Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Super-luxury showdown: Phantom vs. Maybach

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-06, 08:44 PM
  #1  
GFerg
Speaks French in Russian

Thread Starter
 
GFerg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: What is G?
Posts: 13,250
Received 58 Likes on 45 Posts
Default Super-luxury showdown: Phantom vs. Maybach

Rolls-Royce vs. Maybach
We test two top luxury cruisers to see which you'd want to buy. Almost as if you could afford it.

March 26, 2006; Posted: 2:52 p.m. EST (1952 GMT)
By Peter Valdes-Dapena, CNNMoney.com staff writer









MONTVALE, NJ (CNNMoney.com) - You may never have the opportunity to peel out and smoke the rear tires on a $350,000 Rolls Royce Phantom, but if you ever get the chance, here's how.

First, you open the center console. Inside, there are a lot of switches, one of which you can use to turn off the car's electronic traction control. Then you press a round silver button on the steering wheel, the button with the letter "L" on it. That sets the Phantom's six-speed transmission so that it will start in first gear rather than second.

Now stomp on it.

There it is! The back end drifting to the side, noise, the smell of burning rubber, the whole deal.

OK, that was fun. But it's a bit like belching in a cathedral so you can hear the echo, isn't it? Kind of funny but... please.

The Rolls-Royce Phantom does invite that sort of treatment, though, because it is an icon of tradition, wealth and prestige. And who doesn't want to mock that?

That very iconic status creates a marketing opportunity for Rolls-Royce's major competitor, DaimlerChrysler's Maybach. After all, not everyone with a morbidly large bank account wants to rub it in the faces of the plebes. The Maybach offers an understated alternative that lacks the well-known history, but also the baggage, of Rolls-Royce.

I recently had the opportunity to travel right into the middle of this polite but nasty little war. I spent several hours driving a top-notch example of each company's product. I took the wheel of a Rolls-Royce Phantom in the morning, then a Maybach 57S after lunch.

These are the sorts of difficult decisions that extremely wealthy people have to pay other people to make for them every day. I've been there and I feel for them.

Rolls-Royce Phantom

Rolls-Royce hasn't always made truly great cars. For long periods in its history, the company made merely expensive ones. Upon taking over the brand in 1998, BMW wanted to reach back -- quite far back, actually -- and make the sort of car that made Rolls-Royce famous.

It seems to me like they pretty much nailed it. The Phantom does that thing that a Rolls-Royce has to do. It's a unique skill and no other car even comes close. The term Rolls-Royce engineers have used since the 1930s is "waftability." You do not drive the Phantom. You control it and it carries you, as if gliding over the ground, around turns, in and out of traffic.

The most remarkable thing about the Phantom, in fact, is the complete lack of any excitement whatsoever in driving it. Short of the maneuver described above or, perhaps, hitting something with it, the Phantom produces no thrills.

Ordinarily, that would sound like a bad thing. But if one chooses to drive the Phantom, one is not looking for excitement. Any car, driven fast enough, can at least scare you. The Phantom soothes even at speed. The big car simply responds to your requests, entered through the appropriately wide and spindly steering wheel. Curvy roads can be taken at a chase scene pace and the big car handles it with aplomb.

Even when the gas pedal is mashed full to the floor, the Phantom never loses its cool. In fact, the Phantom hurries up rather nicely. Under its very long hood, there's a 6.75-liter V-12 engine that can provide 453 horsepower, should you ever wish it to.

In a car like this, that sort of power helps maintain the sense of calm inside the 5,500-pound vehicle's immense cabin. The engine is strong enough that it rarely needs to tax itself, thereby creating motor noises you might actually be able to hear.

There are a few features the Phantom lacks and which one might expect on a vehicle at this price. (Well, what doesn't one expect at this price?) There is no automatic climate control, for example. I had to fiddle with ***** for the fan and temperature.

Also, the car did not have dynamic cruise control, a system that uses radar to maintain an even following distance from cars ahead on the highway. Again, that feature is available on cars costing a fraction of the Phantom's price.

Gentlemen, please, what's up with that?

Maybach 57S

The last I spent any real time in a Maybach was at the 2003 New York Auto Show. The Maybach 62 was parked at the show and I borrowed its back seat to use as my office for a couple of hours. Each of that car's back seats cost $15,000 and I think I'd pay that much just to do that again. Those were some nice seats.

While the 57 is Maybach's shorter model, it's still a very big car. Back seat passengers can stretch their legs quite nicely. And there's that electric wine cooler and a pair of silver champagne flutes. And there are special cupholders to hold the champagne flutes.

Now, this is all very nice for the passenger, but the new 57S model adds something for the driver. For just $35,000 more than the regular Maybach 57 -- a total of about $370,000 -- the 57S provides significantly increased horsepower and adjustable sports suspension.

Its 6-liter turbocharged V-12 engine produces up to 604 horsepower. That's enough to take the three-ton car to 60 miles per hour in under five seconds.

Unlike the Phantom, the Maybach 57S offers no design allusions to a bygone era of luxury. The Phantom's dash evokes a 1930s sedan. Inside, the 57S has a kind of "art-techo" look with lots of carbon fiber trim, but the cockpit is all business. The steering wheel is thick and beefy. There are lots of switches and ***** in plain view.

There is no "waftability" in the 57S. You are driving this car and you know it. Through the steering wheel, road feel is not unpleasant, but it is distinct. Charging through some of the same sections of mountain road I'd plied earlier in the Phantom, the 57S offered a very different experience.

In all, the 57S's performance is striking for a vehicle that's almost 19 feet long. But this is still a car one would buy primarily for the benefit of one's passengers. The electric wine cooler and separate entertainment systems for the back seats do nothing to help performance. But if you want the whole enchilada with extra hot sauce, this is your car. (Frankly, if it were me, I'd get the regular 57 and save my performance driving time for my Ferrari.)

Ultimately, the Maybach's charms, its size, its performance, its seemingly endless list of amenities, are measurable on the same scales used to measure other vehicles. It has more of them and bigger and faster.

The Rolls-Royce Phantom, on the other hand, plays a different game. It offers something of its very own and it may not be your cup of Earl Gray. You will definitely get looks.

But what if you do want the Rolls-Royce experience but you can't afford a real Rolls-Royce?

Sorry. It just doesn't come any cheaper.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/AUTOS/carrev...ach/index.html
GFerg is offline  
Old 03-28-06, 08:54 PM
  #2  
PhilipMSPT
Cycle Savant
iTrader: (5)
 
PhilipMSPT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In rehab...
Posts: 21,527
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I'd drive the Rolls.

I'd be driven in the Maybach.

Why not get the best of both worlds?
PhilipMSPT is offline  
Old 03-28-06, 11:38 PM
  #3  
AJ
Lexus Champion

 
AJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: International
Posts: 3,649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've always liked the RR

On a side note , i noticed the grill on the Maybach looks kinda ugly
AJ is offline  
Old 03-29-06, 02:19 AM
  #4  
jhenty
Pole Position
 
jhenty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i love the rolls, way more presence. The maybach looks too much like a merc s-class in the front to justtify the price tag, and they are really less impressive than a bently or rolls in person. The interior on the other hand is amazing in both cars.
jhenty is offline  
Old 03-29-06, 05:32 AM
  #5  
LexusChris
Racer
iTrader: (1)
 
LexusChris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 1,805
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

If I had to choose between those to Phantom all the way it will get people staring, the new S-Class looks too much like the Maybach...but I would rather put my money on the new LS 460 and a couple of other luxury cruisers...
LexusChris is offline  
Old 03-29-06, 06:15 AM
  #6  
Gojirra99
Super Moderator
 
Gojirra99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 30,054
Received 189 Likes on 130 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PhilipMSPT
I'd drive the Rolls.

I'd be driven in the Maybach.
The article seems to suggest it's the other way around

I like neither car, but out of the two, I'd pick the Rolls.
Gojirra99 is offline  
Old 03-29-06, 06:50 AM
  #7  
marshmallo
Lexus Champion
 
marshmallo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 2,184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by LexArazzo
I like neither car, but out of the two, I'd pick the Rolls.
Out of these I'd pick the LS460.

Those interiors look completely cheeseball in those pictures.
marshmallo is offline  
Old 03-29-06, 07:00 AM
  #8  
diablo1
Lexus Test Driver
 
diablo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the Rolls is tacky, inside and out. The rectangle headlights and circle fog lights do not look good together. The dash looks weird and outdated.

Maybach exterior is just ok, interior is beautiful.
diablo1 is offline  
Old 03-29-06, 07:21 AM
  #9  
DASHOCKER
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
DASHOCKER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 12,191
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Maybach to me is just a Benz s class with more gizmos. I love the double R's and Bentleys. Power luxury and speed in its purest form. Can I get a Bentley Continental GT please
DASHOCKER is offline  
Old 03-29-06, 07:37 AM
  #10  
marshmallo
Lexus Champion
 
marshmallo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 2,184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by diablo1
I think the Rolls is tacky, inside and out. The rectangle headlights and circle fog lights do not look good together. The dash looks weird and outdated.

Maybach exterior is just ok, interior is beautiful.
Just to expand a bit, the dash on the Rolls looks like it's from 1970. I would
feel like I am a 170 year old vampire driving that thing (luckily I can't afford
it ). The exterior is all right, but nothing special.

The Maybach's exterior is WEAK. While I am not a huge fan of the S Class,
it wipes the floor with that thing (both the new one and the old S do). The
interior is actually kind of nice, but it looks like a Lincoln town car.

If I had that kind of cash I'd get an LS460, a 911and a Benz coupe of some
kind. Oh yeah, and a GS350AWD as a winter beater.
marshmallo is offline  
Old 03-29-06, 07:49 AM
  #11  
GFerg
Speaks French in Russian

Thread Starter
 
GFerg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: What is G?
Posts: 13,250
Received 58 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

I personally would take the Phantom. I like the way it looks. I also like its interior more too. A RR's interior was never ment to be modern and updated. The use of wood, leather, and chrome is like no other. The way a true luxury car should be. Maybach is too plain for a 300K car.
GFerg is offline  
Old 03-29-06, 08:47 AM
  #12  
diablo1
Lexus Test Driver
 
diablo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DASHOCKER
Can I get a Bentley Continental GT please
I hear that! I'd take the Continental GT or an Aston DB9 in a heartbeat... Maybe in a few years.

Originally Posted by marshmallo
Just to expand a bit, the dash on the Rolls looks like it's from 1970. I would
feel like I am a 170 year old vampire driving that thing (luckily I can't afford
it ). The exterior is all right, but nothing special.

The Maybach's exterior is WEAK. While I am not a huge fan of the S Class,
it wipes the floor with that thing (both the new one and the old S do). The
interior is actually kind of nice, but it looks like a Lincoln town car.
I'm glad someone agrees with me! I say, if you want that 70's interior look, get a car from the 70's! Or get a new 3-series... haha, ok that was a cheap shot...
diablo1 is offline  
Old 03-29-06, 10:38 AM
  #13  
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 78 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

I've always preferred Bentlys (NOT the GT) over Rolls Royce. RR seems too "old" for me. I can imagine myself driving a bently, but not a rolls. The maybach will be the daily driver.
GSteg is offline  
Old 03-29-06, 10:59 AM
  #14  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,033
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Flying Spur plz, none of the above. For 350k the RR looks like crap on the inside, maybach looks better
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 03-29-06, 11:51 AM
  #15  
newr
Lexus Champion
 
newr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is old but some of you may not seen it before.

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/maybach.htm/printable

I would pick the Maybach over the Phantom in a heart beat.
newr is offline  


Quick Reply: Super-luxury showdown: Phantom vs. Maybach



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:45 AM.