The BEAST... BMW X6 M pulls 4.3 second 0-60
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
The X5M is just as talanted but makes more sense with much more utility. Looks better to me as well. I've seen both together recently.
#24
Lexus Champion
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC/ATL
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#25
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lake Country, WI
Posts: 2,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Similarly optioned:
BMW X5 M
0-60 4.5 secs, .91g skid pad
MPG- 14/18
Cost- $89,985
Porsche Cayenne Turbo-S
0-60 4.7 secs, .90g skid pad
MPG- 13/18
Cost- $130,690
No contest...............
BMW X5 M
0-60 4.5 secs, .91g skid pad
MPG- 14/18
Cost- $89,985
Porsche Cayenne Turbo-S
0-60 4.7 secs, .90g skid pad
MPG- 13/18
Cost- $130,690
No contest...............
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
To be fair that is the base price of the X6 M I got it to $102 grand loaded...still a lot cheaper...
A Porsche is a Porsche .....and will be priced as such
I got the Turbo S to 135k....most options are exterior mods....
Turbo starts at 99k...
I'd take a GTS with the manual over both
A Porsche is a Porsche .....and will be priced as such
I got the Turbo S to 135k....most options are exterior mods....
Turbo starts at 99k...
I'd take a GTS with the manual over both
#27
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lake Country, WI
Posts: 2,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#30
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: GA
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts