Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Fixing up Ford the Mulally method

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-09, 02:02 PM
  #1  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up Fixing up Ford the Mulally method

Fortune interviews Alan Mulally

http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/1...51103

Some choice quote:







[/

Ford's financial independence is largely due to a new operational discipline that Mulally has installed, as well as some timely strategic moves he initiated. So while GM suffered the ignominy of seeing the Treasury Department's auto task force depose chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner, and Chrysler has declared bankruptcy, Ford stands alone as an independent company and, potentially, a Detroit survivor.


Quote, originally posted by Fortune »
The Mulally method has pointed Ford to some smart strategic moves. Sensing a recession in 2006, Mulally decided to borrow $23.6 billion against Ford's assets. Piling on more debt wasn't an easy call, but the extra cash meant that Ford could say no to government loans when sales fell apart last year. Mulally is moving to integrate the company globally, despite several failed attempts in the past. In 2010, Ford will be selling small cars in the U.S. that were developed in Europe. Mulally persuaded Bill Ford to dispose of Jaguar and Land Rover and focus its resources on the Ford brand, and by moving quickly he managed to sell them to India's Tata in 2007 when there was still a market for makers of luxury vehicles.


Quote, originally posted by Fortuen »
"I arrive here, and the first day I say, 'Let's go look at the product lineup.' And they lay it out, and I said, 'Where's the Taurus?' They said, 'Well, we killed it.' I said, 'What do you mean, you killed it?' 'Well, we made a couple that looked like a football. They didn't sell very well, so we stopped it.' 'You stopped the Taurus?' I said. 'How many billions of dollars does it cost to build brand loyalty around a name?' 'Well, we thought it was so damaged that we named it the Five Hundred.' I said, 'Well, you've got until tomorrow to find a vehicle to put the Taurus name on because that's why I'm here. Then you have two years to make the coolest vehicle that you can possibly make.'?" The 2010 Taurus is arriving on the market this spring, and while it is not as startling as the original 1986 Taurus, it is still pretty cool.
 
Old 05-12-09, 06:21 PM
  #2  
SLegacy99
Lead Lap
 
SLegacy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 4,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My Ford stock is way down today.
SLegacy99 is offline  
Old 05-12-09, 06:48 PM
  #3  
bad co
Lexus Champion
 
bad co's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Park Ridge IL
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yup down a buck
bad co is offline  
Old 05-12-09, 08:05 PM
  #4  
BLK98GS3
Lead Lap
 
BLK98GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SLegacy99
My Ford stock is way down today.

Thats because they sold more stock to raise cash.
BLK98GS3 is offline  
Old 05-13-09, 03:39 AM
  #5  
rdgdawg
Pole Position
 
rdgdawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lake Country, WI
Posts: 2,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mulally had the ***** to invest in future design while hoarding as much cash as possible for the company... how do you pull that off? Then, when offered bailout money, he said, "No thanks, our plan works..."

4+ months after sitting on the Hill, how are GM and Chrysler doing WITH bailout money? Guess they should've started about 3 years ago like Ford, ehhh???

Mulally early leader for CEO of the Year... because he had the stones to DO SOMETHING... and it's working in a down economy...
rdgdawg is offline  
Old 05-13-09, 10:21 AM
  #6  
werewolf
Lexus Test Driver
 
werewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

The fact that Mulally doesn't come from a car company (doesn't love steel) is a big deal
werewolf is offline  
Old 05-13-09, 02:46 PM
  #7  
bruce van
Lexus Champion
 
bruce van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So far, Mullaly is doing a pretty good. I'm glad at least one American car company has a CEO who kind of gets it and sees where the problems lie.

If I'm in the market for a domestic product, Ford is definitely going to be on the top of my shopping list. The new Fiesta looks hot. They just need to drop the Fiesta name because it is completely lame.
bruce van is offline  
Old 05-13-09, 05:01 PM
  #8  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,587
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Quote, originally posted by Fortuen »
"I arrive here, and the first day I say, 'Let's go look at the product lineup.' And they lay it out, and I said, 'Where's the Taurus?' They said, 'Well, we killed it.' I said, 'What do you mean, you killed it?' 'Well, we made a couple that looked like a football. They didn't sell very well, so we stopped it.' 'You stopped the Taurus?' I said. 'How many billions of dollars does it cost to build brand loyalty around a name?' 'Well, we thought it was so damaged that we named it the Five Hundred.' I said, 'Well, you've got until tomorrow to find a vehicle to put the Taurus name on because that's why I'm here. Then you have two years to make the coolest vehicle that you can possibly make.'?"

I'm was not impressed with Mullaly's decision here. I think he was (and is) wrong (though that could change). Yes, the Taurus nameplate sold well for many years, but Ford, IMO, did exactly the right thing naming that newer car the Five Hundred and not the Taurus. It was NOT a Taurus; in fact, IMO, it was a far BETTER car than the Taurus, especially with the AWD option. All the renaming did, IMO, was to bring back a chintsy name to a nice vehicle worthy of something better than that.

Of course, now that the Taurus SHO is on the way, the name change back to Taurus may (?) or may not have been justified in the long run....we'll wait and see how the SHO sells. The two previous Taurus SHOs pretty much bombed out in the marketplace because they cost as much or more than rival Pontiac Grand Prix GTO/GXP models and produced less power, even with the Yamaha-built V6s and V8s. Pontiac, though, this time, will not be as much as a factor....they will be gone in less than 2 years, and the new Taurus SHO, despite the chintzy Taurus name, appears to be a far better product than the first two SHOs were.

Last edited by mmarshall; 05-13-09 at 05:05 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LexFather
Car Chat
15
12-25-10 05:41 AM
rdgdawg
Car Chat
11
04-19-09 02:43 AM
LexusLuver
Car Chat
12
01-10-05 01:24 PM



Quick Reply: Fixing up Ford the Mulally method



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:38 PM.