AutoPacific 2007 Vehicle Satisfaction Awards
#1
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
AutoPacific 2007 Vehicle Satisfaction Awards
Code:
Top 2007 model year performers are: BRAND: Infiniti PASSENGER CARS: Premium Luxury Car Lexus LS/BMW 7-Series Aspirational Luxury Car Jaguar X-Type Large Luxury Car Cadillac DTS Large Car Hyundai Azera/Toyota Avalon Luxury Mid-Size Car Nissan Maxima Premium Mid-Size Car Nissan Altima Mid-Size Car Saturn Aura Image Compact Car Audi A3 Compact Car Pontiac G5 Economy Car Honda Fit Premium Sports Car Lexus SC Sports Car Porsche Boxster Sporty Car Scion tC LIGHT TRUCKS: Large Light-Duty Pickup Chevrolet Silverado Large Heavy-Duty Pickup Chevrolet Silverado HD Compact Pickup Ford Explorer Sport Trac Luxury Sport Utility Lincoln Navigator Large Sport Utility GMC Yukon XL Mid-Size Sport Utility Toyota 4Runner Compact SUV/Off-Road Vehicle Toyota FJ Cruiser Luxury Crossover SUV Lincoln MKX Premium Mid-Size Crossover SUV Ford Edge/Hyundai Santa Fe Mid-Size Crossover SUV Honda CR-V Compact Crossover SUV Hyundai Tucson Minivan Nissan Quest
AutoPacific cites Ford in strong showing.
by Paul A. Eisenstein (2007-06-10)
Problem-plagued Ford Motor Co. has gotten another critical endorsement, this one from the 2007 Vehicle Satisfaction Awards, an annual measure of quality and customer service.
The automaker's Lincoln luxury brand narrowly lost a four-way shoot-out, slipping into second, just behind Nissan's highline Infiniti brand, announced the market research firm, AutoPacific, Inc. Meanwhile, Lincoln 's new MKX crossover was named top-ranked truck, while the Ford division's new Edge crossover was best in its category.
Ford's strong showing underscored the findings of another recent quality report, the widely published Initial Quality Survey, from J.D. Power and Associates, where Lincoln shot to third place, while the sibling Mercury division ranked eighth, and the Ford division came in tenth.
But there were other, notable differences between Power's IQS and AutoPacific's VSA. For one thing, while General Motors' flagship Cadillac division plunged in Power's rankings, from seventh to 25th place, it tied Lincoln in the VSA. The big surprise was Infiniti's sudden climb up the quality ladder, according to the VSA, while it was only ninth in the IQS.
Both surveys agreed that Toyota 's own luxury division, Lexus, is no longer the absolute quality benchmark, slipping to second, according to Power, and fourth in the AutoPacific poll. But the gap between first and fourth was minimal, Infiniti scoring 679 points, Lexus 676. The industry average was 632.
Judging the differences
How can two owner polls show such sharp differences? It depends on how one measures the word, "quality." Power's better known study focuses on the number of complaints reported by a survey sample of 97,000 2007 model-year vehicle owners - what is often called a "Things-Gone-Wrong" survey. The VSA also looks for those "Things-Gone-Right," which reveal the ways in which manufacturers, like Ford or Infiniti, satisfy their owners.
"Often times, the most satisfying vehicle is the one with the most personality, not the one that is screwed together the best," noted George Peterson, president of AutoPacific, in an overview of the 2007 VSA.
Satisfaction can be improved, in fact, by the way a brand handle the repair of a defect. And that can provide a significant advantage in a study like this when a carmaker is introducing all-new vehicles. As the Power IQS underscored, all-new models tend to have more early quality problems than products that have been on the market for several years. But the VSA reveals that twelve of the most satisfying top 28 vehicles - which won or tied in 25 separate categories - are all new for 2007.
Of those, 13 top cars wear Big Three badges, with seven Asian and three European car segment winners. In the 15 truck categories, seven are Detroit nameplates, with eight Japanese and Korean makes. Notably, DaimlerChrysler took no best-in-category award, while GM and Ford tied with six class leaders each. Ford took four, Hyundai and Nissan three apiece, and Honda grabbed two.
Emphasizing the fact that the VSA rewards brands that aren't always the best in pure quality metrics, Land Rover landed in 15th place, just above industry average. The British marque has traditionally been at the bottom of Power's IQS, this year suffering about 50 percent more reported problems than the industry average. HUMMER, which took seventh in the VSA, and Volkswagen, which AutoPacific ranked 11th, also fared far more poorly in Power's Things-Gone-Wrong count.
As one might expect, luxury car owners tended to be most satisfied with their vehicles, the average vehicle in the Premium Luxury Car segment scoring 678 points. (The BMW 7-Series and Lexus LS tied for first.) But Large Sport Utility competitors scored nearly as high, an average 675 points. (The winner the GMC Yukon XL.)
At the bottom of the rung were Compact SUVs, at 593 points and Economy Cars, at 566.
The 2007 VSA comprises the results of 24,000 U.S. new vehicle owners, who were asked about their experience after roughly 60 to 90 days of ownership.
by Paul A. Eisenstein (2007-06-10)
Problem-plagued Ford Motor Co. has gotten another critical endorsement, this one from the 2007 Vehicle Satisfaction Awards, an annual measure of quality and customer service.
The automaker's Lincoln luxury brand narrowly lost a four-way shoot-out, slipping into second, just behind Nissan's highline Infiniti brand, announced the market research firm, AutoPacific, Inc. Meanwhile, Lincoln 's new MKX crossover was named top-ranked truck, while the Ford division's new Edge crossover was best in its category.
Ford's strong showing underscored the findings of another recent quality report, the widely published Initial Quality Survey, from J.D. Power and Associates, where Lincoln shot to third place, while the sibling Mercury division ranked eighth, and the Ford division came in tenth.
But there were other, notable differences between Power's IQS and AutoPacific's VSA. For one thing, while General Motors' flagship Cadillac division plunged in Power's rankings, from seventh to 25th place, it tied Lincoln in the VSA. The big surprise was Infiniti's sudden climb up the quality ladder, according to the VSA, while it was only ninth in the IQS.
Both surveys agreed that Toyota 's own luxury division, Lexus, is no longer the absolute quality benchmark, slipping to second, according to Power, and fourth in the AutoPacific poll. But the gap between first and fourth was minimal, Infiniti scoring 679 points, Lexus 676. The industry average was 632.
Judging the differences
How can two owner polls show such sharp differences? It depends on how one measures the word, "quality." Power's better known study focuses on the number of complaints reported by a survey sample of 97,000 2007 model-year vehicle owners - what is often called a "Things-Gone-Wrong" survey. The VSA also looks for those "Things-Gone-Right," which reveal the ways in which manufacturers, like Ford or Infiniti, satisfy their owners.
"Often times, the most satisfying vehicle is the one with the most personality, not the one that is screwed together the best," noted George Peterson, president of AutoPacific, in an overview of the 2007 VSA.
Satisfaction can be improved, in fact, by the way a brand handle the repair of a defect. And that can provide a significant advantage in a study like this when a carmaker is introducing all-new vehicles. As the Power IQS underscored, all-new models tend to have more early quality problems than products that have been on the market for several years. But the VSA reveals that twelve of the most satisfying top 28 vehicles - which won or tied in 25 separate categories - are all new for 2007.
Of those, 13 top cars wear Big Three badges, with seven Asian and three European car segment winners. In the 15 truck categories, seven are Detroit nameplates, with eight Japanese and Korean makes. Notably, DaimlerChrysler took no best-in-category award, while GM and Ford tied with six class leaders each. Ford took four, Hyundai and Nissan three apiece, and Honda grabbed two.
Emphasizing the fact that the VSA rewards brands that aren't always the best in pure quality metrics, Land Rover landed in 15th place, just above industry average. The British marque has traditionally been at the bottom of Power's IQS, this year suffering about 50 percent more reported problems than the industry average. HUMMER, which took seventh in the VSA, and Volkswagen, which AutoPacific ranked 11th, also fared far more poorly in Power's Things-Gone-Wrong count.
As one might expect, luxury car owners tended to be most satisfied with their vehicles, the average vehicle in the Premium Luxury Car segment scoring 678 points. (The BMW 7-Series and Lexus LS tied for first.) But Large Sport Utility competitors scored nearly as high, an average 675 points. (The winner the GMC Yukon XL.)
At the bottom of the rung were Compact SUVs, at 593 points and Economy Cars, at 566.
The 2007 VSA comprises the results of 24,000 U.S. new vehicle owners, who were asked about their experience after roughly 60 to 90 days of ownership.
.
Last edited by Gojirra99; 06-12-07 at 07:50 AM.
#2
The Altima is a "premium midsize car", and the Saturn Aura isn't?
I guess none of these useless (my opinion) surveys will come out without some/all of its data leaving people scratching their heads.
I guess none of these useless (my opinion) surveys will come out without some/all of its data leaving people scratching their heads.
#5
Lexus Fanatic
Ridiculous categories aside, the fact that Lexus slips to the 4th is quite alarming. Hopefully Lexus will work harder in improving this aspect which they've been known for.
#6
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
#7
Lexus Fanatic
Trending Topics
#8
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Not saying Lexus shouldn't try hard to keep their quality/reliability at the top of the industry though . . .
#9
Lexus Fanatic
Not really, since this survey ask questions on emotional appeal, personality, etc., so it's not a purely "quality" survey, I don't think Lexus was ever #1 in their past surveys ?
Not saying Lexus shouldn't try hard to keep their quality/reliability at the top of the industry though . . .
Not saying Lexus shouldn't try hard to keep their quality/reliability at the top of the industry though . . .
#10
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
isnt this more important?
J.D. Power and Associates 2007 Initial Quality Study
June 6, 2007
Defects or design complaints after 3 months of ownership
Nameplate rankings
Brand Problems per 100 vehicles
Porsche 91
Lexus 94
Lincoln 100
Honda 108
Mercedes-Benz 111
Jaguar 112
Toyota 112
Mercury 113
Infiniti 117
Ford 120
Scion 123
Hyundai 125
Kia 125
Industry Average 125
Buick 127
Chevrolet 129
Volvo 129
Acura 130
GMC 131
Nissan 132
Saturn 132
BMW 133
Pontiac 133
Saab 133
Subaru 133
Cadillac 135
Audi 136
Chrysler 151
Suzuki 153
Mitsubishi 155
Dodge 156
Volkswagen 160
Jeep 161
Hummer 162
Mazda 163
Land Rover 170
J.D. Power and Associates 2007 Initial Quality Study
June 6, 2007
Defects or design complaints after 3 months of ownership
Nameplate rankings
Brand Problems per 100 vehicles
Porsche 91
Lexus 94
Lincoln 100
Honda 108
Mercedes-Benz 111
Jaguar 112
Toyota 112
Mercury 113
Infiniti 117
Ford 120
Scion 123
Hyundai 125
Kia 125
Industry Average 125
Buick 127
Chevrolet 129
Volvo 129
Acura 130
GMC 131
Nissan 132
Saturn 132
BMW 133
Pontiac 133
Saab 133
Subaru 133
Cadillac 135
Audi 136
Chrysler 151
Suzuki 153
Mitsubishi 155
Dodge 156
Volkswagen 160
Jeep 161
Hummer 162
Mazda 163
Land Rover 170
#11
isnt this more important?
J.D. Power and Associates 2007 Initial Quality Study
June 6, 2007
Defects or design complaints after 3 months of ownership
Nameplate rankings
Brand Problems per 100 vehicles
Porsche 91
Lexus 94
Lincoln 100
Honda 108
Mercedes-Benz 111
Jaguar 112
Toyota 112
Mercury 113
Infiniti 117
Ford 120
Scion 123
Hyundai 125
Kia 125
Industry Average 125
Buick 127
Chevrolet 129
Volvo 129
Acura 130
GMC 131
Nissan 132
Saturn 132
BMW 133
Pontiac 133
Saab 133
Subaru 133
Cadillac 135
Audi 136
Chrysler 151
Suzuki 153
Mitsubishi 155
Dodge 156
Volkswagen 160
Jeep 161
Hummer 162
Mazda 163
Land Rover 170
J.D. Power and Associates 2007 Initial Quality Study
June 6, 2007
Defects or design complaints after 3 months of ownership
Nameplate rankings
Brand Problems per 100 vehicles
Porsche 91
Lexus 94
Lincoln 100
Honda 108
Mercedes-Benz 111
Jaguar 112
Toyota 112
Mercury 113
Infiniti 117
Ford 120
Scion 123
Hyundai 125
Kia 125
Industry Average 125
Buick 127
Chevrolet 129
Volvo 129
Acura 130
GMC 131
Nissan 132
Saturn 132
BMW 133
Pontiac 133
Saab 133
Subaru 133
Cadillac 135
Audi 136
Chrysler 151
Suzuki 153
Mitsubishi 155
Dodge 156
Volkswagen 160
Jeep 161
Hummer 162
Mazda 163
Land Rover 170
#12
Lexus Fanatic
The 4th-place showing is significant for other reasons too. It is not just a reflection of Lexus slipping but of other competing manufacturers catching up. Audi has recently shown marked improvement in the quality of its vehicles and ownership satisfaction (the superb DSG transmission sure hasn't hurt). Mercedes, known the last 10 years or so for very poor reliability, is now finally starting to show some signs of improvement, especially with the new S-Class...though the company as a whole is still, overall, in last place in the latest Consumer Reports' reliability surveys.
#13
Lexus Champion
The new ES, IMO, has been very disappointing. (see my review). I've posted and written extensively about this.....seems like my opinion is not alone either.
The 4th-place showing is significant for other reasons too. It is not just a reflection of Lexus slipping but of other competing manufacturers catching up. Audi has recently shown marked improvement in the quality of its vehicles and ownership satisfaction (the superb DSG transmission sure hasn't hurt). Mercedes, known the last 10 years or so for very poor reliability, is now finally starting to show some signs of improvement, especially with the new S-Class...though the company as a whole is still, overall, in last place in the latest Consumer Reports' reliability surveys.
The 4th-place showing is significant for other reasons too. It is not just a reflection of Lexus slipping but of other competing manufacturers catching up. Audi has recently shown marked improvement in the quality of its vehicles and ownership satisfaction (the superb DSG transmission sure hasn't hurt). Mercedes, known the last 10 years or so for very poor reliability, is now finally starting to show some signs of improvement, especially with the new S-Class...though the company as a whole is still, overall, in last place in the latest Consumer Reports' reliability surveys.
#14
Moderator
iTrader: (6)
Brand Problems per 100 vehicles
Porsche 91
Lexus 94
Lincoln 100
Honda 108
Mercedes-Benz 111
Jaguar 112
Toyota 112
Mercury 113
Infiniti 117
Ford 120
Scion 123
Hyundai 125
Kia 125
Industry Average 125
Buick 127
Chevrolet 129
Volvo 129
Acura 130
GMC 131
Nissan 132
Saturn 132
BMW 133
Pontiac 133
Saab 133
Subaru 133
Cadillac 135
Audi 136
Chrysler 151
Suzuki 153
Mitsubishi 155
Dodge 156
Volkswagen 160
Jeep 161
Hummer 162
Mazda 163
Land Rover 170
#15
I'm book-marking this post the next time a JD powers survey comes out showing Toyota/Lexus back on top.