[LB Lex]

It doesn't help our economy when manufacturing jobs are being lost to countries such as Inda and China where labor is extremely cheap. Just like it was stated above, our economy was starting to go downhill when Clinton was in office and the attack on 9/11 along with the subsequent defense expenses helped drain budgets. It is pure liberal rhetoric to blame the WHOLE economic downfall on Bush.

Liberal propaganda can easily be seen when stating the failure of the Roadmap to Peace is because of Bush. Why did we stop dealing Arafat? Because he couldn't control the suicide bombers. Another reason for its failure is the extremist terrorists who repeatedly subvert peace by continuing with suicide bombings. This problem hasn't been solved in the last thirty years by past Presidents' attempts. Why don't you blame them too, is it because it doesn't fit in your political agenda?

Take your ideological blinders off, then you'll see the situation is more complicated than you think. Blaming one person (Bush) is short sighted and ideologically driven. I'd rather have Bush in office instead of the *****-cat Gore who most likely would have been too chicken to attack Al Quada in Afganistan after 9/11.