Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Misubishi: new products must be hits to stay in the U.S.

Old 06-01-06, 07:23 AM
  #1  
GFerg
Speaks French in Russian

Thread Starter
 
GFerg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: What is G?
Posts: 13,246
Received 55 Likes on 43 Posts
Default Misubishi: new products must be hits to stay in the U.S.

Hoping for a Hit
New products need to be hits for Mitsubishi to stay in U.S. market

By KATHY JACKSON | AUTOMOTIVE NEWS
AutoWeek | Published 05/30/06, 12:58 pm et



NAGOYA, Japan -- Maybe it was a surprising bit of candor. Maybe it was an attempt to light a fire under the sales staff. But at face value, it was a stunning statement:

If a new crop of redesigned models doesn't sell, Mitsubishi may pull out of the United States.

At a press event here last week, the parent company's top product development executive said the stakes for the redesigned Outlander, Lancer and other vehicles are enormous. The vehicles have "to be successful for us to stay in business in the U.S.," said Shinichi Kurihara.

The first of the vehicles, the redesigned Outlander, goes on sale this fall. They will be built on the company's new C platform, the first developed by Mitsubishi since its 2004 breakup with DaimlerChrysler.

Kurihara's words underscore Mitsubishi's precarious position in the United States.

Last year sales plunged to 123,995 units, down from 345,111 in 2002. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. has posted huge losses in recent years, and it must make every product-development dollar count.

Mitsubishi's assembly plant in Normal, Ill., operates on only one shift. That's a recipe for losing money.

Knows the market
Kurihara, 56, knows the United States well. From 1984 to 1988 he worked at Mitsubishi's U.S. headquarters in Cypress, Calif., studying U.S. consumer habits.

From 1996 to 2001 he was senior vice president of product strategy in the United States and was planning chief for the redesigned 2007 Eclipse Spyder that went on sale this spring.

He was in charge of the global compact segment before being named to his current job on April 1. He is corporate general manager of the product strategy office.

Kurihara's role is to assist U.S. CEO Hiroshi Harunari in bringing the proper product to this country.

"The U.S. is so important," Kurihara says. "We need to support Harunari. We believe Outlander will help us establish our image. We hope Outlander will bring new customers to our dealerships."

Sales fall 16.5%
Kurihara admits Mitsubishi's U.S. lineup is performing poorly. Through four months this year, sales fell 16.5 percent to 36,536 units.

"When we decided on Endeavor and Galant, we thought Mitsubishi was more upscale," he says. "But now maybe that is not so important."

He dismisses the Raider pickup as a "bad decision." The Eclipse is performing well, outselling the Endeavor and Lancer.

Mitsubishi sold 2,626 Eclipses in April in the United States, compared with 988 in the same period a year earlier.

He says the C-platform vehicles will demand attention with sporty good looks and innovative equipment.

The Outlander crossover has seven seats and more engine power than the current five-seat Outlander. It is powered by a six-speed automatic transmission, Mitsubishi's first, and a new 3.0-liter V-6 making 220 hp. It replaces a 2.4-liter, 160-hp four-cylinder engine.

Both all-wheel-drive and front-wheel-drive powertrains are available. An aluminum roof panel helps lower the center of gravity.

It will be the first Mitsubishi sold in the United States with a touch-screen navigation system. Bluetooth wireless technology, paddle shifters and in-floor third-row stowable seats also are available.

"Globally, Mitsubishi has enjoyed a strong reputation as an SUV manufacturer," says Kurihara. "We hope to re-establish our SUV image in the U.S."

Mitsubishi wants to sell at least 4,000 Outlanders monthly in the United States. It sold 811 Outlanders in April.

Dealers want more ads
Mitsubishi in Japan says it plans to raise its U.S. incentive spending by 10 percent in the fiscal year that began April 1. The company will spend $3,000 per vehicle, up from $2,700 per vehicle in the fiscal year that ended March 31.

Miami dealer Bill Seidle says good product alone won't do it. He says Mitsubishi needs to open its purse and advertise.

"We have some of the finest automobiles in the U.S., such as the Eclipse and Eclipse Spyder, but nobody knows about them," Seidle says.

"I don't think they have enough funds to spend in the U.S. As a franchise, we're not moving and shaking."
http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl...1/TOC01ARCHIVE
GFerg is offline  
Old 06-01-06, 07:37 AM
  #2  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,514
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Me and Mike (1SICKLEX ) have gone back and forth several times over who was going to be the next manufacturer selling here to pull out of the U.S. market.....Isuzu or Mitsubishi. It's still hard to say...although Mitsubishi obviously carries a far wider range of vehicles here than Isuzu does. Isuzu only sells two rebadged Chevy / GM vehicles here ( neither one of them an Isuzu design ) .....the Ascender SUV and the I280 / I350 pickup.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-01-06, 08:17 AM
  #3  
CVsIS250
Lexus Test Driver
 
CVsIS250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Mitsubushi=FAILURE because they steal everyone's idea about 3 years too late. Can you say, "Highlander?" Bout time they drop out. Their SUV Montero Sport is a NIHS death trap.

CV
CVsIS250 is offline  
Old 06-01-06, 08:27 AM
  #4  
Lexmex
Super Moderator
 
Lexmex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 17,238
Received 159 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

It's rather sad to see that statement.

Mitsubishi just a few years ago opened its doors not only down here in Mexico, but also up in Canada. I see plenty of Outlanders on the street, but hardly any other vehicle. My track friends tell me the Eclipse is just way too underpowered (I agree having tested it), though beautiful. And friends who were going to get an EVO are looking elsewhere (they heard of clutch wear problems with that combo of AWD/Turbo).
Lexmex is offline  
Old 06-01-06, 08:30 AM
  #5  
Trexus
Moderator
 
Trexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: California
Posts: 4,317
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

All I can say to Mitsubishi is good luck. Mitsubishi may have a wider model range than Isuzu which means they have a greater risk, they have more to lose than Isuzu. It appears that Mitsubushi will be the first to pull out of the U.S. if sales don't pick up for their new models. We are witnessing history in the making...

Last edited by Trexus; 06-01-06 at 10:39 AM.
Trexus is offline  
Old 06-01-06, 09:21 AM
  #6  
GS3Tek
Moderator
iTrader: (8)
 
GS3Tek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: so cal
Posts: 12,358
Received 162 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CVsGX470
Mitsubushi=FAILURE because they steal everyone's idea about 3 years too late. Can you say, "Highlander?" Bout time they drop out. Their SUV Montero Sport is a NIHS death trap.

CV
I totally agree. The only mitsubishi that I liked was the 3000gt vr4.
Is the eclipse the only car that's keeping mitusbishi alive?

Regarding Isuzu......there's more marketing for suzuki than isuzu
GS3Tek is offline  
Old 06-01-06, 01:03 PM
  #7  
tqlla3k
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
tqlla3k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I hope that Mitsubishi survives as well. All their cars(other than the EVO) have been lacking since 1999. I liked all their cars back then, in fact I had a 199 Eclipse, as well as my rebodied 94 3000GT. The Diamante was a slick looking sedan, the galant wasnt bad.

Sadly, times have changed.....

The Galant looks horrific. Just trash it and start over. What a terrible looking vehicle. It definately needs a complete redesign. They should make aluminum Wheels standard on this car, and lower it all the way around. Its WAY too high, and the front is higher than the back, another no no. Hood and front look terrible.... just nothing about it looks good.

The Eclipse needs to go back to its roots. Its a bloated giant V6. Its over accentuated accets look gawdy, its just not an appealing vehicle. They should use the RX-8 and G35 as inspirations. Projector headlights are a must... and again the car is too lifted. It must lose girth and weight.

The Lancer needs some serious work. Mitsubishi should canabalize the EVO, and make the standard lancer look a lot more like the EVO. Sure it will hurt EVO sales, but it will help the Lancer... a lot. The car again, is way too lifted. Maybe they could have some special edition which looks a lot like the EVO. without the awesome motor and tranny.

I havent looked on the inside of any of these cars, but if the EVO VIII was any indication, all the mitsu's need some quality in the interior.

The new outlander isnt bad.
The New EVO is great

Last edited by tqlla3k; 06-01-06 at 01:07 PM.
tqlla3k is offline  
Old 06-01-06, 01:10 PM
  #8  
tqlla3k
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
tqlla3k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If Mitsu had something that looked like the RX-8 with the performance of the Evolution, that would be a HOT selling car.
tqlla3k is offline  
Old 06-01-06, 01:10 PM
  #9  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Me and Mike (1SICKLEX ) have gone back and forth several times over who was going to be the next manufacturer selling here to pull out of the U.S. market.....Isuzu or Mitsubishi. It's still hard to say...although Mitsubishi obviously carries a far wider range of vehicles here than Isuzu does. Isuzu only sells two rebadged Chevy / GM vehicles here ( neither one of them an Isuzu design ) .....the Ascender SUV and the I280 / I350 pickup.

Yes we have sir. I say thery are gone. Isuzu has GM support and they love making dumb decisons. Mitsu will be gone
 
Old 06-01-06, 01:20 PM
  #10  
Trexus
Moderator
 
Trexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: California
Posts: 4,317
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

And don't forget Isuzu's latest model coming. This will save them...


https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...5&page=1&pp=15
Trexus is offline  
Old 06-01-06, 01:32 PM
  #11  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,514
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tqlla3k
If Mitsu had something that looked like the RX-8 with the performance of the Evolution, that would be a HOT selling car.
Well...the Eclipse V6 has 263 HP, not much less than the Evo itself...and that 263 HP is not burdened by the extra weight and drag of the Evo's AWD, though admittedly the Eclipse's FWD layout, unlike the Evo, is prone to some understeer. And the Eclipse's styling, except for the RX8's two mini-rear doors, is not all that different.

In fact, one of my neighbors, I think, is getting ready to buy a new Eclipse. She has fallen in love with the car, even after asking me for help, and over my cautions that they have been unreliable.

Last edited by mmarshall; 06-01-06 at 01:35 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-01-06, 01:36 PM
  #12  
GFerg
Speaks French in Russian

Thread Starter
 
GFerg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: What is G?
Posts: 13,246
Received 55 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Well they do have this....



and this coming.



I wouldn't count them out just yet. They do have some interesting products on the way. But if these two models for some reason fail, then peace out.

The current Mitsu line-up is still incredibly weak.
GFerg is offline  
Old 06-01-06, 01:58 PM
  #13  
tqlla3k
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
tqlla3k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Well...the Eclipse V6 has 263 HP, not much less than the Evo itself...and that 263 HP is not burdened by the extra weight and drag of the Evo's AWD, though admittedly the Eclipse's FWD layout, unlike the Evo, is prone to some understeer. And the Eclipse's styling, except for the RX8's two mini-rear doors, is not all that different.

In fact, one of my neighbors, I think, is getting ready to buy a new Eclipse. She has fallen in love with the car, even after asking me for help, and over my cautions that they have been unreliable.
The Eclipse is 3538lbs, the EVO is 3274lbs for the standard EVO. Pretty big difference. The EVO will beat my IS350 in almost any situation possible. The same cannot be said of the Eclipse.

The new Eclipse doesnt look like the RX-8.
tqlla3k is offline  
Old 06-01-06, 02:07 PM
  #14  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,514
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tqlla3k
The Eclipse is 3538lbs, the EVO is 3274lbs for the standard EVO. Pretty big difference. The EVO will beat my IS350 in almost any situation possible. The same cannot be said of the Eclipse.

The new Eclipse doesnt look like the RX-8.
No, of course the Eclipse and the RX-8 have somewhat different styling, but what I meant is that they have the same general body outline.....a low slung sports coupe.

I agree that the Eclipse falls short of the Evo's performance, but the difference is not all that great in a straight line....especially if the Eclipse has a manual transmission. The biggest difference will be in the Eclipse's understeer....the Evo, on a twisting road, will run circles around it.
Both cars, however, ( as with your IS350 as well ) have more than enough performance unless you want to drive like a madman.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-01-06, 02:18 PM
  #15  
Goldark
Lexus Test Driver
 
Goldark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if they put the ralliart eclipse into production - i'd buy one
Goldark is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Misubishi: new products must be hits to stay in the U.S.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:20 PM.