Tough tough segment for Nissan to enter. Here's a list of some past 2-door models that did not make it: Nissan Pathfinder, Toyota 4-Runner, Suzuki Samari, Kia Sportage, Ford Explorer Sport, Ford Bronco and Bronco II, Land Rover Defender 90, Chevy Tahoe/GMC Yukon, Chevy S-10 Blazer/GMC S-15 Jimmy, Jeep Grand Cherokee, Isuzu VehiCross, Geo Tracker, et al.
I'm thinking Nissan could peddle this easier on the edgier and lower slung Juke and not the elongated and bulbous Murano.
This ad is not displayed to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on Club Lexus!
auto, air, tilt wheel, and more...
looks pretty good. I think it will sell decently, primarily due to American's (especially American women's) obsession with sitting up high in a tall vehicle a la SUVs. Looks better than the Z vert, lol, although I'd lower it about 3-4 inches...
It actually... looks good. It's a definite style statement for the ladies.
Big issues facing this... structural rigidity, how it looks top-up, actual utility which justifies getting it over a car convertible. Then again, it may have just enough raw appeal to overcome any deficiencies in those areas.
I don't think Nissan is consciously trying to open a new segment niche with this. I think it's more about extending as already popular model's range.
_______________________________ Building a fake futurein the hopes that the real future will show up and mate with it.
Just showed it to my assistant, who is a single mom in her early 40s.
She likes what she sees...
lol...If they were going to go with this world first maybe they should have let it debut with an Infiniti instead of a Nissan. For now Nissan seems to say its a luxury style vehicle and surely it will be 45-50k loaded. I could not believe Murano prices for the loaded models.
It's clear what Nissan is doing here. They already have a full lineup of products that "answers all the questions everyone asks". That is not the point of this vehicle. Obviously they are trying to create a new niche of products which separates them from Toyota, Honda, and the rest. There is nothing wrong with that. Clearly, they are not going to sell 20,000 of these per month. That is not the objective with this kind of product. But for those who have unusual taste and are looking for something a bit different, models like this and the Juke, Leaf, etc, answers the questions that THOSE buyers ask.
For a brand like Acura to offer a niche product like this (**cough cough ZDX cough cough**), it would be a joke (as they do not currently have a full product lineup). But why does Nissan or any full line automaker have to always play it safe and stick with the status quo of socially acceptable vehicles?
Just because Nissan can do something doesn't mean they should.
This is not exactly an aspirational car, or an ambitious niche they are trying to enter here.
Tell me, how did the PT Cruiser convertible do in the market?
Nissan already has the Juke anyways along with the Cube. I don't think Nissan wants to be known as "that weird" automaker with a lineup full of strange niche vehicles.
__________________ "A tradition cannot be founded if you reject the first generation" - Kazuo Okamoto, Chief Engineer 2nd generation LS 400.
A wise person recently told me, internet forums are mostly for whining.
The anonymity of the internet brings out the worst in everyone.
You are comparing an SUV with actual cargo capacity, a roof you can mount a rack onto, and the convenience of moving people since it has 4 doors to a 2 door, no cargo, no sport piece of metal with wheels.
hate to break it to you but I bet 99% of SUV owners never use the roof rack capability.
2013 Subaru WRX Limited, Navigation, HID, Leather, Sunroof, LED everything, Red vinyl tails
2010 Audi A5 2.0T Quattro, Sport Pkg w/19 inch, B&O, Bi-Xenon