Quote:
Originally posted by BAWLEX94
riveting article and all, but what does it have to do with Bush's current economic plans. So what if Clinton was "SOLEY REPSONSIBLE" for 9/11. You can find articles that argue for that all over the internet, as well as articles that argue the exact opposite. I thought this thread was about Bush's failed attempts at economic revival, as well as his failed attempts at reaching his goals for post war Iraq. Is Clinton responsible for Bush's less than mediocre policies when it comes to economic growth and stimulation? Is Clinton also repsonsible for President Bush's decision to wage a unilateral war on a soverign nation? And is Clinton responsible for the failed attempts at rebuilding Iraq and setting up new government?
|
First off, because of 9-11 Airlines have laid off over 40,000 employees. Most of them are in Bankruptsy and many airline support corporations (such as Boeing, GE, and Lockheed Martin) have laid off Thousands because of the slumpish airlines. Not only that, Enron, Worldcom, and several other large corporations laid off thousands because of corporate scandles. Its not the President, so stop blameing it all on him.
How long has is been since the war was over??? maybe a few months. What do you people expect..
"I think he should have repaired Iraq overnight" ---NO, impossible