riveting article and all, but what does it have to do with Bush's current economic plans. So what if Clinton was "SOLEY REPSONSIBLE" for 9/11. You can find articles that argue for that all over the internet, as well as articles that argue the exact opposite. I thought this thread was about Bush's failed attempts at economic revival, as well as his failed attempts at reaching his goals for post war Iraq. Is Clinton responsible for Bush's less than mediocre policies when it comes to economic growth and stimulation? Is Clinton also repsonsible for President Bush's decision to wage a unilateral war on a soverign nation? And is Clinton responsible for the failed attempts at rebuilding Iraq and setting up new government?
Last edited by BAWLEX94; 09-06-03 at 10:45 AM.
|