Review: 2011 Lexus IS350AWD
#16
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
Thanks.
Yep...one of the better-looking Lexus models. It's a little on the small size, though, physically.....about the size, on the exterior, of a typical compact....and substantially smaller than its brother ES. That's not a whole lot of car (even with V6 and AWD) for 46K.
Yes....agreed. I griped enough about that in the review.....I won't re-hash that here.
Yes, the 250AWD is sluggish, by "enthusiast" standards. Lexus never did a 6MT version, which would have taken out some of the weight/drag and given it slightly better performance. But, perhaps (?) the Lexus marketers figured that, given the 250AWD's popularity with females, that a manual transmission probably wasn't needed....they tend to prefer automatics.
I myself would find the 250AWD perfectly acceptable as a daily-driver, myself (as I do with my 2.5L AWD Subaru), but its power level is clearly inadequate for a number of people.
The IS styling is 5 years old but still looks great both in and out.
AWD is a bit late but here. Better late than never.
I owned a '06 IS250 AWD which I loved but found to be way too slow.The extra power of the 3.5L and AWD is great that should have been available for years.
I myself would find the 250AWD perfectly acceptable as a daily-driver, myself (as I do with my 2.5L AWD Subaru), but its power level is clearly inadequate for a number of people.
#17
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Yes, the 250AWD is sluggish, by "enthusiast" standards. Lexus never did a 6MT version, which would have taken out some of the weight/drag and given it slightly better performance. But, perhaps (?) the Lexus marketers figured that, given the 250AWD's popularity with females, that a manual transmission probably wasn't needed....they tend to prefer automatics.
I myself would find the 250AWD perfectly acceptable as a daily-driver, myself (as I do with my 2.5L AWD Subaru), but its power level is clearly inadequate for a number of people.
I myself would find the 250AWD perfectly acceptable as a daily-driver, myself (as I do with my 2.5L AWD Subaru), but its power level is clearly inadequate for a number of people.
Lexus did have a manual version of the IS250 but not in AWD.
The AWD only really needed about 30 more HP to be quick enough,IMO.
#18
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
Thanks.
Yes, that issue has been pretty much covered with a number of posts.
Joeb427, above, seems to agree with you.
I didn't check every single 2011 color and package option off against the 2010 specs. But I believe that the F-Sport package can now be ordered without buying the actual IS-F model itself. The AWD for the 350, of course, is new....(the thread topic). There were some changes in how the NAV screen works (it now includes detours, construction, etc...). And a system similiar to the former Lexus-Link (and GM's On-Star) is included with that package where you can actually contact someone through it in an emergency (the salespeople demonstrated part of it). And, of course, with the F-Sport package goes the Ultrasonic Blue color...that, as I indicated above, is now available in a package, without buying the actual IS-F model itself.
I definately find the IS250 HP rating pathetic for a luxury vehicle.
But despite that comment I still find the IS one of the best looking car in the Lexus line up.
Did Lexus add any new colors or packages?
#19
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
Yes, I know...that's what I was referring to. As I indicated, the Lexus marketers (probably) figured they didn't need a 6MT on the 250AWD, with the 6-speed automatic's strong popularity with females.
For acceleration, torque is what matters more than HP........HP is more an indication of a vehicle's top speed by overcoming air resistance. And the 350AWD has much more torque than the 250AWD.....277 ft-lbs. to 184, an increase of almost 100.
The AWD only really needed about 30 more HP to be quick enough,IMO.
#20
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Yes, I know...that's what I was referring to. As I indicated, the Lexus marketers (probably) figured they didn't need a 6MT on the 250AWD, with the 6-speed automatic's strong popularity with females.
For acceleration, torque is what matters more than HP........HP is more an indication of a vehicle's top speed by overcoming air resistance. And the 350AWD has much more torque than the 250AWD.....277 ft-lbs. to 184, an increase of almost 100.
For acceleration, torque is what matters more than HP........HP is more an indication of a vehicle's top speed by overcoming air resistance. And the 350AWD has much more torque than the 250AWD.....277 ft-lbs. to 184, an increase of almost 100.
Ok,30-40 more lbs of torque.Usually a bump in HP will increase torque.
#21
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
Thanks.
Yes, I know. But the reason I used the comparison is, because of a number of corporate and economic factors, there really hasn't been much inflation in the general auto industry in the last 10 years or so, except for a couple of entry-level Hyundais/Kias, which cost substantially more than back then. But, those low-line Hyundais/Kias are substantially better-built today, with more quality, and more equipment, than back than. Most new vehicles, though, haven't really gone up that much. And then, of course, you had the Cash-for-Clunkers program last year where the federal Government was subsidizing up to $4500 on each new vehicle, and Federal/State tax credits on new diesels and hybrids....in addition to any manufacturer rebates/discount financing. So, for the most part, many vehicles have been attractively-priced for a number of years. That is why I felt that the IS350AWD (and some of the BMW 3-series models) are priced a little on the steep side for present market conditions.
keep in mind the base price of the 250 rwd is $32K and the 350 rwd $38K ....so comparing those prices to your Is300 for $31K from 10 years ago would be more in-line.
#23
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
Yes, the 3.5L V6, in 350AWD-spec, runs 306 HP to 277 ft-lbs. of torque. But more HP than torque is (usually) the case with non-turbo, N/A V6 powerplants. It's generally the same (or close to it) with the roughly same-size V6s used by most of the Lexus competiton.
#24
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
#25
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
To compete with the AWD 7-series, though, Lexus DOES offer AWD on the LS460....which, I agree, should have been offered on the previous LS430 as well, but wasn't.
#26
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
Though I'm not an engineer, my guess is that it will be more difficult to do AWD on the ES models, because of the transversely-mounted powerplant, than it was for the IS/LS models and their longitudionally-mounted engines. Usually, it is easier with a north-south powerplant, because the engine's output shaft and transmission doesn't require as many diffent gears (or as much hardware) to change direction and re-route the power to the center/rear differentials and drive-shafts.
#28
Lexus Champion