Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

The worst-selling cars of 2011

Old 10-10-11, 12:26 AM
  #1  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post The worst-selling cars of 2011

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44720971/displaymode/1247/?beginSlide=1#.To_l1hX77L0<br>

I lol'd

2011 sales flops
By Dan Carney
Auto industry sales are recovering fitfully, but there have been some bonafide home runs, as cars like the Chevrolet Cruze and Hyundai Elantra sell almost as quickly as they arrive at dealerships.

Other models’ fortunes have gone from bad to worse. We’ve compiled a list of 10 of the worst offenders, looking at models that have sold in low triple-digit numbers each month so far this year.

These aren’t the only ones that sell in such low volumes, but many of the cars that sell in small numbers can claim exclusivity and price as the reason rather than unpopularity. Some other weak sellers, such as Cadillac's STS and Mazda’s RX-8, have already been discontinued by their makers and are limping to the exit, so we’ve excused them from this list.

The hideous and slow-selling BMW 550GT escapes inclusion because the company doesn’t break out its handful of sales from those of the rest of the 5-series line, so only the bean counters in Munich know just how poorly that car is selling.

The cars included here are unmitigated market failures -- cars that should probably cost someone their job because they cost too much to design, certify to the government and market for them to sell in such embarrassing numbers.


Acura RL
The Acura RL sells in a segment that could let it rightfully claim exclusivity if it didn’t sell in such absurdly low numbers. At 43 units in September, the RL is one of the worst-selling cars on our list. Why is this?

Let us count the ways: Acura design is lost, with each new model seemingly more determined than the last to drive the final remaining customers from the showroom. The brand has no cachet because most of its models are warmed-over Hondas. And in the case of the RL, Acura is attempting to compete in the prestige segment with a model whose specifications are pedestrian.

Luxury sedan customers have expected V-8 power and rear-wheel drive, and Acura has delivered a V-6 and economy car front drive or front-drive-derived all-wheel-drive. So there we have it: ugly, slow and unprestigious. It is a wonder they managed to sell 43 of them.

Year-to-date sales: 979 (down 34 percent from 2010)


Acura TSX wagon
Acura’s problems are so extensive that the brand holds down multiple spots on this list. Here is the TSX wagon, which sold a paltry 265 units last month. The shame is that it is a pretty nice car, apart from the corporate ugliness that was grafted on in its last facelift.

But Americans continue to resist the charms of sporty small wagons not named Volkswagen Jetta, and Acura hasn’t been able change that. Acura planned to sell a diesel version of the TSX, and considering that more than 80 percent of Jetta Sportwagens are diesels, maybe rescinding that decision was the mistake that has undermined the TSX Wagon. But VW sold more Jetta Sportwagens with a gas engine than Acura sold TSX Wagons, so Acura is falling short even on that comparison.

Year-to-date sales: 2,432 (not sold in 2010)
Advertise | AdChoices


Acura ZDX
The Acura ZDX is the poster child for job-losing mistakes. This is a car that launched with a Super Bowl television commercial but whose sales appear to be primarily to dealerships themselves, where they serve as loaner cars for the service department.

Yes, it is as ugly as the Pontiac Aztek. But the Aztek sold in orders of magnitude higher volume. So far this year Acura has sold fewer than 1,200 ZDXs, while the Aztek sold 27,000 a year for each of its first three years.

The Pontiac was reasonably priced, while the ZDX carries a premium price tag, saddling it with the same handicaps as the RL. Only more so.

Year-to-date sales: 1,220 (down 54 percent from 2010)



Of course this looks like “kick Honda when they are down” day, but really, blunders of this magnitude are inexcusable. In a market where the top-selling models are pickup trucks, Honda managed to push only 214 Ridgeline pickups off its dealers’ lots in August. More F-150s fell off delivery trucks that month.

Why? Truck buyers expect trucks that work. The Ridgeline has a small payload capacity and small towing capacity, so it doesn’t. That means it gets good gas mileage then, right? Wrong. The Ridgeline’s EPA numbers are no better than those of the big domestic trucks. Ask it to tow or haul and the Honda’s mileage plummets to 12 mpg.

And its styling? Are you kidding?


Year-to-date sales: 6,476 (down 49 percent from 2010)
Advertise | AdChoices



Honda Civic Hybrid
The Civic Hybrid is another victim of Honda’s malaise. The Civic isn’t a bad car, but it is no longer a great one, and the hybrid just costs too much to justify its price premium over its thrifty stablemates. The Hybrid costs $4,000 more than the HF model, with a difference in fuel economy of 44 mpg in combined driving for the hybrid and 33 mpg for the HF.

Shoppers recognize that 33 mpg is pretty darn good and keep that four grand in their pocket. The base car costs about $8,000 less and averages 31 mpg. And those alarmist news stories say Americans are bad at math. Honda wishes they were so they could sell more Civic Hybrids.

Year-to-date sales: 3,155 (down 39 percent from 2010)


Hyundai can do no wrong, right? After all, the company is on a roll, with the Elantra and Sonata shaming hotcakes, so rapidly do they sell. And the sporty Genesis Coupe has established some genuine sporting credentials for a company not known for fun-to-drive cars, while the Equus prestige sedan is conveying esteem to the brand with sales that embarrass the Acura RL.
The troubles here are the usual suspects; t
he car is so conservatively non-descript that it borders on ugly.
It is Hyundai’s oldest model, from a time before it developed all of its current winners, so its driving dynamics, fuel efficiency and overall execution harken back to Hyundai’s up-and-coming years rather than its current riding-high epoch.

The company realizes all of this and has a new one ready to debut at the LA Auto Show. Rest assured -- it won’t find a place on this list in the future.

Year-to-date sales: 1,407 (down 42 percent from 2010)
Advertise | AdChoices


Lincoln is in much the same boat as Acura. The MKT is ugly, it is expensive and the brand’s little remaining cachet drained away when the NBA traded its Navigators for Escalades a decade ago.

This is a big, expensive family-hauling crossover that is too expensive for families and too ugly and too undistinguished for the country club set. There is surely a niche for premium three-row crossover SUVs, but the execution needs to be more like the Audi Q7 and less like the Dali-esque MKT, which appears to have melted lumpily in the sun.

Year-to-date sales: 3,757 (down 34 percent from 2010)
Advertise | AdChoices



Well, it seemed like Lincoln’s weak brand image is the MKT’s problem, but even a blue-chip brand like Mercedes is unable to conjure customers for the R-Class. This is a vehicle that shares the MKT’s other failings: It costs too much for suburban families to serve as a minivan substitute and its minivan-esque profile marks it as a family hauler for regular Mercedes buyers. That leaves it in a no-mans land with double-digit monthly sales. In August they actually sold only 30 of them. Maybe that means it will be a rare collector’s item in the future.

Or not.

Year-to-date sales: 1,986 (down 10 percent from 2010)
Advertise | AdChoices


Subaru Tribeca
Gosh, it’s hard to be sure what happened here exactly because there are so many confounding factors. The Tribeca, a three-row, seven-seat crossover SUV, launched with an awkward name, B-5 Tribeca, and even more awkward styling. The combination probably limited the vehicle’s opportunity to convince consumers that Subaru makes more than just jaunty little wagons suitable for weekend trips to the country.

Subaru shortened the name and tidied up the styling, but there were other issues too. Gas mileage is poor, even for the segment. Subarus are pricy, and as the pinnacle of the product line, the Tribeca is the priciest. Mainstream consumers may be reluctant to spend nearly 40 grand on a Subaru and the company’s go-to crunchy granola constituents not only don’t want a big SUV, they probably wish Subaru didn’t sell one. With sales like this, they will likely get their wish.

Year-to-date sales: 1,970 (down 4 percent from 2010)
Advertise | AdChoices




Here’s a surprise. The Land Cruiser has fans. Or it did, before it got soft and expensive. So even though people still like the Land Cruiser, they tend to choke on its price. Or if they can afford it, they shrug and head to the Lexus dealer where they buy its LX560 twin for only slightly more money. Twice as many shoppers chose the Lexus as the Toyota version, which dipped into double digits in July.

Year-to-date sales: 1,226 (down 4.5 percent from 2010)
 
Old 10-10-11, 12:40 AM
  #2  
blacksc400
Car Chat Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
blacksc400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas!
Posts: 10,143
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Suprised to see LC on the list, but it's ture, if I was buying one, I would pay more to get LX570.
blacksc400 is offline  
Old 10-10-11, 01:10 AM
  #3  
CK6Speed
Super Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
CK6Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: HI
Posts: 7,719
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Can't argue with that. Acura really needs to hire new designers. The cars looks gets me in the showroom. The rest of the package keeps me there and makes me a buyer. Acura and half of the Honda line up is just too ugly to even get me int he door, so the rest of the car really doesn't matter. I can't believe the 19 year old Acura in my garage was made by the same company putting out the cars they are today.
CK6Speed is offline  
Old 10-10-11, 08:56 AM
  #4  
Slash300zx
Instructor
 
Slash300zx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Fl
Posts: 770
Received 107 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Yeah it's no surprise the LC went down, I definitely would get the LX over the LC for such a little price difference. If the LC had a lower price I bet those sales numbers would change in a second
Slash300zx is offline  
Old 10-10-11, 08:59 AM
  #5  
dsnowgs4
Pole Position
 
dsnowgs4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow is Acura even going to be around in a few years?

I mean from the success of the Legend/Integra/NSX/TL to this sorry batch of cars...

Ouch..
dsnowgs4 is offline  
Old 10-10-11, 09:08 AM
  #6  
madmax2k1
Intermediate
 
madmax2k1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

wow, 50% of the cars on this list are either Honda or Acura; anxiously waiting for Acura's next stupid press release where they fail to logically explain the slow sales of the cars listed above, and their intention to move back to Tier 1.

Last edited by madmax2k1; 10-10-11 at 09:43 AM.
madmax2k1 is offline  
Old 10-10-11, 09:32 AM
  #7  
Koma
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
Koma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

That's not a Hyundai Equus. They're thinking of the Azera.
Koma is offline  
Old 10-10-11, 10:14 AM
  #8  
jadu
live.love.laugh.lexus

iTrader: (42)
 
jadu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CALI
Posts: 11,581
Received 88 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

2: Honda

what happened?

<3 jadu
jadu is offline  
Old 10-10-11, 10:15 AM
  #9  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,670
Received 183 Likes on 142 Posts
Default

lmao at least finally honda/acura won something

for the LC though, i thought the supply itself is already very low? but very true, if i get that car, i might as well wing another 10k and get the lx570. far more luxurious and just about as capable for most people. but at least both the LX and LC hold resale like crazy
rominl is offline  
Old 10-10-11, 10:16 AM
  #10  
PhantomZX
Lead Lap
 
PhantomZX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: California
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Koma
That's not a Hyundai Equus. They're thinking of the Azera.
The quote (and maybe article) left out the name of that Hyundai pictured. The quote was stating that the Equus is embarrassing the RL, not that the Equus is the poor selling Hyundai.
PhantomZX is offline  
Old 10-10-11, 10:20 AM
  #11  
speed6
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
speed6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cali
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

5 are from HMC?
lol
speed6 is offline  
Old 10-10-11, 10:24 AM
  #12  
Koma
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
Koma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by PhantomZX
The quote (and maybe article) left out the name of that Hyundai pictured. The quote was stating that the Equus is embarrassing the RL, not that the Equus is the poor selling Hyundai.
Good catch, I didn't read the article correctly.
Koma is offline  
Old 10-10-11, 10:27 AM
  #13  
ABC
Racer

 
ABC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,720
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

"Of course this looks like “kick Honda when they are down” day" lol so true. Poor honda
ABC is offline  
Old 10-10-11, 11:00 AM
  #14  
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 78 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

The most disappointing car on the list has got to be the TSX. We waited YEARS to get a hatchback from Acura and when we do get one, it's half-assed. At least throw in the V6 with SH-AWD that they already have. I would have chosen that over the Audi A4 Avant.

Last edited by GSteg; 10-10-11 at 10:02 PM.
GSteg is offline  
Old 10-10-11, 11:28 AM
  #15  
RXSF
Moderator
 
RXSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,041
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

I think the refreshed R Class looks pretty good. They did a good job with the front end. Too bad its too expensive
RXSF is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: The worst-selling cars of 2011



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:39 PM.