mmarshall

Here is AOL's review of the LS460 ( from CAR CONNECTION ).
I have not reviewed this car myself yet but plan to....it is on my list.

http://autos.aol.com/article/luxury/...29163009990001

-J-P-L-

Finally, someone who isn't a Lexus hater reviewing the new LS.
Very good write up.
The thing with the new LS is that there's actually TOO MUCH to write about(not a bad thing). It would take a book to get through the features.

marshmallo

AWD early 2007! That's a lot earlier than I expected.

The more I look at the package the more I like. The only
caveat is that there are some colors that make the car look
bleh... Dark colors seem to rule the day with L-finesse.

doug_999

Who were the "Lexus haters" that reviewed it and what makes them "Lexus haters"?

PhilipMSPT

iTrader: (5)

Any critic that subjectively negates the LS, because they can find nothing objective to criticize...

doug_999

Ok that's the what, now we need the who

-J-P-L-

Remember that massive thread we just had on Dan Neil's review of the LS. If that isn't a biased hater, then I don't know what is.

Mr Johnson

So then just change it to:

"what the hell does AOL know about cars"
"Obviously the guy is a Lexus owner"
"That reviewer has no credentials... and I'M gonna tell him that!"

Only now it's for the anti-LS crowd.

Sorry, but I don't really give a flying hoot about what AOL, Money Magazine, Consumers Union or the Robb Report have to say about the car. There are a couple of magazines, and I'd go so far as to say writers at specific magazines, that I look to for their input on vehicles. I then balance that with what I think I know as their biases from following them for many years (Think Ebert and Roeper and who you agree with and why). Then I drive the car myself and draw my own conclusions.

Can't wait to drive it myself.