Cars.com Names Most-Improved and Worst Cars of the Decade
09-02-09, 07:45 AM
#1
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Cars.com Names Most-Improved and Worst Cars of the Decade
CHICAGO, Sept. 1 /PRNewswire/ -- With 2010 model year vehicles already on dealer lots, Cars.com editors reminisced on the good, the bad and the ugly of the past decade to compile their top ten most-improved and worst cars of the decade.
"Despite the current gloom, automakers have really stepped up the past decade and have put out some great vehicles," says Patrick Olsen, editor in chief of Cars.com. "We've seen mass adoption of new vehicle types like crossovers and hybrids. On the other hand, we've also seen a lot of duds."
In order to be considered as one of the most-improved or worst cars of the decade, a car had to be sold at any point in the 2000s; some of these models were only on the market for a few years, while others are still being sold today.
Worst Cars of the 2000s:
Whether poorly executed, ill-conceived or downright dreadful to look at, the 10 cars listed below stood out to the Cars.com editors for all the wrong reasons.
10. Pontiac Aztek (2001-2005): The Aztek was criticized for the duration of its life for its ghastly styling. Were the critics wrong? Yeah, we didn't think so.
9. Daewoo Anything (1999-2002): We had just tested a Suzuki Esteem and marveled at how competent even the cheapest little econoboxes had become when a leather-lined Leganza midsize sedan showed up -- the best Daewoo had to offer. We mused over which would kill us first: the toxic gases from the cheap interior or the recalcitrant transmission and inconsistent acceleration. Three days into the loan, the first Daewoo crash tests in U.S. history came out, and we called Daewoo and told them to come pick up the car. We'd never done that before, and we haven't since.
8. Isuzu VehiCROSS (1999-2002): The outrageous Isuzu VehiCROSS two-door SUV, whose extreme styling drew varied reactions, lasted from 1999 to 2001, and even that's surprising. The fanglike grille uprights made it look like it would eat you, which was scary mainly because inside the VehiCROSS was a place no one wanted to be.
7. Jaguar X-Type (2002-2008): In the early 2000s, the class of entry-level luxury cars was growing. Wanting in, Jaguar came out with the X-Type. Sharing its front-drive platform with a European Ford Mondeo, the X-Type was a too-small, not-so-sporty sedan with all-wheel drive that was hamstrung by some of the forewarned quality issues.
6. Pontiac Sunfire (1995-2005): The Sunfire managed the rare feat of having a worse interior than its GM twin, the Chevy Cavalier. Cheap interior plastics run amok, a coarse four-cylinder engine and horrendous crash-test ratings sealed its fate.
5. Cadillac Catera (1997-2001): In the late '90s, the Opel Omega begat a Cadillac that was sporty in theory but soft and underpowered in practice, rear-wheel-drive in design but front-wheel-drive in feel. And that's just the car. Cadillac didn't help its case with advertising that included the tagline "The Caddy That Zigs," supermodel Cindy Crawford, an animated duck, and the suggestion to "lease a Catera" with the response, "Who's Lisa Catera?" The geniuses responsible for the Catera should have been exiled, but we suspect they went on to develop something called the Pontiac Aztek.
4. Toyota Echo (2000-2005): The Echo subcompact's high seating position and center-mounted instrument panel were two well-intentioned features that were summarily rejected by consumers (though they would find their proponents in later years and other models). Call the Echo ahead of its time if you must; mainly it just wasn't a very good car.
3. Jeep Compass (2007-present): The Compass doesn't belong in the Jeep lineup, a brand known and respected for its off-road ability. It's a soft-roading poseur, and not a good one at that.
2. Chrysler Sebring (1995-present): The previous-generation Sebring wasn't a bad car in its day, but Chrysler dropped the ball with the redesigned 2007 model. With a weak base powertrain, uncomfortable front seats, poor interior quality and haphazard styling, it never had a chance in the highly competitive midsize-sedan segment.
1. Smart ForTwo (2008-present): We don't have a problem with small cars in general (we're big fans of the Mini Cooper), just with ones that don't deliver on the benefits of going small. The pint-sized ForTwo sacrifices a lot of passenger space for a relatively unimpressive 41 mpg on the highway, has an SUV-like propensity to roll over, and is equipped with an aggravating sequential manual transmission. Sure, the ForTwo looks cute, but after you drive it you won't be smiling anymore.
Most-Improved Cars of the 2000s:
Most-improved awards are a mixed blessing: part insult, part praise. Such is the case with Cars.com editor's top 10.
10. Saturn Vue: The Saturn Vue was in a relatively good position when it launched in 2002. Unfortunately, the Vue was underwhelming. The 2008 Vue redesign garnered a reaction more often attributed to the all-new Chevy Malibu: "This is a GM interior?!" The classed-up Vue is worlds better than the original.
9. Cadillac Escalade: 10 years ago Lincoln was dominating pop culture with a concept any reasonable auto exec would have thought ridiculous: a full-size luxury SUV. GM saw the popularity and promptly slapped some Cadillac badges and leather on a Chevrolet Tahoe and called it the 1999 Escalade. Not enough lipstick, too much pig. But Cadillac went all-out for the 2001 model, which leapfrogged the Navigator in terms of power and interior quality, and before long it was the Caddy that you saw in the hands of hip-hop artists, real and imagined. For posterity, drive a late-model Escalade or Escalade Hybrid before they're extinct. You'll be impressed.
8. Mercedes-Benz C-Class: The painfully plain 2000 C-Class counted among its engines a supercharged 2.3-liter four-cylinder that had all the refinement of a burr grinder. Its aesthetics were as appealing as a larger Mercedes, which is to say ... yawn. Thankfully, a 2001 redesign updated the C's exterior styling, though it still looked like an S-Class that had shrunk in the wash. For 2008, Mercedes got the message, and the C-Class leaves the decade with edgier styling, more interior space and even some sporty reflexes to lure buyers away from Audi and BMW.
7. Cadillac CTS: When the Cadillac CTS hit the market in 2003, American auto writers went overboard with praise. The car's handling was the closest any domestic car had come to competing with European luxury sedans, which was promising, but the exterior styling looked like it had been yanked off the drawing board unfinished. The CTS makes the list because of the brilliant 2008-09 model, perhaps the most world-class vehicle ever to come out of Detroit. The styling, performance and interior quality are stunning and quintessentially American.
6. Kia Sportage: Kia resurrected the Sportage name in 2005 after a two-year hiatus, so perhaps this is a technicality. We're citing the Sportage compact SUV because it represents a couple of important milestones: the move from truck-based to car-based SUVs, and Kia's transformation from a punch line to a formidable market competitor. Though a decent-looking little SUV, the 2000-02 Sportage was based on a rear-wheel-drive truck platform with old-fashioned recirculating-ball steering, an unrefined drivetrain, a noisy interior and -- at best -- 19 mpg. The 2005-09 Sportage is a roomier, more refined car-based model that gets 22 mpg despite its added features and improved crashworthiness. The Sportage has come a long way.
5. Nissan Altima: A little-known fact: The Nissan Altima is the third-best-selling midsize sedan in the U.S., nipping at the Honda Accord's and Toyota Camry's heels. Its accomplishment since 2002 is how it's provided sportier looks and driving than the big dogs have, without sacrificing livability.
4. Hyundai Sonata: The 1999-2005 Sonata wasn't exactly exceptional. It was a step up from the previous generation, yes, but it had a lingering low-budget finish and was a step behind the class leaders in crash tests. The 2006 redesign was a sucker-punch to the competition -- a bargain-priced entry loaded with standard features, including six airbags and stability control. It had sharp styling and competitive interior quality, both of which improved in 2009, along with power and efficiency.
3. Toyota Prius: The 2004-09 Toyota Prius is a marvel -- not simply because it's so efficient, affordable and reliable, nor because it has single handedly brought about global acceptance of new and scary technology. No, it's a marvel because even when it yielded its position to the next-generation 2010 Prius, it still reigned as the most efficient and affordable hybrid on the market. The original Prius that was sold in the U.S. -- from 2001 to 2003 -- was a technological triumph for its time, but it was nothing like the phenomenon that soon took its place.
2. Ford Mustang: The Mustang's redesign for 2005 made it a very good car -- and, at the time, the only remaining model in the muscle-car class. It's on this list, though, because its predecessor was beat. The 2004 model year was the car's 25th year on a platform Ford had long since abandoned for other purposes. Those 'Stangs shuddered out of dealerships as if bolts and welds were missing. The seating position and interior quality were equally unrefined. Come 2005, the new Mustang's retro styling was the highlight of auto shows and the driver of many, many sales, but the new chassis is what really kept this model in the game.
1. Chevrolet Malibu: The Malibu has been a critical and sales success since its redesign for 2008, especially in terms of its interior quality and refinement. It's not only competitive with leading midsize sedans, it surpasses a few in some respects, including mileage. Its spot atop our most-improved list, though, has more to do with its poor showing in its prior two generations. It was a rental-car staple through 2003, followed by an overly hyped redesign in 2004 whose peculiar styling, vague steering and interior quality didn't deliver.
About Cars.com
Cars.com is the leading destination for online car shoppers, offering credible, easy-to-understand information from consumers and experts to help buyers formulate opinions on what to buy, where to buy and how much to pay for a car. With comprehensive pricing information, side-by-side comparison tools, photo galleries, videos, unbiased editorial content and a large selection of new- and used-car inventory, Cars.com puts millions of car buyers in control of their shopping process with the information they need to make confident buying decisions.
Launched in June 1998, Cars.com is a division of Classified Ventures, LLC, which is owned by leading media companies, including Belo (NYSE: BLC), Gannett Co., Inc. (NYSE: GCI), The McClatchy Company (NYSE: MNI), Tribune Company and The Washington Post Company (NYSE: WPO).
SOURCE Cars.com
"Despite the current gloom, automakers have really stepped up the past decade and have put out some great vehicles," says Patrick Olsen, editor in chief of Cars.com. "We've seen mass adoption of new vehicle types like crossovers and hybrids. On the other hand, we've also seen a lot of duds."
In order to be considered as one of the most-improved or worst cars of the decade, a car had to be sold at any point in the 2000s; some of these models were only on the market for a few years, while others are still being sold today.
Worst Cars of the 2000s:
Whether poorly executed, ill-conceived or downright dreadful to look at, the 10 cars listed below stood out to the Cars.com editors for all the wrong reasons.
10. Pontiac Aztek (2001-2005): The Aztek was criticized for the duration of its life for its ghastly styling. Were the critics wrong? Yeah, we didn't think so.
9. Daewoo Anything (1999-2002): We had just tested a Suzuki Esteem and marveled at how competent even the cheapest little econoboxes had become when a leather-lined Leganza midsize sedan showed up -- the best Daewoo had to offer. We mused over which would kill us first: the toxic gases from the cheap interior or the recalcitrant transmission and inconsistent acceleration. Three days into the loan, the first Daewoo crash tests in U.S. history came out, and we called Daewoo and told them to come pick up the car. We'd never done that before, and we haven't since.
8. Isuzu VehiCROSS (1999-2002): The outrageous Isuzu VehiCROSS two-door SUV, whose extreme styling drew varied reactions, lasted from 1999 to 2001, and even that's surprising. The fanglike grille uprights made it look like it would eat you, which was scary mainly because inside the VehiCROSS was a place no one wanted to be.
7. Jaguar X-Type (2002-2008): In the early 2000s, the class of entry-level luxury cars was growing. Wanting in, Jaguar came out with the X-Type. Sharing its front-drive platform with a European Ford Mondeo, the X-Type was a too-small, not-so-sporty sedan with all-wheel drive that was hamstrung by some of the forewarned quality issues.
6. Pontiac Sunfire (1995-2005): The Sunfire managed the rare feat of having a worse interior than its GM twin, the Chevy Cavalier. Cheap interior plastics run amok, a coarse four-cylinder engine and horrendous crash-test ratings sealed its fate.
5. Cadillac Catera (1997-2001): In the late '90s, the Opel Omega begat a Cadillac that was sporty in theory but soft and underpowered in practice, rear-wheel-drive in design but front-wheel-drive in feel. And that's just the car. Cadillac didn't help its case with advertising that included the tagline "The Caddy That Zigs," supermodel Cindy Crawford, an animated duck, and the suggestion to "lease a Catera" with the response, "Who's Lisa Catera?" The geniuses responsible for the Catera should have been exiled, but we suspect they went on to develop something called the Pontiac Aztek.
4. Toyota Echo (2000-2005): The Echo subcompact's high seating position and center-mounted instrument panel were two well-intentioned features that were summarily rejected by consumers (though they would find their proponents in later years and other models). Call the Echo ahead of its time if you must; mainly it just wasn't a very good car.
3. Jeep Compass (2007-present): The Compass doesn't belong in the Jeep lineup, a brand known and respected for its off-road ability. It's a soft-roading poseur, and not a good one at that.
2. Chrysler Sebring (1995-present): The previous-generation Sebring wasn't a bad car in its day, but Chrysler dropped the ball with the redesigned 2007 model. With a weak base powertrain, uncomfortable front seats, poor interior quality and haphazard styling, it never had a chance in the highly competitive midsize-sedan segment.
1. Smart ForTwo (2008-present): We don't have a problem with small cars in general (we're big fans of the Mini Cooper), just with ones that don't deliver on the benefits of going small. The pint-sized ForTwo sacrifices a lot of passenger space for a relatively unimpressive 41 mpg on the highway, has an SUV-like propensity to roll over, and is equipped with an aggravating sequential manual transmission. Sure, the ForTwo looks cute, but after you drive it you won't be smiling anymore.
Most-Improved Cars of the 2000s:
Most-improved awards are a mixed blessing: part insult, part praise. Such is the case with Cars.com editor's top 10.
10. Saturn Vue: The Saturn Vue was in a relatively good position when it launched in 2002. Unfortunately, the Vue was underwhelming. The 2008 Vue redesign garnered a reaction more often attributed to the all-new Chevy Malibu: "This is a GM interior?!" The classed-up Vue is worlds better than the original.
9. Cadillac Escalade: 10 years ago Lincoln was dominating pop culture with a concept any reasonable auto exec would have thought ridiculous: a full-size luxury SUV. GM saw the popularity and promptly slapped some Cadillac badges and leather on a Chevrolet Tahoe and called it the 1999 Escalade. Not enough lipstick, too much pig. But Cadillac went all-out for the 2001 model, which leapfrogged the Navigator in terms of power and interior quality, and before long it was the Caddy that you saw in the hands of hip-hop artists, real and imagined. For posterity, drive a late-model Escalade or Escalade Hybrid before they're extinct. You'll be impressed.
8. Mercedes-Benz C-Class: The painfully plain 2000 C-Class counted among its engines a supercharged 2.3-liter four-cylinder that had all the refinement of a burr grinder. Its aesthetics were as appealing as a larger Mercedes, which is to say ... yawn. Thankfully, a 2001 redesign updated the C's exterior styling, though it still looked like an S-Class that had shrunk in the wash. For 2008, Mercedes got the message, and the C-Class leaves the decade with edgier styling, more interior space and even some sporty reflexes to lure buyers away from Audi and BMW.
7. Cadillac CTS: When the Cadillac CTS hit the market in 2003, American auto writers went overboard with praise. The car's handling was the closest any domestic car had come to competing with European luxury sedans, which was promising, but the exterior styling looked like it had been yanked off the drawing board unfinished. The CTS makes the list because of the brilliant 2008-09 model, perhaps the most world-class vehicle ever to come out of Detroit. The styling, performance and interior quality are stunning and quintessentially American.
6. Kia Sportage: Kia resurrected the Sportage name in 2005 after a two-year hiatus, so perhaps this is a technicality. We're citing the Sportage compact SUV because it represents a couple of important milestones: the move from truck-based to car-based SUVs, and Kia's transformation from a punch line to a formidable market competitor. Though a decent-looking little SUV, the 2000-02 Sportage was based on a rear-wheel-drive truck platform with old-fashioned recirculating-ball steering, an unrefined drivetrain, a noisy interior and -- at best -- 19 mpg. The 2005-09 Sportage is a roomier, more refined car-based model that gets 22 mpg despite its added features and improved crashworthiness. The Sportage has come a long way.
5. Nissan Altima: A little-known fact: The Nissan Altima is the third-best-selling midsize sedan in the U.S., nipping at the Honda Accord's and Toyota Camry's heels. Its accomplishment since 2002 is how it's provided sportier looks and driving than the big dogs have, without sacrificing livability.
4. Hyundai Sonata: The 1999-2005 Sonata wasn't exactly exceptional. It was a step up from the previous generation, yes, but it had a lingering low-budget finish and was a step behind the class leaders in crash tests. The 2006 redesign was a sucker-punch to the competition -- a bargain-priced entry loaded with standard features, including six airbags and stability control. It had sharp styling and competitive interior quality, both of which improved in 2009, along with power and efficiency.
3. Toyota Prius: The 2004-09 Toyota Prius is a marvel -- not simply because it's so efficient, affordable and reliable, nor because it has single handedly brought about global acceptance of new and scary technology. No, it's a marvel because even when it yielded its position to the next-generation 2010 Prius, it still reigned as the most efficient and affordable hybrid on the market. The original Prius that was sold in the U.S. -- from 2001 to 2003 -- was a technological triumph for its time, but it was nothing like the phenomenon that soon took its place.
2. Ford Mustang: The Mustang's redesign for 2005 made it a very good car -- and, at the time, the only remaining model in the muscle-car class. It's on this list, though, because its predecessor was beat. The 2004 model year was the car's 25th year on a platform Ford had long since abandoned for other purposes. Those 'Stangs shuddered out of dealerships as if bolts and welds were missing. The seating position and interior quality were equally unrefined. Come 2005, the new Mustang's retro styling was the highlight of auto shows and the driver of many, many sales, but the new chassis is what really kept this model in the game.
1. Chevrolet Malibu: The Malibu has been a critical and sales success since its redesign for 2008, especially in terms of its interior quality and refinement. It's not only competitive with leading midsize sedans, it surpasses a few in some respects, including mileage. Its spot atop our most-improved list, though, has more to do with its poor showing in its prior two generations. It was a rental-car staple through 2003, followed by an overly hyped redesign in 2004 whose peculiar styling, vague steering and interior quality didn't deliver.
About Cars.com
Cars.com is the leading destination for online car shoppers, offering credible, easy-to-understand information from consumers and experts to help buyers formulate opinions on what to buy, where to buy and how much to pay for a car. With comprehensive pricing information, side-by-side comparison tools, photo galleries, videos, unbiased editorial content and a large selection of new- and used-car inventory, Cars.com puts millions of car buyers in control of their shopping process with the information they need to make confident buying decisions.
Launched in June 1998, Cars.com is a division of Classified Ventures, LLC, which is owned by leading media companies, including Belo (NYSE: BLC), Gannett Co., Inc. (NYSE: GCI), The McClatchy Company (NYSE: MNI), Tribune Company and The Washington Post Company (NYSE: WPO).
SOURCE Cars.com
09-02-09, 08:18 AM
#4
Lexus Champion
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I love the current C class because the design is almost a radical departure from the traditional conservative Mercedes styling. However, I always found the MY 2000 C class to be very attractive in its own kind of way.
Yes, the design wasn't anything special and it basically looked like a smaller early 1990s S class / E class, but I liked the stately and proud appearance the car gave off. Overall it is a classy car. Boring, yet classy.
The new Malibu is also a great machine, so I gather from the reviews. Anyone remember the older Malibu's? Dear Lord...
Yes, the design wasn't anything special and it basically looked like a smaller early 1990s S class / E class, but I liked the stately and proud appearance the car gave off. Overall it is a classy car. Boring, yet classy.
The new Malibu is also a great machine, so I gather from the reviews. Anyone remember the older Malibu's? Dear Lord...
Trending Topics
09-02-09, 02:12 PM
#9
Lexus Fanatic
I'll agree with most of the list, but they were off on a couple of points.
First, Daewoo products, for some reason, are not very impressive when produced under their own nameplate, but, for some reason (I don't know why
), seem to be far better in quality and fit/finish when produced for other manufacturers. The Suzuki Reno/Forenza/ Verona and the LT2 Chevy Aveo are good examples. All of these vehicles are (or were) Daewoo-produced. The horrendously cheap base Chevy Aveo, though, is another matter.......it is far worse than the nice LT2 version.
Second, the last-generation Toyota Prius was indeed a great small car (though its controls and center-stack instruments were annoying, and its handling was a little on the Roly-Poly side). The new 2010 model though, despite its super-efficient drivetrain, is, IMO, a noticeable let-down from the 2009 model......the interior and sheet metal have been severely cheapened and made out of thinner, flimsier materials. This is noticeable all over the body and interior, from the front end clear to the back bumper.
I'll agree that the second-gen Cadillac CTS was excellent. But the first-generation model was almost insultingly cheap and plain-looking inside, especially for a vehicle with the Cadillac nameplate (same with the wagon SRX version). By Cadillac's request, (I don't know how or when they got my name) I served on a local focus panel, run by a marketing firm, that discussed the car's styling/content. I said then that I thought the original design had several serious flaws.....several of them, BTW, which were addressed with the excellent second-generation model.
The Saturn VUE's second-generation interior fit/finish was indeed an improvement over the original one, but, IMO, the loss of the original thermo-plastic body panels was a BIG loss.
. Those ingenious Saturn panels were superlative. They were light, resisted dings/dents, didn't rust or corrode, and were easy to to replace after an accident. You could, in some cases, even order them from the factory already pre-painted with the unique Saturn water-borne paint job. That's one reason why insurance was so cheap on plastic-body Saturns (the cheapest car I ever had to insure, hands-down, was a plastic-bodied Saturn SL-2).
Most of the rest of the list, though, is pretty much on the mark.
First, Daewoo products, for some reason, are not very impressive when produced under their own nameplate, but, for some reason (I don't know why
), seem to be far better in quality and fit/finish when produced for other manufacturers. The Suzuki Reno/Forenza/ Verona and the LT2 Chevy Aveo are good examples. All of these vehicles are (or were) Daewoo-produced. The horrendously cheap base Chevy Aveo, though, is another matter.......it is far worse than the nice LT2 version.Second, the last-generation Toyota Prius was indeed a great small car (though its controls and center-stack instruments were annoying, and its handling was a little on the Roly-Poly side). The new 2010 model though, despite its super-efficient drivetrain, is, IMO, a noticeable let-down from the 2009 model......the interior and sheet metal have been severely cheapened and made out of thinner, flimsier materials. This is noticeable all over the body and interior, from the front end clear to the back bumper.
I'll agree that the second-gen Cadillac CTS was excellent. But the first-generation model was almost insultingly cheap and plain-looking inside, especially for a vehicle with the Cadillac nameplate (same with the wagon SRX version). By Cadillac's request, (I don't know how or when they got my name) I served on a local focus panel, run by a marketing firm, that discussed the car's styling/content. I said then that I thought the original design had several serious flaws.....several of them, BTW, which were addressed with the excellent second-generation model.
The Saturn VUE's second-generation interior fit/finish was indeed an improvement over the original one, but, IMO, the loss of the original thermo-plastic body panels was a BIG loss.
. Those ingenious Saturn panels were superlative. They were light, resisted dings/dents, didn't rust or corrode, and were easy to to replace after an accident. You could, in some cases, even order them from the factory already pre-painted with the unique Saturn water-borne paint job. That's one reason why insurance was so cheap on plastic-body Saturns (the cheapest car I ever had to insure, hands-down, was a plastic-bodied Saturn SL-2).Most of the rest of the list, though, is pretty much on the mark.
Last edited by mmarshall; 09-02-09 at 02:17 PM.
09-02-09, 02:56 PM
#10
Good list + my $0.02:
Aztek:always liked the interior with cooler/console combo,exterior now sorta OK
Vehicross: Always liked exterior never seen inside
X-type: Front half looks great/rear half OK, drives great w/ 3.0 Sport pkg. I have put several of these thru thier paces zero complaints. It's a Jag but you get what you pay for!
Sunfire: could not detect any progress since the 1987 Sunbird I use to drive
Catera: 1st gen. Cimmaron with new name. V series would buy if I were blind
Sebring: 2001 Conv. still holds my award for worst cowl shake ever
Vue: 1st gen. worst handling new vehicle in this century mostly due to elec. Power steering
MBZ C-class: always a solid entry for it's time. I am always a prospect for C43
new gen is dead on
Altima: possible most improved ever
Mustang: sold my 1994 Conv. when I saw advance pic. of 2005
Aztek:always liked the interior with cooler/console combo,exterior now sorta OK
Vehicross: Always liked exterior never seen inside
X-type: Front half looks great/rear half OK, drives great w/ 3.0 Sport pkg. I have put several of these thru thier paces zero complaints. It's a Jag but you get what you pay for!
Sunfire: could not detect any progress since the 1987 Sunbird I use to drive
Catera: 1st gen. Cimmaron with new name. V series would buy if I were blind
Sebring: 2001 Conv. still holds my award for worst cowl shake ever
Vue: 1st gen. worst handling new vehicle in this century mostly due to elec. Power steering
MBZ C-class: always a solid entry for it's time. I am always a prospect for C43
new gen is dead on
Altima: possible most improved ever
Mustang: sold my 1994 Conv. when I saw advance pic. of 2005
09-02-09, 03:10 PM
#11
Lexus Fanatic
Trust me......the original Dodge 400/Chrysler convertibles from the early 1980s were even worse. Driving them, especially with the top down, was like driving a huge rubber band.
Did you order a new 2005?
Mustang: sold my 1994 Conv. when I saw advance pic. of 2005
09-02-09, 04:48 PM
#12
Lexus Champion
I agree completely with most of that list... especially the new Malibu being the most improved.
Not only is the new one a great car (great enough I ended up with the nearly identical Saturn Aura), but the previous generation was flat out one of the most miserable cars sold during those years... well, I take that back, the generation before the 08+ Malibu was bad but not that bad... the one before that, though? Ridiculously bad. Like so bad I might consider public transportation if it were my only choice for a car.
Not only is the new one a great car (great enough I ended up with the nearly identical Saturn Aura), but the previous generation was flat out one of the most miserable cars sold during those years... well, I take that back, the generation before the 08+ Malibu was bad but not that bad... the one before that, though? Ridiculously bad. Like so bad I might consider public transportation if it were my only choice for a car.
09-02-09, 05:28 PM
#15
Pole Position
