Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Jeremy Clarkson's Car of the Year: CORVETTE ZR1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-08, 07:21 AM
  #1  
Gojirra99
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Gojirra99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 30,054
Received 189 Likes on 130 Posts
Default Jeremy Clarkson's Car of the Year: CORVETTE ZR1


From The Sunday Times
December 28, 2008

Chevrolet Corvette ZR1
Out of nowhere, my car of the year



Jeremy Clarkson


It’s been a quiet year for the world’s motor industry. There have been no wrecks, nobody drowning; in fact, nothing to laugh at at all. But, hidden in the sea of normality and business as usual, were a couple of gems.

We start with the BMW X6, which must receive my inaugural What Were They Thinking Of award. Have you seen one? No, and I doubt you ever will because in a world that’s plagued with recession and run by people who believe the world’s polar bears are up at the North Pole sipping pina coladas and slapping on the factor five, it is surely the most inappropriate piece of corporate thinking since Sir Clive Sinclair said: “Yes. The electric slipper. That’s what people want . . .”

However, I cannot say the BMW X6 is the worst car of the year, partly because I have not yet driven it and partly because it cannot possibly be worse than the Chrysler Sebring Convertible. Unless it smells of slurry and the radio is jammed on Rap FM.

The Sebring is an extraordinary car. Ugly to behold and hateful to drive, it is not cheap, elegant, comfortable, practical, prestigious, clever, economical, luxurious, well designed, well thought out or, if the rental car I drove in America this year is anything to go by, especially well made either. Perhaps this is why the boss of Chrysler chose to go to Washington in his private jet. He knew that if he used a Sebring, it would break down on the way. Or worse, it would get there and he’d be a laughing stock among his business-mates from Ford and General Motors.

Strangely, however, the Chrysler is not the worst car I drove all year. That accolade rests with the diesel-powered Kia Sedona people carrier.

With the Sebring, you get the impression that the designers and engineers couldn’t be bothered to make a good car. With the Sedona you are left with the distinct impression they simply didn’t know how.

I cannot conceive of how empty, pointless and lacking in ambition or style your life must be for the Sedona to be a solution. It is like alcohol-free beer, a pointless car-free facsimile of the real thing, and as a result, it can have no place in the life of a sentient being.

The biggest disappointment of the year is a closely fought contest between any number of cars but the winner is Audi’s RS 6. It promises much and on a racetrack it delivers a great deal. But to buy a five-seat estate car simply because it’s so fluent through Becketts is like going out to buy a pet goldfish and coming home with a horse “because it’s so good over the Chair”.

The drawbacks you will encounter in real life are too endless. The uncomfortable seating, the weird steering and a very real sense that in a car like this, 572bhp is a lot more than you will ever need. It’s said you can’t be too beautiful or too rich but you can have too much power. Because one minute you’ll be overtaking a lorry and the next you’ll go mad and want to invade Poland.

Other disappointments are mostly centred on cars which aren’t really as good as others that do broadly the same thing. The Ford Kuga, for instance, is not as good as the Volvo XC60 and the Renault Twingo Renaultsport is not as good as a Fiat 500 Abarth. And then there’s the Vauxhall Insignia, which is massively better than the Vectra it replaces. But not quite as good as the Ford Mondeo. And who says: “Right. What I want to buy is the second-best four-door saloon with no badge prestige”? Actually, come to think of it; who wants to buy the best?

My main gripe of the year, though, rests with seat designers who have got it into their heads that we only like leather – there’s really nothing wrong with pleblon, especially on a day that’s hot or cold, and doubly especially if there are any corners between your house and your place of work.

Worse, though, they seem to think that what we really want are seats in our cars that are less comfortable than those in our kitchens. I know that cod liver oil is good for you. I also know you will go to heaven if you only eat weeds and you spend your evenings embroidering kneelers for the local church. But we are not all vegi-vicars. That is why we don’t wear hair shirts and it’s why we want the seats in our cars to have a bit of give. Are you listening, Vauxhall? Are you listening, Ford? Go and find yourself an old Renault Fuego Turbo. Check out the bean bags it came with and you’ll know what I’m on about.

And now we shall move on to the good stuff from the past 12 months. On television recently, I said the best car from the year was the Caterham R500 but it’s important to remember that the criterion we were looking for was very specific. The winner had to do more than you could reasonably expect for the money.

The Nissan GT-R was a contender because it costs almost half as much as a Porsche 911 Turbo and yet around the Nürburgring – and such things do matter with cars like this – it is faster. Then you have the VW Scirocco, which costs, as near as makes no difference, the same as the Golf GTI on which it is based. And yet it’s so much more desirable. But the winner had to be the little Caterham, which is faster round the Top Gear track than the Bugatti Veyron . . . even though it costs about 30 times less.

However, if you broaden the search engine and look simply for the best car of the year, the Caterham isn’t in with a shout because it’s ugly and geeky and I wouldn’t have one even if the option was the loss of my right ********.

Best car, then? Hmmm. You cannot discount the Rolls-Royce Phantom drophead because it is exquisite in almost every way. Nor can we ignore the Fiat 500 Abarth because it’s just so bouncy and wonderful and so full of enthusiasm. I don’t think it would be possible to be in a bad mood while driving this car. And soon there will be a 200bhp version with a spoiler the size of Middlesex on the roof. That’ll make the Mini Cooper look like a brogue.

However, the car I’ve selected wins because it’s just such a surprise.

Over the years there have been a great many Corvettes, and none of them, if we’re honest, have been any good. Oh, there have been some fast ones and some with great charisma. Mostly, they have been pretty as well. But to drive? No. They were the automotive equivalent of Big Macs. Cheap, plastic and at the right time, and in the right place, sort of just what you want. But like I said. Just no.

And then out of nowhere came the ZR1, which has a supercharged V8 that manages to be both docile and extraordinarily savage all at the same time. I’ve been trying to think of a dog that pulls off a similar trick, but there isn’t one. And anyway, this car is not a dog.

Oh, it’s not built very well. After just three days in my care, the boot lock disintegrated and the keyless go system refused to acknowledge the keys were in the car, but I didn’t mind because there is simply no other car that looks this good, goes this fast – in a straight line and around corners – and that most of the time bumbles about like a forgetful uncle. And when you throw in the price tag of just £106,690 – lots for a Corvette but modest next to a similarly powerful Ferrari – the case for the defence can sit down and put up its feet knowing that the prosecutor simply has nowhere to go.

It is an epic car and I’m only sad that unless the healthcare and pensions company that makes it can be turned around, it will be the last of the breed.

Indeed, I worry that the next 12 months will bring us many wrecks, many drownings and absolutely nothing to laugh at at all. I shall therefore stop short of wishing you a prosperous new year. Instead, I shall hope that in our new-found poverty, we can still all be happy.

Chevrolet Corvette ZR1

Engine: 6162cc, supercharged V8
Power: 638bhp @ 6500rpm
Torque: 604 lb ft @ 3800rpm
Transmission: Six-speed manual
Fuel: 18.8mpg (combined) 355g/km CO2
Acceleration: 0-60mph: 3.4sec
Top speed: 205mph
Price: £106,690
Road tax band: G (£400 a year)
Release date: Out now

Clarkson’s Verdict:
FIVE STARS
It’s a lean, mean muscle machine
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/dri...ffset=0&page=1
Gojirra99 is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 09:35 AM
  #2  
BLK98GS3
Lead Lap
 
BLK98GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can see why....probably wouldn't have been my pick though.
BLK98GS3 is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 10:24 AM
  #3  
jwong77
Pole Position
 
jwong77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 2,299
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Wow, for him to have picked an american car, hell must be frozen over.
jwong77 is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 11:22 AM
  #4  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,770
Received 2,127 Likes on 1,379 Posts
Default

he loved his ford GT too but then i think it had problems...

as much as he makes fun of the u.s., he obviously has a secret love for muscle cars.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 11:40 AM
  #5  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,207
Received 3,849 Likes on 2,334 Posts
Default

I recently drove a C6 Z06. I can get what he's talking about.
lobuxracer is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 04:05 PM
  #6  
whoster
Lexus Test Driver
 
whoster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Inside
Posts: 5,350
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
he loved his ford GT too but then i think it had problems...

as much as he makes fun of the u.s., he obviously has a secret love for muscle cars.
the sad thing about his GT was that all the problems came from an immobilizer alarm system installed by Ford UK IN the UK after it arrived perfectly fine from the factory here in the States.
whoster is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 04:25 PM
  #7  
speedflex
Lexus Champion
 
speedflex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: MO
Posts: 2,545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The ZR1 is a no excuses, world-class sports car. I never would have thought ol' Jeremy would love it so much but there it is.

If only they could give it the interior it deserves. Get the Cadillac guys to design a proper interior for this great car.
speedflex is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 07:10 PM
  #8  
I8ABMR
Lexus Fanatic
 
I8ABMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Waiting for next track day
Posts: 22,609
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

ZR1 is an amazing beast, but the formula is pretty much the same. Huge blown motor. The GTR offers much more advanced technology in terms of traction and advanced foot work. Wait for the GTR spec V to be released. The ZR1 has a huge power advantage over the GTR but doesnt beat the standard GTR by what you would expect from a 158 hp advantage and an almost equal advantage in torque.


ps the guy works for the LA times. I think I trust my opinion in car of the year as well as the other half dozen huge auto publications that have awarded Godzilla the number spot and car of the year.

Last edited by I8ABMR; 12-29-08 at 07:14 PM.
I8ABMR is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 08:00 PM
  #9  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,585
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jwong77
Wow, for him to have picked an american car, hell must be frozen over.
He probably looked at the ZR-1's price tag, independent of dealer mark-ups/price gouging, and compared it to that of Porsches and Ferraris costing twice as much and not offering significantly any more performance.....even less in some cases. The Corvette's build quality, of course, also significantly exceeds that of its equally fierce Dodge Viper competitor, which, to put it bluntly, is, quality-wise, a piece of junk.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 08:25 PM
  #10  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Great work Clarkson!!!!!!!!!!
 
Old 12-29-08, 08:39 PM
  #11  
I8ABMR
Lexus Fanatic
 
I8ABMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Waiting for next track day
Posts: 22,609
Received 100 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
He probably looked at the ZR-1's price tag, independent of dealer mark-ups/price gouging, and compared it to that of Porsches and Ferraris costing twice as much and not offering significantly any more performance.....even less in some cases. The Corvette's build quality, of course, also significantly exceeds that of its equally fierce Dodge Viper competitor, which, to put it bluntly, is, quality-wise, a piece of junk.
the ferraris and porsches have far better interior quality than the vette, but I am not sure if that warrants a 150k increase in price
I8ABMR is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 06:20 AM
  #12  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,585
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by I8ABMR
the ferraris and porsches have far better interior quality than the vette, but I am not sure if that warrants a 150k increase in price

Well, true to some extent, but Ferraris, like Dodge Vipers, are notorious for being in the shop more than out. Corvettes are not the most reliable cars on the road by any means, but, at least, they are (usually) reasonably reliable from one day to the next.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 07:30 AM
  #13  
Ice350
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Ice350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 11,349
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

It's nice to hear CLarkson give props to an American anything. I have always beena Vette fan and wish I could own one. People kept telling me I could fit in a C6 model but I tried and it's still too tight for me. The ZR1 is probably worth a little tightness, though.
Are they still using pushrod engines in those things? Well, it works.
Ice350 is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 07:42 AM
  #14  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,585
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ice350
Are they still using pushrod engines in those things? Well, it works.
That's because pushrod engines, while somewhat unrefined, produce a lot of torque at low RPM's, which is what a lot of Corvette (and American) drivers want.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 08:45 AM
  #15  
Yay-Z
Lead Lap
 
Yay-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, its his opinion, Just looking at the interior of the car, I already know I cant agree with his assessment.
Yay-Z is offline  


Quick Reply: Jeremy Clarkson's Car of the Year: CORVETTE ZR1



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:31 AM.