Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Nissan addresses tranny issue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-09, 08:35 AM
  #1  
speedflex
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
 
speedflex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: MO
Posts: 2,545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Nissan addresses tranny issue

Nissan Modifies the GT-R's Launch Control To End Warranty Issues With the $22,000 Transaxle

Legendary heroes always have a fatal vulnerability. Achilles had his heel and Superman has Kryptonite. The Nissan GT-R, supposedly, has its transaxle.

In the great unverifiable stew of message boards on the Internet, you can read about rumors of GT-R trannies grenading the moment a driver engaged the launch control feature and then (naturally) launched his all-wheel-drive 480-horsepower supercar.

Then — rumor atop rumor — there are stories about Nissan voiding warranties simply because a driver engages the highly touted launch control system, so that once the intricate transaxle fails, the owner is left with the choice of either paying $22,415.38 (plus $1,380 for installation labor) for a new one or turning their GT-R into a garden planter. Although Nissan won't comment, we know there is some litigation being pursued by GT-R owners regarding this.

Is the Nissan GT-R's unique rear-mounted, computer-controlled dual-clutch six-speed transaxle really so fragile? Is Nissan really running away from a launch control feature it once promoted so heavily? Are GT-R warranties falling like Don Barzini at the end of The Godfather? We have some answers.

The Imminent Change
"In our view," says Scott Vazin, Nissan North America's chief of product public relations, during a conference call with Inside Line, "this has been blown way out of proportion."

According to Nissan, "less than 1 percent" of the transaxles in the GT-Rs delivered to customers in the United States have failed in some way. With somewhere between 1,750 and 1,800 GT-Rs in the garages of American enthusiasts, this puts the number of transaxle failures experienced in this country at somewhere between 16 and 19 cars. This is not an insignificant number of GT-Rs, but it's short of an epidemic of transaxle failures.

Regardless, Nissan has already instituted a running software change to the onboard computers of any still unsold 2009 Nissan GT-Rs. This software modifies the action of the Vehicle Dynamic Control (VDC), which incorporates the so-called launch control protocol. This affects about 50 GT-Rs that are currently awaiting dealer allocation at Nissan's facility at the Port of Long Beach in Southern California. The new software will also be offered as a retrofit — with Nissan's vigorous encouragement — to the current owners of the 2009 Nissan GT-R.

This is a software change for all R35 GT-Rs worldwide, Nissan asserts; it isn't limited to the litigious United States.

How It Works
The revised programming, Nissan promises, will offer acceleration similar to that with the current launch control, but will do so while the Vehicle Dynamic Control (VDC) system remains on. Instead of launching at 4,500 rpm as the original launch control system does, the new system will launch at considerably fewer revs. (Nissan isn't quite sure what this final number will be, but it will be more than the 2,000 rpm currently used when the car is brake-torqued for an acceleration run with the VDC turned on.)

Launching hard with the VDC turned off, however, does potentially void the warranty on the transaxle (though the rest of the car's warranty is unaffected). In fact, the GT-R owner's manual has always expressly warned against driving with the VDC system turned off except when trying to extract the vehicle when it's stuck in mud or snow. And the internal memory of the GT-R's computers will tattle on an owner who launches with VDC turned off. Indeed, it will record any events in which the VDC is turned off.

What Nissan Says
Here's the whole text of a letter Nissan sent to all its dealers today regarding the GT-R software change:

Nissan has enhanced the Model Year (MY) 2009 GT-R by incorporating new MY 2010 programming that will optimize clutch engagement control for improved drivability. This upgrade also improves vehicle acceleration with the Vehicle Dynamic Control (VDC) ON/activated.

Nissan will provide this MY 2010 specification upgrade to MY 2009 GT-R owners at no additional cost. Nissan has already incorporated this programming into the GT-R vehicles in its U.S. inventory and will resume shipping of those vehicles to dealers. We will advise you soon on how to install this new program into all MY 2009 GT-Rs (see below).

The GT-R will continue to offer supercar characteristics of exceptional handling, maneuvering and overall driving experience. This upgrade provides the consumer improved drivability and enhanced acceleration performance with VDC ON (as required by the warranty). Standing acceleration capability with VDC ON (VDC-R mode) will improve compared to the original model-year 2009 performance while such acceleration with VDC OFF will be moderated. Customers should be reminded to drive safely and obey all traffic laws. [Please note independent media reports of 0-60 drive times with VDC OFF (or what the media call "Launch Control") on closed-courses with professional drivers will likely increase after this change.]

The GT-R Owner's Manual expressly warns against driving with the VDC OFF (except to free the vehicle when stuck in mud or snow) to avoid damage. Repeated acceleration launches with VDC OFF have resulted in some reported instances of damage to the transaxle. Repairs for damage caused by driving with VDC OFF are expressly excluded under the terms of the Nissan GT-R New Car Limited Warranty... Except when stuck, there is no reason to drive with VDC OFF.

This change was initially implemented with the start of MY 2010 GT-R production and has been completed for all 2009 GT-Rs still in NNA inventory... In a few weeks, you will receive the Technical Service Bulletin explaining how to implement this specification change for all remaining 2009 GT-Rs...

Bottom line, the GT-R with the revised software will be quicker with the VDC on, but not as quick as it was before with the VDC turned off. Only a trip to the track will reveal exactly how performance will be affected. That's why Inside Line plans to take the 2009 Nissan GT-R that we purchased for long-term testing to the track as soon as we can get the new software installed.

The Part in Question

As sophisticated as the GT-R is, there's no single component aboard this starship that's more technically advanced than the transaxle. Tasked to contend with the twin-turbocharged 3.8-liter V-6's 480 hp and 430 pound- feet of peak torque, it has to be robust. But it also has to reliably distribute power to all four wheels, respond instantly to the driver's gear selection and enable the car to putter around smoothly at low speed. This is simply one of the most technologically advanced automotive components on Earth.

In fact, Inside Line's own GT-R (purchased outright and not part of any Nissan public relations fleet) had its transaxle replaced at Santa Monica Nissan when fluid was found around one of the seals. "I've been regularly servicing six or seven GT-Rs here and yours is the only one that's needed a transmission," said Doug Chaske, our service advisor at Santa Monica Nissan.

"When something goes wrong with a GT-R," Chaske further explained, "we're supposed to call Nissan. It's not like when something goes wrong with an Altima and we can determine what to do ourselves. With the GT-R, Nissan always sends out an engineer. And they determine what to do."

The Ownership Experience

Most GT-R owners that Inside Line has contacted did report using launch control, but they suffered no ill effects. Darryl Alison, whose JspecConnect.com imported two right-hand-drive Japanese-market R35 GT-Rs before he became the first person to take delivery of a U.S.-market GT-R, has had no problem with any of his GT-Rs, including the second U.S.-market car he bought and subsequently modified for increased engine output.

"It has a less restrictive exhaust for more power," Alison says. "We ran it in Sport Compact Car's Ultimate Street Car Challenge and made seven launches. Plus it survived the 'Gross Display of Horsepower' competition and the car still drives fine." Subsequently, Alison also had the memory flashed by Cobb Tuning for even more power and reports no problems with the car.

Yes, some cars that have been launched repeatedly with the VDC off have munched their transmissions. The proof of that is as close as YouTube. For instance, here's Samurai Speed's 600-hp GT-R losing its transmission after the shop says there had been more than 100 runs with launch control.

Despite some Internet postings to the contrary, Inside Line has yet to verify a GT-R transmission failure in a car that didn't endure at least several hard launches with the VDC system turned off.

Extraordinary Car, Extraordinary Treatment

While Nissan is well within its rights according to the warranty to not cover such transmission failures, it also appears that it has covered failed transmissions in GT-Rs that were launched with the VDC off.

For example, one GT-R owner (who insists on anonymity) says that Nissan installed a new transaxle in his car after it failed following several hard VDC-off launches. He also says that as a condition of getting his replacement transmission, he had to sign a non-disclosure agreement, promising not to talk about the circumstances under which his car was repaired. So far Nissan hasn't commented on the existence or non-existence of such non-disclosure agreements.

Nissan is apparently within its rights to deny warranty coverage to any GT-R that regularly operates with the VDC off. And it seems, at least so far, that Nissan has considered GT-R warranty claims on a case-by-case basis. What it will do going forward — particularly for cars with owners who refuse the software change — is open to speculation.

The Nissan GT-R is no ordinary car. And it appears that Nissan is breaking new ground not just in performance but also in the complicated promise a car manufacturer makes to an enthusiast when it sells him leading-edge technology.

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...hotopanel..1.*
speedflex is offline  
Old 01-30-09, 08:42 AM
  #2  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,587
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speedflex
[B]
How It Works
The revised programming, Nissan promises, will offer acceleration similar to that with the current launch control, but will do so while the Vehicle Dynamic Control (VDC) system remains on. Instead of launching at 4,500 rpm as the original launch control system does, the new system will launch at considerably fewer revs. (Nissan isn't quite sure what this final number will be, but it will be more than the 2,000 rpm currently used when the car is brake-torqued for an acceleration run with the VDC turned on.)

Launching hard with the VDC turned off, however, does potentially void the warranty on the transaxle (though the rest of the car's warranty is unaffected). In fact, the GT-R owner's manual has always expressly warned against driving with the VDC system turned off except when trying to extract the vehicle when it's stuck in mud or snow. And the internal memory of the GT-R's computers will tattle on an owner who launches with VDC turned off. Indeed, it will record any events in which the VDC is turned off.
Launching a car from a dead stop from 4500 RPM with the traction control and VDC off, IMO, is gross abuse to start with, even if the engineers allowed that in the programming.

Last edited by mmarshall; 01-30-09 at 08:51 AM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 01-30-09, 08:57 AM
  #3  
Koma
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
Koma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Take that GT-R haters.
Nissan isn't getting rid of LC. You can still turn VDC off and LC but you're still risking your warranty but they have improved VDC-R to allow for closer to LC times.
These transmissions aren't fragile, you guys are just wrecking it.
Besides who cares about 0-60 times? This is a track car meant for corners not just 1/4 miles.
Koma is offline  
Old 01-30-09, 09:06 AM
  #4  
Tekknikal
Lead Lap
 
Tekknikal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: VI
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

am looking forward to the reviews

the other plus factor to it is that it updates the overall programming, so it may help make overall driving better. if they improve system memory and responsiveness further i think i would take it ,esp since i dont launch mine and am not big on that aspect of it
Tekknikal is offline  
Old 01-30-09, 09:17 AM
  #5  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Glad they are updating it but I don't believe the 1% figure. Reminds me of Honda saying only 2% of their trannies blew and its WAAAAY bigger than that.
I am glad to see Nissan protect the GT-Rs legacy here and have a true vested interest in it.
 
Old 01-30-09, 09:55 AM
  #6  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,670
Received 184 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Glad they are updating it but I don't believe the 1% figure. Reminds me of Honda saying only 2% of their trannies blew and its WAAAAY bigger than that.
I am glad to see Nissan protect the GT-Rs legacy here and have a true vested interest in it.
haha i was about to say that, another honda story?

either way, if LC can damage the car in that way, then i agree taking it out completely is the way to go. at the same time, if they have a feature in the car, then they should provide warranty on it. UNLESS they print clearly in the manual saying something like using the LC will void tranny warranty immediately. then it's the owners' call
rominl is offline  
Old 01-30-09, 10:38 AM
  #7  
DASHOCKER
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
DASHOCKER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 12,191
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

It is good that Nissan is adressing this issue considering the neck snapping acceleration this car can deliver. Speaking of neck snapping, anyone see the Top Gear episode in which Clarkson literally snaps his neck in the GTR?
DASHOCKER is offline  
Old 01-30-09, 10:40 AM
  #8  
Rippaflow
Lead Lap
iTrader: (4)
 
Rippaflow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I say just get rid of the launch control...(and yes I know it's their fault) but some people don't read everything they sign...
Rippaflow is offline  
Old 01-30-09, 06:03 PM
  #9  
I8ABMR
Lexus Fanatic
 
I8ABMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Waiting for next track day
Posts: 22,609
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

I told these guys I was right about the launch control. I posted this a few months back stating that one of my family members who works for Nissan Corporate ( regional service manager ) had told me this, but they wouldn't listen. Your random forum info is seldom more reliable than inside info from corporate regional service managers. Anyway.... I am glad Godzilla will not be without the launch control
I8ABMR is offline  
Old 01-30-09, 06:16 PM
  #10  
FKL
Lexus Test Driver
 
FKL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

....so I guess all the naysayers have been deemed moot now?
FKL is offline  
Old 01-30-09, 07:36 PM
  #11  
nthach
Lexus Champion
 
nthach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: California
Posts: 3,350
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

note to Nissan - stop buying trannies from Honda.
nthach is offline  
Old 01-31-09, 01:41 AM
  #12  
Stormwind
Racer
 
Stormwind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That proves it the Japanese manufactures just can't make a proper sports car anymore.
Stormwind is offline  
Old 01-31-09, 05:32 AM
  #13  
speedflex
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
 
speedflex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: MO
Posts: 2,545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Did some of you guys even read the article?
speedflex is offline  
Old 01-31-09, 07:25 AM
  #14  
habeeb89
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (3)
 
habeeb89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nthach
note to Nissan - stop buying trannies from Honda.
lol, my Honda Odyssey's transmission went out at 55k, but got a free replacement due to the recall.
habeeb89 is offline  
Old 01-31-09, 03:59 PM
  #15  
Rippaflow
Lead Lap
iTrader: (4)
 
Rippaflow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nthach
note to Nissan - stop buying trannies from Honda.
My integras automatic tranny was working fine at 226K...no slipping, shifts werent factory smooth but were snap you back hard either. Hmmm...
Rippaflow is offline  


Quick Reply: Nissan addresses tranny issue



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:57 AM.