Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
View Poll Results: Big SUVs death ahead?
No, they will continue to be bought in solid numbers
14
56.00%
Yes, they will start a downward spiral to small sales figures
11
44.00%
Not sure
0
0%
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll

The Big SUV's death rattle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-03-10, 09:04 AM
  #1  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post The Big SUV's death rattle

http://autos.yahoo.com/articles/auto...-death-rattle/

Popcorn!

FORTUNE -- Looking for bright spots in auto sales so far in 2010 is like hunting for diamonds in a parking lot at Wal-Mart. You are hard pressed to find anything, and when you do, you have to examine it closely to determine its actual worth.

Some analysts have seized on a zircon they may be mistaking for a diamond: the surge in sales of big SUVs. According to Dave Cutting of JD Power, sales of large utilities like the Chevrolet Suburban have risen 22%, while large premium utilities, exemplified by Mercedes' GL 450, are up 21%.
MORE AT CNNMONEY.COM


That's in an overall market up only 15%.

The mini-boom in SUVs is thought to be a sign that one, like frogs in boiling water, Americans have become accustomed to higher gasoline prices, and two, they won't give up their oversize vehicles until someone pries their cold dead hands off the steering wheel.

In reality, the phenomenon may be nothing more than a death rattle. Customers are hurrying to buy SUVs before they become extinct.

"With the exception of the new Jeep Grand Cherokee, no real SUVs are being introduced anymore," says Jeremy Anwyl, CEO of Edmunds.com. "Today, the ideal utility vehicle looks like it can climb Mount Everest but rides around town efficiently and smoothly."

In other words, it isn't an SUV but a crossover.

Crossovers combine the design features of SUVs like an upright stance, command seating position, high ground clearance, and all-wheel drive with passenger car characteristics such as a comfortable ride, easy handling, and decent fuel economy.

Starting from nothing 15 years ago, sales of crossovers passed those of traditional SUVs in 2006 and have kept on growing. They now exceed two million. Traditional SUVs, meanwhile, peaked in 2002 around three million, and now account for less than one million sales. So far in 2010, crossover sales have leapt ahead 24%, and crossovers now account for 23.7% of the market -- nearly a quarter of it.

Manufacturers keep adding crossovers to their lineups and they come in all sizes -- small, medium, large -- and soon a convertible. Nissan is scheduled to offer a droptop version of its popular Murano crossover in 2011. Honda CR-V, which pioneered the crossover category leads the compact segment, has sold 106,928 units so far this year. But it gets strong competition from Toyota's RAV4 and the Ford Escape. Among mid-size to large crossovers, there is a tight four-way race going on among the Chevy Traverse, Honda Pilot, Ford Edge, and Kia Sorento.

Some crossovers, like the Audi Allroad and Toyota Venza reflect a station-wagon ancestry. "Most consumers in this space want the look of the SUV but the driveability and efficiency of a station wagon," says Anwyl. The wagon look isn't very popular these days, which explains why Subaru raised the roof of its popular Outback to make it more SUV-like. But Anwyl likes the utility that wagons offer. "Our team believes the Cadillac CTS wagon is a far better vehicle than the SRX crossover, but people are choosing the crossover even when the wagon makes more sense."

As manufacturers discontinue old-style SUVs, they're moving their nameplates to crossovers. The next Chevy Tahoe is going to be built on the Traverse crossover platform, not the Silverado truck platform. And the 2011 Ford Explorer moves from the Ranger truck platform to the Taurus car platform. Equipped with Ford's turbocharged four-cylinder engine, it is expected to get 30% better fuel economy -- 19 miles per gallon city versus 13 mpg for the V-6 equipped 2010 model.

At its best, the auto industry is Darwinistic, with the new and improved driving out the old and outmoded, and the change from SUVs to crossovers is a prime example of how it evolves.

The crossover offers improved flexibility and utility without the penalties of fuel economy and comfort. It will be interesting to see how it mutates. The convertible Murano may be only the first step.
 
Old 09-03-10, 09:15 AM
  #2  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,422
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Americans have become accustomed to higher gasoline prices,
Actually, they are not all that high. Gas prices have actually been pretty stable for quite some time now...generally in the $2.60-2.80 range for regular (perhaps a little more in some places).

The wagon look isn't very popular these days, which explains why Subaru raised the roof of its popular Outback to make it more SUV-like.
Incorrect. Outbacks have sold like hotcakes since their 1995 introduction, no matter what the height of the roof...even with the latest redesign.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 09-03-10, 09:21 AM
  #3  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,422
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

"With the exception of the new Jeep Grand Cherokee, no real SUVs are being introduced anymore," says Jeremy Anwyl, CEO of Edmunds.com. "Today, the ideal utility vehicle looks like it can climb Mount Everest but rides around town efficiently and smoothly."
I'm not sure what he is getting at. A number of vehicles today, not just the Grand Cherokee, fit that description today. And, yes, they are still "real" SUVs, if you mean off-road-capable.

The next Chevy Tahoe is going to be built on the Traverse crossover platform, not the Silverado truck platform.
That may cost it customers. Many Tahoe/Suburban buyers want that big truck-frame for a reason....and are not much concerned about gas mileage....and if they want a Traverse, they will just go ahead and buy a Traverse, so the Tahoe doesn't need to compete with it on the same platform.

Last edited by mmarshall; 09-03-10 at 09:27 AM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 09-03-10, 09:23 AM
  #4  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall

Incorrect. Outbacks have sold like hotcakes since their 1995 introduction, no matter what the height of the roof...even with the latest redesign.
Incorrect for the following reasons:

1. It's classified as Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD by EPA, official scorekeeper.

2. It's sized (including height and weight) like an SUV, easily comparable to crossover SUVs because it is.

3. Subaru calls it a wagon, for marketing reasons only.

4. Subaru wants it classified and had it classified as an "SUV" because they can take advantage of this classification when meeting CAFE requirements, safety regs (including dark rear windows tinting that cannot be done on sedan/wagon by the manufacturer), and unique emission regs.
In other words the "SUV" classification was no accident.

Last edited by IS-SV; 09-03-10 at 09:32 AM. Reason: sp
IS-SV is offline  
Old 09-03-10, 09:32 AM
  #5  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,422
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IS-SV
Incorrect for the following reasons:

1. It's classified as Sport Utility Vehicle - 4WD by EPA, official scorekeeper.

2. It's sized (including height and weight) like an SUV, easily comparable to crossover SUVs because it is.

3. Subaru calls it a wagon, for marketing reasons only.

What you say is correct, but that was not the context I was saying. Outbacks have sold well, no matter what the roof-height was.

Originally Posted by IS-SV
Subaru wants it classified and had it classified as an "SUV" because they can take advantage of this classification when meeting CAFE requirements, safety regs (including rear window tint), and unique emission regs.

That was correct at the time, but the Outback now has the same safety/emissions gear that regular cars do...even a Partial-Zero engine now.
My 2006 also does...except for the partial-zero engine.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 09-03-10, 09:33 AM
  #6  
gshb
Lead Lap
 
gshb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

going to guess big SUVs will continue to sell well and not just in the US despite the move to crossovers. i just got a used LX470 which saves a lot compared to a new big SUV. only thing now is trying to source parts, which im finding out is pretty hard.
gshb is offline  
Old 09-03-10, 09:35 AM
  #7  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
What you say is correct, but that was not the context I was saying. Outbacks have sold well, no matter what the roof-height was.


That was correct at the time, but the Outback now has the same safety/emissions gear that regular cars do...even a Partial-Zero engine now.
My 2006 also does...except for the partial-zero engine.
Agreed, Outback sold well and is even selling better today as a SUV.

Today being September 3, 2010, and the facts I listed represent what Subaru is selling today.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 09-03-10, 09:37 AM
  #8  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

The new Grand Cherokee isn't an real SUV, its a crossover based on Mercedes ML. When you combine its unibody construction with independent front and rear suspension, it's not much different from Lexus RX, Acura MDX, and other crossovers.
Och is offline  
Old 09-03-10, 09:48 AM
  #9  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Agreed on Jeep Grand Cherokee chassis.

But the difference (when compared to RX, MDX, other crossovers) is the offroad capability that has been designed-in and thoroughly tested.

That's probably what the Edmunds writer was trying to point out.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 09-03-10, 11:34 AM
  #10  
I8ABMR
Lexus Fanatic
 
I8ABMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Waiting for next track day
Posts: 22,608
Received 102 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

I think the large SUVs will still be sold but they will adapts and become more efficient . Americans are BIG and their kids are BIG. We are also well to do relatively and need space for all of the food and other stuff that we buy
I8ABMR is offline  
Old 09-03-10, 08:08 PM
  #11  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Forum Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,310
Received 126 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

There will always be big SUV's, because there is a demand for them. And truth be told, some folks do need them for other things, other than kids soccer practices
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 09-04-10, 12:48 AM
  #12  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,736
Received 170 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

I think there is still a great need for large SUV's. Take one drive around any campground, lake, boat dock/marina, amusement park, ski lodge, rodeo, ranch, munincipal agency, police/fire/forestry department, construction company and you'll see a healthy showing. I agree, they are not the soccer mom haulers they once were. But the potential is there if they are built more efficiently. American still equates bigger to better.
Some further thoughts about the Subaru Outback. It is a niche vehicle and has been successful for Subaru. But that doesn't mean it's a wide seller or sells in masses. There is a difference. Generally speaking, Americans shy away from vehicles that look like station wagons or hatchbacks.
Fizzboy7 is offline  
Old 09-04-10, 12:51 AM
  #13  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,736
Received 170 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Perhaps it's the lower gas prices of the last few months that have fueled large SUV sales. Usually sales of these fluctuate along with the price of gas.
Fizzboy7 is offline  
Old 09-04-10, 01:21 AM
  #14  
Indio
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Indio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Those who went out and took a bath trading in full size SUV's and trucks while overpaying for econoboxes are regretting it now, big SUV's suit my needs and style so no plans here to change, the Suburban has been around for 75 years, Americans and big trucks go together, so when gas prices rise just cut out the unnecessary driving.
Indio is offline  
Old 09-04-10, 04:30 AM
  #15  
caddyowner
Lead Lap
 
caddyowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 4,810
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I think large SUV sales will shrink back to levels seen in the early to mid-90s, when they were considered to be trucks for hauling and towing rather than being driven by soccer moms. Some people will still need vehicles with that level of utility, but families that simply need to schlep kids to activities and go on family trips will opt for the more appropriate-sized crossover - just as they did with minivans for so many years.

I have to laugh that young parents still hate the minivan. Two of my neighbors with young kids used to have Chrysler minivans for the wives to drive. Both of them went to crossovers this summer, a Honda Pilot and a Dodge Journey. In one of the families, the father is a sales manager at a Toyota store for a large multi-brand dealer. I expected him to bring home a "Swagger wagon" instead of a Pilot.
caddyowner is offline  


Quick Reply: The Big SUV's death rattle



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:05 PM.