
Everything that is wrong about democracy is right in those first couple sentences. Politicians fleece the American taxpayers of billions of dollars so they can hit the campaign trail talking about all the jobs they "saved".
GM's market cap is barely over the 27 billion outstanding in loans. This is your taxpayer dollars at work.
GM's market cap is barely over the 27 billion outstanding in loans. This is your taxpayer dollars at work.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=gm&ql=1
#22
<gag>
so this is the proper role of a president? to micromanage an auto maker? a guy who never ran anything, never ran a business, never made money except in a crooked real estate deal, then becoming a politician, then writing a successful book?
regardless, gm, while designing and making some really great products, is still in big trouble. i just read an article showing toyota will outsell them this year, which is remarkable given how toyota has had to overcome to tsunami/earthquake, and launch products and be stuck with a pretty aged product line.
gm should have been allowed to go through a normal corporate bankruptcy, and should have moved its corporate offices out of detroit, and then moved their factories out of michigan over time too.
gm shrunk in the obama bailout, and is making some good vehicles, but in many ways it hasn't changed its ways, which is why it's likely doomed to fail again.
so this is the proper role of a president? to micromanage an auto maker? a guy who never ran anything, never ran a business, never made money except in a crooked real estate deal, then becoming a politician, then writing a successful book?
regardless, gm, while designing and making some really great products, is still in big trouble. i just read an article showing toyota will outsell them this year, which is remarkable given how toyota has had to overcome to tsunami/earthquake, and launch products and be stuck with a pretty aged product line.
gm should have been allowed to go through a normal corporate bankruptcy, and should have moved its corporate offices out of detroit, and then moved their factories out of michigan over time too.
gm shrunk in the obama bailout, and is making some good vehicles, but in many ways it hasn't changed its ways, which is why it's likely doomed to fail again.
Could Obama done a better job? I am sure he could but at least he is out there getting things done. I do agree with you that gm should be left alone and let darwin take over.
#23
Lexus Fanatic
I am surprised to hear this. They made such a big deal about repaying the loans so fast. They should let GM go down the tubes where it really already is apparently
#26
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
i believe they made payments on SOME of the short term loans, even some ahead of time, and of course they made big hay of that. but that was nickels and dimes compared to what they still owe.
#27
Moderator: LFA, Clubhouse
The statement from the GM CEO about repaying loans was simply a huge PR stunt. There is no factual or logical basis to say GM paid back any "loan", much less a "in full". Of course they made a big deal about it, because politicians and especially the White House needed it in the face of increasing public scrutiny about the bailouts. That is all politicians are nowadays: Big sound bites that are utter lies, designed to fool the American people.
#28
<gag>
so this is the proper role of a president? to micromanage an auto maker? a guy who never ran anything, never ran a business, never made money except in a crooked real estate deal, then becoming a politician, then writing a successful book?
regardless, gm, while designing and making some really great products, is still in big trouble. i just read an article showing toyota will outsell them this year, which is remarkable given how toyota has had to overcome to tsunami/earthquake, and launch products and be stuck with a pretty aged product line.
gm should have been allowed to go through a normal corporate bankruptcy, and should have moved its corporate offices out of detroit, and then moved their factories out of michigan over time too.
gm shrunk in the obama bailout, and is making some good vehicles, but in many ways it hasn't changed its ways, which is why it's likely doomed to fail again.
so this is the proper role of a president? to micromanage an auto maker? a guy who never ran anything, never ran a business, never made money except in a crooked real estate deal, then becoming a politician, then writing a successful book?
regardless, gm, while designing and making some really great products, is still in big trouble. i just read an article showing toyota will outsell them this year, which is remarkable given how toyota has had to overcome to tsunami/earthquake, and launch products and be stuck with a pretty aged product line.
gm should have been allowed to go through a normal corporate bankruptcy, and should have moved its corporate offices out of detroit, and then moved their factories out of michigan over time too.
gm shrunk in the obama bailout, and is making some good vehicles, but in many ways it hasn't changed its ways, which is why it's likely doomed to fail again.
a good salesman not maketh a good sales manager.
#29
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Taxpayers funding a Chevy Volt Village:
http://www.insideline.com/chevrolet/...community.html
Govt Motors spending $600M to sponsor European Soccer teams:
http://freebeacon.com/government-mot...-soccer-promo/
I guess if you are this deep into a hole you might as well go out with a bang. Now they are trying to increase sales to subprime borrowers to pad short term sales figures. This was one of the reasons they went bankrupt in the first place.
http://www.insideline.com/chevrolet/...community.html
Govt Motors spending $600M to sponsor European Soccer teams:
http://freebeacon.com/government-mot...-soccer-promo/
I guess if you are this deep into a hole you might as well go out with a bang. Now they are trying to increase sales to subprime borrowers to pad short term sales figures. This was one of the reasons they went bankrupt in the first place.