Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

First Drive: 2012 Hyundai Genesis 5.0 R-Spec

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-11, 02:25 PM
  #46  
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
LexBob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 10,987
Received 137 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

One of the area Hyundai dealers is running an ad titled "Premium Hyundai's".

It's a well done full page, full color ad showing Equus, Genesis and Veracruz (is this is going to be considered a Genesis?) and a bunch of their features.

I wonder if this is a plan Hyundai wants their dealers to adopt or just one dealer getting creative?
LexBob2 is online now  
Old 06-26-11, 05:32 PM
  #47  
Justin2JZ
Lexus Champion
 
Justin2JZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
is it only me or are those tips angled differently?
This was just a mule. (Not the final product)
Justin2JZ is offline  
Old 06-28-11, 04:13 PM
  #48  
RltyCheck
Driver School Candidate
 
RltyCheck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MD
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by meowCat
Nope. Whoever reviewed this vehicle is the newb, meaning not a true professional. 0-60 doesn't mean jack as the gearing affects critically in all range of speeds, meaning 0-to-150+ mph. Where the V8 (4.6 & 5.0) Genesis shines is in the mid and top end! not the ghey **** 0-60 accelerations that sissies like. I want a car that has very good pull from 120~ 155 mph, not interested in 0-60's...



The reviewer is definitely the newb. You are expecting a Ferrari 456 Italia? What the hell?????? This is no Lamborghini Gallardo. It's not mean to run LOUD. It's made for LUXURY. Luxury cars run silent with smooth acceleration. Just for reference the V8 4.6 Genesis wipes the bathroom floor with Ford Taurus SHO from 80~ top speed. With tighter gearing the 5.0 R-spec has with increased HP and TQ the high speed accelertion will be very nasty fast. Look out IS-F owners....




.
1) IS-F owners have absolutely nothing to worry about. Using your absolutely meaningless benchmark of 80-something (let's use 130mph, although 130 on the street is just plain dangerous no matter what you're driving). Using C&D test data:
IS-F
0-80: 7.0
0-130: 17.6
Calculated 80-130: 10.6

Genesis 4.6
0-80: 9.8
0-130: 25.3
Calculated 80-130: 15.5

I don't see the 5.0 knocking nearly 5 seconds off the 4.6's time.

And the Genesis 4.6 is only .9 seconds quicker from 80 to 130 than an SHO - hardly "wiping the floor", especially since the SHO is AWD. Why does everyone insist on comparing the SHO to every car on the planet except those that are comparable in performance, features, and size? When the Genesis is available with AWD, it will be very comparable to the SHO. For now, it isn't since its missing a huge feature that is standard on the SHO.

I agree that 0-60 is a fairly meaningless measure of real world performance. I would submit that C&D's 5-60 test is far more indicative of a car's real world engine performance than 0-60 or 80-130 (seriously, where did that come from?). In every day driving, low-to-mid power shines. Mid-top has no place on the street and anyone who buys a Genesis as a track car is delusional.

Genesis 4.6: 6.3
SHO: 5.7
IS-F: 4.8
Genesis 5.0: TBD

I really like the Genesis, but it's an apples-to-oranges comparison to both the IS-F (a whole different performance league) and SHO (AWD).
RltyCheck is offline  
Old 06-28-11, 05:23 PM
  #49  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,841
Received 110 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

you dont get it - people want to like it because it is cheap... so if review says something bad, it is the reviewers fault, not cars :-)
spwolf is offline  
Old 06-28-11, 05:46 PM
  #50  
IS350jet
Pole Position
 
IS350jet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Coral Springs, Fl
Posts: 2,882
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RltyCheck
1) IS-F owners have absolutely nothing to worry about. Using your absolutely meaningless benchmark of 80-something (let's use 130mph, although 130 on the street is just plain dangerous no matter what you're driving). Using C&D test data:
IS-F
0-80: 7.0
0-130: 17.6
Calculated 80-130: 10.6

Genesis 4.6
0-80: 9.8
0-130: 25.3
Calculated 80-130: 15.5

I don't see the 5.0 knocking nearly 5 seconds off the 4.6's time.

And the Genesis 4.6 is only .9 seconds quicker from 80 to 130 than an SHO - hardly "wiping the floor", especially since the SHO is AWD. Why does everyone insist on comparing the SHO to every car on the planet except those that are comparable in performance, features, and size? When the Genesis is available with AWD, it will be very comparable to the SHO. For now, it isn't since its missing a huge feature that is standard on the SHO.

I agree that 0-60 is a fairly meaningless measure of real world performance. I would submit that C&D's 5-60 test is far more indicative of a car's real world engine performance than 0-60 or 80-130 (seriously, where did that come from?). In every day driving, low-to-mid power shines. Mid-top has no place on the street and anyone who buys a Genesis as a track car is delusional.

Genesis 4.6: 6.3
SHO: 5.7
IS-F: 4.8
Genesis 5.0: TBD

I really like the Genesis, but it's an apples-to-oranges comparison to both the IS-F (a whole different performance league) and SHO (AWD).
Don't know where you got your numbers from.. oh, wait, that's right, C&D. That's interesting because my copy of C&D says the Genesis 4.6 will cover 0-60 in 5.6 sec, while Motor trend got a 5.5 sec, as did Road and track. Yes, the new 5.0 will smoke the SHO without even breaking a sweat. No, A Genesis will never compete against an ISF, nor was it ever meant to. Of course the ISF will be faster 80-130 but I'm betting it will do better than most people think. Basically, if the 5.0 gets the jump, the ISF will have to fight for that reel. Hyundai claims 0-60 in 5.1, however, so far most mags are predicting a real world time of 4.8 and that *is* ISF territory. Obviously, the ISF is a superior sports sedan but we're talking about acceleration only. There’s no question, the Genesis 5.0 can be considered a "badass" sedan.
IS350jet is offline  
Old 06-28-11, 06:04 PM
  #51  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,841
Received 110 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IS350jet
Don't know where you got your numbers from.. oh, wait, that's right, C&D. That's interesting because my copy of C&D says the Genesis 4.6 will cover 0-60 in 5.6 sec, while Motor trend got a 5.5 sec, as did Road and track. Yes, the new 5.0 will smoke the SHO without even breaking a sweat. No, A Genesis will never compete against an ISF, nor was it ever meant to. Of course the ISF will be faster 80-130 but I'm betting it will do better than most people think. Basically, if the 5.0 gets the jump, the ISF will have to fight for that reel. Hyundai claims 0-60 in 5.1, however, so far most mags are predicting a real world time of 4.8 and that *is* ISF territory. Obviously, the ISF is a superior sports sedan but we're talking about acceleration only. There’s no question, the Genesis 5.0 can be considered a "badass" sedan.
Insideline got also for 4.6l:
0-60 mph (sec.) 5.9
0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.) 5.7
0-75 mph (sec.) 8.5
1/4-mile (sec. @ mph) 14.1 @ 101.1

while Taurus SOHO:
0-60 mph (sec.) 5.8
0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.) 5.5
0-75 mph (sec.) 8.7
1/4-mile (sec. @ mph) 14.2 @ 99.1

No wonder Autoblog mentioned new 3.8l V6 being better choice overall than 5.0R

Last edited by spwolf; 06-28-11 at 07:09 PM.
spwolf is offline  
Old 06-28-11, 06:40 PM
  #52  
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 78 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Wow that's disappointing if that's the best it can do. My old GS400 matches those numbers and it's has slightly less than 300hp.

Love the look of the car, but I wouldn't buy it myself if it's just going to be as slow as my car.
GSteg is offline  
Old 06-29-11, 09:56 AM
  #53  
Lexuslvr91
Lead Lap
 
Lexuslvr91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How's it going everyone I'm new to this site.

The Genesis V6 was clocked from 0-60 in 5.9 seconds as recorded by Motortrend: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...est/specs.html

Also the Genesis 4.6 was clocked from 0-60 in 5.3 seconds as recorded by Car and Driver: http://www.caranddriver.com/var/ezfl...f7ee8008de.pdf

I have no doubt the new 333 hp V6 and 8-speed auto will allow the Genesis V6 to go from 0-60 in around 5.5 seconds which would make it about as fast as the GS350, 535i and A6 3.0T.
Lexuslvr91 is offline  
Old 06-29-11, 10:01 AM
  #54  
Lexuslvr91
Lead Lap
 
Lexuslvr91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RltyCheck
1) IS-F owners have absolutely nothing to worry about. Using your absolutely meaningless benchmark of 80-something (let's use 130mph, although 130 on the street is just plain dangerous no matter what you're driving). Using C&D test data:
IS-F
0-80: 7.0
0-130: 17.6
Calculated 80-130: 10.6

Genesis 4.6
0-80: 9.8
0-130: 25.3
Calculated 80-130: 15.5

I don't see the 5.0 knocking nearly 5 seconds off the 4.6's time.

And the Genesis 4.6 is only .9 seconds quicker from 80 to 130 than an SHO - hardly "wiping the floor", especially since the SHO is AWD. Why does everyone insist on comparing the SHO to every car on the planet except those that are comparable in performance, features, and size? When the Genesis is available with AWD, it will be very comparable to the SHO. For now, it isn't since its missing a huge feature that is standard on the SHO.

I agree that 0-60 is a fairly meaningless measure of real world performance. I would submit that C&D's 5-60 test is far more indicative of a car's real world engine performance than 0-60 or 80-130 (seriously, where did that come from?). In every day driving, low-to-mid power shines. Mid-top has no place on the street and anyone who buys a Genesis as a track car is delusional.

Genesis 4.6: 6.3
SHO: 5.7
IS-F: 4.8
Genesis 5.0: TBD

I really like the Genesis, but it's an apples-to-oranges comparison to both the IS-F (a whole different performance league) and SHO (AWD).
The Genesis R-spec is a 4100 lb fullsize and the IS-F is a 3800 lb sub-compact. In other words they do not compete even if both have RWD, 5.0 V8s, 400+ hp and 8-speed automatics.
Lexuslvr91 is offline  
Old 06-29-11, 10:06 AM
  #55  
Lexuslvr91
Lead Lap
 
Lexuslvr91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SRTGS300
Nice car but Hyundai definitely swagger jacked Infiniti with those tail lights. It looks like a new Infiniti M in the back.


The Genesis's tail lights are a reflection of the original 2008 Genesis Sedan Concept:


Lexuslvr91 is offline  
Old 06-29-11, 10:45 AM
  #56  
IS350jet
Pole Position
 
IS350jet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Coral Springs, Fl
Posts: 2,882
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Lexuslvr91
The Genesis R-spec is a 4100 lb fullsize and the IS-F is a 3800 lb sub-compact. In other words they do not compete even if both have RWD, 5.0 V8s, 400+ hp and 8-speed automatics.
Hyundai Accents, Nissan Versa's, and Toyota Yaris's are subcompacts. ISF is a Mid-size.
IS350jet is offline  
Old 06-29-11, 11:15 AM
  #57  
Lexuslvr91
Lead Lap
 
Lexuslvr91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IS350jet
Hyundai Accents, Nissan Versa's, and Toyota Yaris's are subcompacts. ISF is a Mid-size.
As classified by the EPA the 2012 Accent is a compact, the Versa is a midsize and the Lexus IS in all iterations is a sub-compact. You can do a very quick search on google.com if you doubt me.
Lexuslvr91 is offline  
Old 06-29-11, 11:27 AM
  #58  
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 78 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Yea the definitions have changed over the year. Your full size cars back then are now practically subcompacts next to these newer cars.
GSteg is offline  
Old 06-29-11, 11:42 AM
  #59  
IS350jet
Pole Position
 
IS350jet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Coral Springs, Fl
Posts: 2,882
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Lexuslvr91
As classified by the EPA the 2012 Accent is a compact, the Versa is a midsize and the Lexus IS in all iterations is a sub-compact. You can do a very quick search on google.com if you doubt me.
Yea I did, and just as I stated, subcompact means "smaller than a compact".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subcompact_car
IS350jet is offline  
Old 06-29-11, 11:44 AM
  #60  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,841
Received 110 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lexuslvr91
How's it going everyone I'm new to this site.

The Genesis V6 was clocked from 0-60 in 5.9 seconds as recorded by Motortrend: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...est/specs.html

Also the Genesis 4.6 was clocked from 0-60 in 5.3 seconds as recorded by Car and Driver: http://www.caranddriver.com/var/ezfl...f7ee8008de.pdf

I have no doubt the new 333 hp V6 and 8-speed auto will allow the Genesis V6 to go from 0-60 in around 5.5 seconds which would make it about as fast as the GS350, 535i and A6 3.0T.
those two like to get bestest numbers around... i suggest you look at insideline data.
Of course, you can always show for the best result ever.
spwolf is offline  


Quick Reply: First Drive: 2012 Hyundai Genesis 5.0 R-Spec



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:31 PM.