When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
And I've put the individual model charts to the test by comparing it to actual cars that I've owned and found my experiences closely matched what they were reporting.
I agree. CR's reliability ratings are pretty close to what I myself have experienced or seen among family, friends, and colleagues.
The one significant exception was my old 1984 Mazda, which was somewhat more unreliable than what CR averaged out for that year.
CR readers are not ONLY buying the cars CR recommends...
I bought a C6 for example and I'm a CR reader.
I find CR a VERY useful tool when buying something, but not the end-all source...its just another piece of information I use before buying.
Just because they don't always buy the cars CR recommends doesn't mean they don't buy CR recommended cars much more often than the typical non CR reader. So it doesn't mean it's a completely closed circuit polling method but it's still flawed.
But reliabilty is one of the big factors in determining what CR does or doesn't recommend. To make the CR recommended list, a vehicle has to pass CR's review/driving tests, have an acceptably good Government crash-safety rating, have an established record of average or better reliability, and, in the case of SUV's and high-center-of-gravity vehicles, pass CR's own rollover tests, which are done with outriggers. Usually, with an all-new or extensively redesigned vehicle, it takes a year or so (and an adequate number of owners filling out the surveys) to start to establish a credible reliability record.....which is why newly-introduced or redesigned models are sometimes not on the Recommended List evrn though previous versions have done well and have been reliable. CR, for example, got burned a few of years ago with the all-new Camry, when they gave it a Recommended rating based in its past record of good reliability. V6 models, though, had defective automatic transmissions, and some older 3.0L V6s had oil sludge/gel problems from not changing the oil enough. CR learned from those experiences....and, now, no longer recommends vehicles based solely on past reliability. They now have to start over and prove themselves with each new model or redesign.
Exactly my point, I read the data and I review their findings carefully and read their recommendations. And yes we are all aware of what CR does and doesn't do.
Then I reach my own conclusion, since I'm well qualified and experienced enough to do so. By reaching my own conclusion, often it agrees with their recommendations, sometimes it doesn't.
Just because they don't always buy the cars CR recommends doesn't mean they don't buy CR recommended cars much more often than the typical non CR reader. So it doesn't mean it's a completely closed circuit polling method but it's still flawed.
it works for me, except when they try to tell me what cereal tastes best
It's not that CR data is flawed, It's the fact that CR has so many reliability surveys in the automotive industry, it's difficult to keep up. When comparing survey results, it is VERY critical to understand which survey your looking at. I notice that this survey is called "predicted reliability" IMO, the CR survey we are most familiar with is "reliability history" Keep this in mind as I'm willing to bet that Lexus will sit higher in that survey.
I take an average of what CR says, what leading car magazines say in their longterm testing and short reviews, some general questions to real owners I know, and then how my test drives go. Between all that, I've loved every purchase I've made over the years. Education really makes a difference.
Just because they don't always buy the cars CR recommends doesn't mean they don't buy CR recommended cars much more often than the typical non CR reader. So it doesn't mean it's a completely closed circuit polling method but it's still flawed.
Originally Posted by IS-SV
Exactly, a very useful tool for the educated amongst us.
Has any one seen Consumers Annual report about Lexus reliability being number 8 behind Mitsubishi? I know I saw it someplace but I cannot remember where.
*** THREADS MERGED ***
Last edited by Gojirra99; Nov 2, 2009 at 08:52 AM.
Reason: merged threads
Has any one seen Consumers Annual report about Lexus reliability being number 8 behind Mitsubishi? I know I saw it someplace but I cannot remember where.
Haven't seen it, and I don't think the issue hits news stands till 11/3...but IIRC the current-gen AWD GS has gotten some pretty terrible reliability scores and it's dragged the whole brand down as a result lately.