View Single Post
Old 09-04-07, 02:36 PM   #18
GatorGreg
Pole Position
Trader Score: (0)
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tigmd99 View Post
Stretch body = stretching wheelbase = poor breakover angle = worst off-road performance. If you choose to stretch the front and rear instead of the middle part of the GX, then you will have poor approach and departure angles.
True, but the current GX already has a relatively short wheel base for its class (109.8" compared to, for example, Range Rover at 113.4" and Toureg?/Cayenne at 112.4"). So Lexus could stretch the wheelbase by 3.6" and still be the same as the RR which is apparently content with the associated breakover angle (although I think the RR benefits from air susp at all 4 corners unlike the GX just at the rear). Then Lexus could lengthen the body by an extra 0.7 inches at each end (which would have a negligible effect on the approach / departure angles) and voila, there's the 5 inches Alternatively, I would be happy with just an adjustable sliding 2nd row so I could divvy up the leg room btwn the 2nd and 3rd rows myself.
__________________
2003 Dorado Gold Pearl GX (2003 Four Wheeler & 4x4 of the Year)
nav/ml/3rdrow/spoiler/18"T4Rwheels
WHEEL PICS OFF-ROADING PICS

Last edited by GatorGreg; 09-04-07 at 02:39 PM.
GatorGreg is offline   Reply With Quote